Peer Tutors' Effects on Activity Levels of Deaf Students in Inclusive Elementary Physical Education

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of trained peer tutors on the physical activity levels of deaf students1 in inclusive elementary physical education classes. A single subject delayed multiple baseline design across 8 deaf participants (4 boys and 4 girls) ages 10 to 12 was used. Eight typically developing, trained peers of the same age and gender served as peer tutors following training in use of sign language and basic teaching strategies. The dependent variable was moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) determined by McKenzie, Sallis and Nader’s (1991) System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT). The study included 3–4 sessions of baseline, 11–14 sessions of intervention, and 1–3 sessions of maintenance. Results revealed that after the introduction of peer tutoring, deaf students increased their MVPA from to 22% to 41.5%, and peer tutors increased their MVPA from 19% to 37.9%.

[1]  S. Butterfield.  Physical Education and Sport for the Deaf: Rethinking the Least Restrictive Environment , 1991 .

[2]  J. Goodman,et al.  Hearing Impaired Children and Youth: A Review of Psychomotor Behavior , 1992 .

[3]  R. Stucky-Ropp,et al.  Determinants of exercise in children. , 1993, Preventive medicine.

[4]  J. Depaepe.  The Influence of Three Least Restrictive Environments on the Content Motor-ALT and Performance of Moderately Mentally Retarded Students , 1985 .

[5]  J. Sallis,et al.  Correlates of vigorous exercise in a predominantly low SES and minority high school population. , 1994, Preventive medicine.

[6]  B. Wold,et al.  Parental and peer influences on leisure-time physical activity in young adolescents. , 1992, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[7]  C. Cambra.  A Comparative Study of Personality Descriptors Attributed to the Deaf, the Blind, and Individuals with No Sensory Disability , 1996, American annals of the deaf.

[8]  M. Snell.  Systematic instruction of persons with severe handicaps , 1987 .

[9]  J. Sallis,et al.  SOFIT: System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time , 1992 .

[10]  Gail E. Webster.  Influence of Peer Tutors upon Academic Learning Time–Physical Education of Mentally Handicapped Students , 1987 .

[11]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  Classwide Peer Tutoring , 1986 .

[12]  S. Foster.  Social Alienation and Peer Identification: A Study of the Social Construction of Deafness , 1989 .

[13]  J. P. Winnick,et al.  Physical Fitness of Adolescents with Auditory Impairments , 1986 .

[14]  O. Cohen.  The Adverse Implications of Full Inclusion for Deaf Students. , 1995 .

[15]  C. Corbin,et al.  Physical fitness: questions teachers ask. , 1993 .

[16]  D. Bemben,et al.  Effects of a Peer-Mediated Aerobic Conditioning Program on Fitness Measures with Children Who have Moderate and Severe Disabilities , 1989 .

[17]  Martin E. Block,et al.  Use Peer Tutors and Task Sheets , 1995 .

[18]  J. Dunn,et al.  The Effect of Peer Tutors on Motor Performance in Integrated Physical Education Classes , 1997 .

[19]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Reliability Scores That Delude: An Alice in Wonderland Trip Through the Misleading Characteristics of Inter-Observer Agreement Scores in Interval Recording. , 1973 .