Nanofluidization as affected by vibration and electrostatic fields

Abstract In this paper we investigate the behavior of a fluidized bed of silica nanoparticles under the influence of externally applied vibrations and an electrostatic field. We have observed that the application of these fields separately has opposite effects on bed expansion. On one hand, vertical vibrations enhance bed expansion as the vibration intensity is increased up to a critical value. On the other hand, an electrostatic field applied in the horizontal direction, hinders bed expansion. In previous research papers, it has been suggested that the size of nanoparticle agglomerates could be affected either by vibration or by the action of the electric field. Using the modified Richardson–Zaki method to analyze our experimental data we find that vertical vibration tends to decrease the average agglomerate size in agreement with previous research. However, in this work we look further into the physical mechanisms which affect the response of the fluidized bed. Our results suggest that both vibration and the electric field produce a significant perturbation to the flow of agglomerates within the fluidized bed. Vibration transmits a vertical motion to the agglomerates that enhances bed expansion until the vibration velocity becomes of the order of the expected rising velocity of macroscopic bubbles. At this critical point, bubble growth is stimulated by vibration. A horizontal electrostatic field produces a drift of the charged agglomerates toward the walls that gives rise to fluidization heterogeneity and bed collapse. When both fields are simultaneous applied, these opposed effects can be practically compensated.

[1]  Weijia Wen,et al.  Electric-field-induced diffusion-limited aggregation , 1997 .

[2]  A. D. Moore Electrostatics and its applications , 1973 .

[3]  Elisabeth Guazzelli,et al.  Experimental investigation on the secondary instability of liquid-fluidized beds and the formation of bubbles , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Julio Soria,et al.  Laser-based planar imaging of nano-particle fluidization: Part II—mechanistic analysis of nanoparticle aggregation , 2006 .

[5]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Aerated vibrofluidization of silica nanoparticles , 2004 .

[6]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  The settling of fine cohesive powders , 2001 .

[7]  Alan W. Weimer,et al.  Aggregation behavior of nanoparticles in fluidized beds , 2005 .

[8]  J. Valverde,et al.  Effect of vibration on the stability of a gas-fluidized bed of fine powder. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Martin Glor,et al.  ELECTROSTATIC HAZARDS IN POWDER HANDLING , 1988 .

[10]  P. Gennes Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics , 1979 .

[11]  Jamal Chaouki,et al.  Effect of interparticle forces on the hydrodynamic behaviour of fluidized aerogels , 1985 .

[12]  Paul M. Chaikin,et al.  Long-range correlations in sedimentation , 1997 .

[13]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Fluidization of fine and ultrafine particles using nitrogen and neon as fluidizing gases , 2008 .

[14]  J. Valverde,et al.  Aggregation and sedimentation in gas-fluidized beds of cohesive powders. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  P. Umbanhowar,et al.  An effective gravitational temperature for sedimentation , 2001, Nature.

[16]  K. Rietema,et al.  The Dynamics of Fine Powders , 1991 .

[17]  J. F. Richardson,et al.  Bubble velocities and bed expansions in freely bubbling fluidised beds , 1969 .

[18]  T. Czech,et al.  Modern electrostatic devices and methods for exhaust gas cleaning: A brief review , 2007 .

[19]  D. A. Dunnett Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[20]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Fluidization, bubbling and jamming of nanoparticle agglomerates , 2007 .

[21]  J. Visser On Hamaker constants: A comparison between Hamaker constants and Lifshitz-van der Waals constants , 1972 .

[22]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Sound assisted fluidization of nanoparticle agglomerates , 2004 .

[23]  Feng Electrostatic interaction between two charged dielectric spheres in contact , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[24]  J. Valverde,et al.  Physics of compaction of fine cohesive particles. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[25]  Hiroyuki Hatano,et al.  Modeling for size reduction of agglomerates in nanoparticle fluidization , 2004 .

[26]  Dimitri Gidaspow,et al.  Effect of electric field on the hydrodynamics of fluidized nanoparticles , 2008 .

[27]  Wiltzius,et al.  Hydrodynamic behavior of fractal aggregates. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[28]  Julio Soria,et al.  Laser-based planar imaging of nano-particle fluidization: Part I—determination of aggregate size and shape , 2006 .

[29]  P. Mills,et al.  Experimental study on the dynamics of gas-fluidized beds. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Wei Fei,et al.  Fluidization and agglomerate structure of SiO2 nanoparticles , 2002 .

[31]  J. Davidson,et al.  On the Liquidlike Behavior of Fluidized Beds , 1977 .

[32]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Effect of vibration on agglomerate particulate fluidization , 2006 .

[33]  Chao Zhu,et al.  Gas fluidization characteristics of nanoparticle agglomerates , 2005 .