Post-Processing Fairness Evaluation of Federated Models: An Unsupervised Approach in Healthcare

Modern Healthcare cyberphysical systems have begun to rely more and more on distributed AI leveraging the power of Federated Learning (FL). Its ability to train Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models for the wide variety of medical fields, while at the same time fortifying the privacy of the sensitive information that are present in the medical sector, makes the FL technology a necessary tool in modern health and medical systems. Unfortunately, due to the polymorphy of distributed data and the shortcomings of distributed learning, the local training of Federated models sometimes proves inadequate and thus negatively imposes the federated learning optimization process and in extend in the subsequent performance of the rest Federated models. Badly trained models can cause dire implications in the healthcare field due to their critical nature. This work strives to solve this problem by applying a post-processing pipeline to models used by FL. In particular, the proposed work ranks the model by finding how fair they are by discovering and inspecting micro-Manifolds that cluster each neural model's latent knowledge. The produced work applies a completely unsupervised both model and data agnostic methodology that can be leveraged for general model fairness discovery. The proposed methodology is tested against a variety of benchmark DL architectures and in the FL environment, showing an average 8.75% increase in Federated model accuracy in comparison with similar work.

[1]  Aniello Castiglione,et al.  CDT-CAD: Context-Aware Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Chest Abnormality Detection on X-Ray Images. , 2023, IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics.

[2]  Alycia N. Carey,et al.  Robust Personalized Federated Learning under Demographic Fairness Heterogeneity , 2022, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[3]  Reza M. Parizi,et al.  Fairness in Federated Learning for Spatial-Temporal Applications , 2022, ArXiv.

[4]  Yahya H. Ezzeldin,et al.  FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learning , 2021, AAAI.

[5]  Thomas Lagkas,et al.  Unsupervised Ethical Equity Evaluation of Adversarial Federated Networks , 2021, ARES.

[6]  Shaohua Wan,et al.  FedCPF: An Efficient-Communication Federated Learning Approach for Vehicular Edge Computing in 6G Communication Networks , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Thomas Lagkas,et al.  Modeling, Detecting, and Mitigating Threats Against Industrial Healthcare Systems: A Combined Software Defined Networking and Reinforcement Learning Approach , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[8]  Michael Littman,et al.  Model Selection's Disparate Impact in Real-World Deep Learning Applications , 2021, ArXiv.

[9]  Bingbing Ni,et al.  MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysis , 2020, 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[10]  M. Chowdhury,et al.  Oort: Efficient Federated Learning via Guided Participant Selection , 2020, OSDI.

[11]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approach , 2020, AAAI.

[12]  Ngai-Man Cheung,et al.  On Data Augmentation for GAN Training , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Artem Babenko,et al.  Unsupervised Discovery of Interpretable Directions in the GAN Latent Space , 2020, ICML.

[14]  Erez Shmueli,et al.  Algorithmic Fairness , 2020, ArXiv.

[15]  Alejandro Barredo Arrieta,et al.  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[16]  Wei Yang Bryan Lim,et al.  Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey , 2019, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[17]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning , 2019, ACM Comput. Surv..

[18]  Mengxiao Hu,et al.  Exploring Bias in GAN-based Data Augmentation for Small Samples , 2019, ArXiv.

[19]  Mehryar Mohri,et al.  Agnostic Federated Learning , 2019, ICML.

[20]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  Opportunities and challenges in developing deep learning models using electronic health records data: a systematic review , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  Lu Zhang,et al.  FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networks , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[22]  Pravesh Kothari,et al.  An Analysis of the t-SNE Algorithm for Data Visualization , 2018, COLT.

[23]  Tom White,et al.  Generative Adversarial Networks: An Overview , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[24]  Alun D. Preece,et al.  Interpretability of deep learning models: A survey of results , 2017, 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI).

[25]  Ananda Theertha Suresh,et al.  Distributed Mean Estimation with Limited Communication , 2016, ICML.

[26]  Blaise Agüera y Arcas,et al.  Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data , 2016, AISTATS.

[27]  Jun Sakuma,et al.  Fairness-Aware Classifier with Prejudice Remover Regularizer , 2012, ECML/PKDD.

[28]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Finding a "Kneedle" in a Haystack: Detecting Knee Points in System Behavior , 2011, 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.

[29]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Fair Representation for Safe Artificial Intelligence via Adversarial Learning of Unbiased Information Bottleneck , 2020, SafeAI@AAAI.

[30]  S. Velliangiri,et al.  A Review of Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Efficient Computation , 2019, Procedia Computer Science.

[31]  Sungroh Yoon,et al.  How Generative Adversarial Networks and Its Variants Work : An Overview of GAN , 2017 .