The Influence of Premilking Teat Preparation and Attachment Delay on Milk Yield and Milking Performance

Abstract Premilking teat preparation and attachment delay were varied in four experiments conducted with American Holstein, Danish Holstein, and Danish Jersey cows. Premilking teat preparation varied from 10 to 30 s and consisted of wiping teats for 6 to 20 s and stripping one to five squirts of milk from each teat. Attachment delay from beginning of premilking teat preparation until machine attachment varied from .5 to 3.0 min. Longer preparation significantly increased milk yield for Danish Jersey cows, but not for American or Danish Holstein cows. Older Danish Jersey cows were more sensitive to premilking teat preparation than first lactation cows. Attachment delay influenced the milk yield in Danish Jersey cows, amount of residual fat in American Holsteins, and fat percentage in the residual milk of American and Danish Holstein cows. A 1.3-min delay can be generally recommended for the whole herd with only small or no milk loss for cows in early stage of lactation. Milk yield decreased for Danish Jersey cows and tended to decrease for American Holstein cows when machine attachment was delayed to 3.0 min, regardless of stage of lactation. The lack of treatment effects for Danish Holstein cows may be due to a lack of conditioned stimulation for cows milked in their tie stalls compared with the response of cows moved to milking parlors for milking. Added duration of teat wiping, vigorousness of teat stripping, and delay of machine attachment hastened steady milk flow. Conversely, advanced days in lactation delayed steady milk flow. The high fat content of Danish Jerseys did not delay the start of steady milk flow compared with the American and Danish Holsteins. In late stage of lactation, 30 s of teat preparation and 1.3 min of machine attachment delay minimized time until steady milk flow as well as 10 s of teat preparation and 3.0 min of attachment delay.

[1]  D. Schams,et al.  Lactational changes in oxytocin release, intramammary pressure and milking characteristics in dairy cows , 1991, Journal of Dairy Research.

[2]  G. Mein Forces applied to the teat: conventional milking , 1991 .

[3]  N. E. Jensen,et al.  Comparison of a Standardized and Variable Milking Routine , 1990 .

[4]  K. Svennersten,et al.  Effect of local stimulation of one quarter on milk production and milk components. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  H. Erb,et al.  Effects of premilking stimulation on complete lactation milk yield and milking performance. , 1987, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  D. Phillips Studies on pre-milking preparation 8. A comparison of 10 and 45 seconds of wash and stimulus , 1986 .

[7]  R. Gorewit,et al.  Effects of duration of udder stimulation on milking dynamics and oxytocin release. , 1985, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  D. Schams,et al.  Oxytocin secretion during milking in dairy cows with regard to the variation and importance of a threshold level for milk removal. , 1984, The Journal of endocrinology.

[9]  D. Phillips Studies on pre-milking preparation 2. The effect of delay between pre-milking stimulus and milking , 1984 .

[10]  A. Lefcourt,et al.  Is oxytocin really necessary for efficient milk removal in dairy cows? , 1983, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  D. Wilson,et al.  Premilking stimulation effects on milking performance and oxytocin and prolactin release in cows. , 1980, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  R. Sieber,et al.  Milking machine effects on impacts and teat end lesions. , 1980 .