Evaluation of Riparian Tree Cover and Shading in the Chauga River Watershed Using LiDAR and Deep Learning Land Cover Classification

River systems face negative impacts from development and removal of riparian vegetation that provide critical shading in the face of climate change. This study used supervised deep learning to accurately classify the land cover, including shading, of the Chauga River watershed, located in Oconee County, South Carolina, for 2011 and 2019. The study examined the land cover differences along the Chauga River and its tributaries, inside and outside the Sumter National Forest. LiDAR data were incorporated in solar radiation calculations for the Chauga River inside and outside the National Forest. The deep learning classifications produced land cover maps with high overall accuracy (97.09% for 2011; 97.58% for 2019). The most significant difference in land cover was in tree cover in the 50 m buffer of the tributaries inside the National Forest compared to the tributaries outside the National Forest (2011: 95.39% vs. 81.84%, 2019: 92.86% vs. 82.06%). The solar radiation calculations also confirmed a difference between the area inside and outside the National Forest, with the mean temperature being greater outside the protected area (outside: 455.845 WH/m2; inside: 416,770 WH/m2). This study suggests that anthropogenic influence in the Chauga River watershed is greater in the areas outside the Sumter National Forest, which could cause damage to the river ecosystem if left unchecked in the future as development pressures increase. This study demonstrates the accurate application of deep learning for high-resolution classification of river shading combined with the use of LiDAR data to estimate solar radiation reaching the Chauga River. Techniques to monitor riparian zones and shading at high spatial resolutions are critical for the mitigation of the negative impacts of warming climates on aquatic ecosystems.

[1]  L. Gentry,et al.  Relationships among nutrients, chlorophyll-a, and dissolved oxygen in agricultural streams in Illinois. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[2]  Damon M. Hall,et al.  Forested Riparian Buffers as Climate Adaptation Tools for Management of Riverine Flow and Thermal Regimes: A Case Study in the Meramec River Basin , 2021, Sustainability.

[3]  Yongping Yuan,et al.  Spatial characterization of riparian buffer effects on sediment loads from watershed systems. , 2014, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  Global river discharge and water temperature under climate change , 2013 .

[5]  J. Pankiw Seasonality of imagery: the impact on object-based classification accuracy of shelterbelts , 2012 .

[6]  M. Charlton,et al.  A novel application of remote sensing for modelling impacts of tree shading on water quality. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Scott A. Drzyzga,et al.  Squeezed from All Sides: Urbanization, Invasive Species, and Climate Change Threaten Riparian Forest Buffers , 2020 .

[8]  J. D. Tobe,et al.  Vascular Flora of the Chauga River Gorge , 1992 .

[9]  M. Power,et al.  Subcanopy solar radiation model: predicting solar radiation across a heavily vegetated landscape using LiDAR and GIS solar radiation models. , 2014 .

[10]  P. Moniewski River Bed Shade and its Importance in the Process of Studying of the Fundamental Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Small River Waters , 2011 .

[11]  Florentina Moatar,et al.  Improving representation of riparian vegetation shading in a regional stream temperature model using LiDAR data. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  Adapting boreal streams to climate change: effects of riparian vegetation on water temperature and biological assemblages , 2016, Freshwater Science.

[13]  Jonathan R. B. Fisher,et al.  Impact of satellite imagery spatial resolution on land use classification accuracy and modeled water quality , 2018 .

[14]  G. Pinay,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Denitrification in a Riparian Forest , 1993 .

[15]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  A review of large area monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data , 2012 .

[16]  Justin Morgenroth,et al.  Developments in Landsat Land Cover Classification Methods: A Review , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[17]  R. Staniszewski,et al.  Shading of River Channels as an Important Factor Reducing Macrophyte Biodiversity , 2019, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies.

[18]  Krzysztof Sterenczak,et al.  Modeling Solar Radiation in the Forest Using Remote Sensing Data: A Review of Approaches and Opportunities , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[19]  D. Hannah,et al.  An evaluation of different forest cover geospatial data for riparian shading and river temperature modelling , 2020, River Research and Applications.

[20]  M. K. Drinkard,et al.  An unprotected tributary has no detectable impact on macroinvertebrates in a Wild and Scenic River in the southeast (Chattooga) , 2021, Bios.

[21]  D. Weller,et al.  Nutrient Interception by a Riparian Forest Receiving Inputs from Adjacent Cropland , 1993 .

[22]  T. Beechie,et al.  Historical and Future Stream Temperature Change Predicted by a Lidar‐Based Assessment of Riparian Condition and Channel Width , 2018 .

[23]  T. Kałuża,et al.  Modeling of River Channel Shading as a Factor for Changes in Hydromorphological Conditions of Small Lowland Rivers , 2020, Water.

[24]  Tectonic assembly of the Brevard-Chauga belt, South Carolina: Fluid inclusion evidence from Appalachian Deep Core Site Investigation Hole 2 (ADCOH-2) , 2004 .

[25]  P. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Model-based assessment of shading effect by riparian vegetation on river water quality , 2009 .

[26]  H. Rauch,et al.  The influence of riparian vegetation shading on water temperature during low flow conditions in a medium sized river , 2017 .

[27]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: A review , 2016 .

[28]  J. Hubbart,et al.  A Spatially Distributed Investigation of Stream Water Temperature in a Contemporary Mixed-Land-Use Watershed , 2020, Water.

[29]  M. A. Haq,et al.  Deep Learning Based Supervised Image Classification Using UAV Images for Forest Areas Classification , 2020, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing.

[30]  Sanjiv Tyagi,et al.  Influences of natural and anthropogenic factors on surface and groundwater quality in rural and urban areas , 2015 .

[31]  Steven K. Mickelson,et al.  Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations. , 2000 .

[32]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Deep Learning for Land Cover Classification Using Only a Few Bands , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Brian Richter,et al.  Climate Change and River Ecosystems: Protection and Adaptation Options , 2009, Environmental management.

[34]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Using multi-seasonal Landsat imagery for rapid identification of abandoned land in areas affected by urban sprawl , 2017, Ecological Indicators.

[35]  J. Best,et al.  Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[36]  R. Helliwell,et al.  Managing riparian buffer strips to optimise ecosystem services: A review , 2020 .

[37]  Sheng Li,et al.  Assessing impacts of riparian buffer zones on sediment and nutrient loadings into streams at watershed scale using an integrated REMM‐SWAT model , 2017 .

[38]  M. Daniels,et al.  Impacts of stream riparian buffer land use on water temperature and food availability for fish , 2018 .