Variation in Sensitivity, Absorption and Density of the Central Rod Distribution with Eccentricity

Purpose: To assess the human rod photopigment distribution and sensitivity with high spatial resolution within the central ±15° and to compare the results of pigment absorption, sensitivity and rod density distribution (number of rods per square degree). Method: Rod photopigment density distribution was measured with imaging densitometry using a modified Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Dark-adapted sensitivity profiles were measured with green stimuli (17′ arc diameter, 1° spacing) using a Tübingen manual perimeter. Sensitivity profiles were plotted on a linear scale and rod photopigment optical density distribution profiles were converted to absorption profiles of the rod photopigment layer. Results: Both the absorption profile of the rod photopigment and the linear sensitivity profile for green stimuli show a minimum at the foveal center and increase steeply with eccentricity. The variation with eccentricity corresponds to the rod density distribution. Conclusion: Rod photopigment absorption profiles, retinal sensitivity profiles, and the rod density distribution are linearly related within the central ±15°. This is in agreement with theoretical considerations. Both methods, imaging retinal densitometry using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope and dark-adapted perimetry with small green stimuli, are useful for assessing the central rod distribution and sensitivity. However, at present, both methods have limitations. Suggestions for improving the reliability of both methods are given.

[1]  R. Massof,et al.  Rod sensitivity relative to cone sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  E Zrenner,et al.  Modifying a Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope for imaging densitometry. , 1997, Applied optics.

[3]  A. Elsner,et al.  Mapping cone photopigment optical density. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  J. L. Schnapf,et al.  Visual transduction in human rod photoreceptors. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  J. Lupski,et al.  A photoreceptor cell-specific ATP-binding transporter gene (ABCR) is mutated in recessive Starqardt macular dystrophy , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[6]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  R A Weale,et al.  Rhodopsin density and visual threshold in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1973, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  B. Stabell,et al.  Variation in density of macular pigmentation and in short-wave cone sensitivity with eccentricity. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  P. Kilbride,et al.  Visual pigments in the human macula assessed by imaging fundus reflectometry. , 1990, Applied optics.

[10]  C. M. Kemp,et al.  Retinal function and rhodopsin levels in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa with rhodopsin mutations. , 1991, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  RELATION BETWEEN DARK ADAPTATION AND VISUAL PIGMENT REGENERATION. , 1964, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  R. Weale,et al.  Rhodopsin and visual threshold in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  D. Van Norren,et al.  Imaging retinal densitometry with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope , 1989, Vision Research.