Towards Granular Computing : Classifiers Induced From Granular Structures

Granular computing as a paradigm is an area frequently studied within the Approximate Reasoning paradigm. Proposed by L. A.Zadeh granular computing has been studied within fuzzy as well as rough set approaches to uncertainty. It is manifest that both theories are immanently related to granulation as fuzzy set theory begins with fuzzy membership functions whose inverse images are prototype granules whereas rough set theory starts with indiscernibility relations whose classes are prototype, or, elementary granules. Many authors have devoted their works to analysis of granulation of knowledge, definitions of granules, methods for combining (fusing) granules into larger objects, applications of granular structures, see, quoted in references works by A. Skowron, T.Y. Lin, Y.Y.Yao, L.Polkowski and others. In this work, the emphasis is laid on granular decision (data) systems: they are introduced, methods of their construction with examples are pointed to, and applications are exhibited; those applications are founded on the basic although often implicit principle of data mining, viz., once a plausible for given data similarity measure is found, objects satisfactorily similar should reveal sufficiently close (or, for that matter identical) class values. In this work, this principle is applied to granules, following the idea presented by L.Polkowski at 2005, 2006 IEEE GrC conferences, that granules built on basis of a similarity relation from a given decision system should consists of objects similar to such a degree that averaging them would lead to new objects which together would constitute a new decision system preserving to a high degree knowledge represented by the original decision system. As knowledge in rough set theory is meant as the classification ability, it seems reasonable to test knowledge content with classifiers as classifier accuracy. This informal idea is tested in this work with some specific tools for granule construction, granular system building, and some well–tested classifiers known in literature for a few data sets from the UCI repository. In the following sections we outline: basic ideas of rough computing, granulation of knowledge, the idea of a granular decision system and we include the results of exemplary tests with real data.

[1]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2012, Springer London.

[2]  Lech Polkowski,et al.  Granular Computing: Granular Classifiers and Missing Values , 2007, 6th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics.

[3]  Lech Polkowski,et al.  Granulation of Knowledge in Decision Systems: The Approach Based on Rough Inclusions. The Method and Its Applications , 2007, RSEISP.

[4]  Lech Polkowski,et al.  On Granular Rough Computing with Missing Values , 2007, RSEISP.

[5]  Qing Liu,et al.  Theoretical Study of Granular Computing , 2006, RSKT.

[6]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Graduation and granulation are keys to computation with information described in natural language , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing.

[7]  Tsau Young Lin,et al.  Granular computing: examples, intuitions and modeling , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing.

[8]  Lech Polkowski,et al.  Formal granular calculi based on rough inclusions , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing.

[9]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Perspectives of granular computing , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing.

[10]  Lech Polkowski,et al.  Toward Rough Set Foundations. Mereological Approach , 2004, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[11]  Lech Polkowski,et al.  A Rough Set Paradigm for Unifying Rough Set Theory and Fuzzy Set Theory , 2003, RSFDGrC.

[12]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough Mereological Calculi of Granules: A Rough Set Approach To Computation , 2001, Comput. Intell..

[13]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Information granules: Towards foundations of granular computing , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[14]  Sinh Hoa Nguyen,et al.  Regularity analysis and its applications in data mining , 2000 .

[15]  Jan G. Bazan,et al.  Rough set algorithms in classification problem , 2000 .

[16]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  A Comparison of Several Approaches to Missing Attribute Values in Data Mining , 2000, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[17]  Petr Hájek,et al.  Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic , 1998, Trends in Logic.

[18]  A. Skowron,et al.  Towards adaptive calculus of granules , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36228).

[19]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough mereology: A new paradigm for approximate reasoning , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[20]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy sets and information granularity , 1996 .

[21]  Janusz Zalewski,et al.  Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , 1996 .

[22]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Boolean Reasoning for Decision Rules Generation , 1993, ISMIS.

[23]  Theresa Beaubouef,et al.  Rough Sets , 2009, Database Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications.

[24]  Y. Yao,et al.  Granular Computing: basic issues and possible solutions , 2007 .

[25]  Piotr Artiemjew Classifiers from Granulated Data Sets : Concept Dependent and Layered Granulation , 2007 .

[26]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Data with Missing Attribute Values: Generalization of Indiscernibility Relation and Rule Induction , 2004, Trans. Rough Sets.

[27]  Jakub Wróblewski,et al.  Adaptive Aspects of Combining Approximation Spaces , 2004, Rough-Neural Computing: Techniques for Computing with Words.

[28]  Y. Yao,et al.  Information Granulation and Approximation in a Decision-theoretic Model of Rough Sets , 2003 .

[29]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Grammar Systems for Distributed Synthesis of Approximate Solutions Extracted from Experience , 1999, Grammatical Models of Multi-Agent Systems.

[30]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems 1 , 1999 .

[31]  Jan G. Bazan Chapter 17 a Comparison of Dynamic and Non{dynamic Rough Set Methods for Extracting Laws from Decision Tables , 1998 .

[32]  Jerzy Stefanowski,et al.  On rough set based approaches to induction of decision rules , 1998 .

[33]  T. Y. Lin,et al.  GRANULAR COMPUTING: From Rough Sets and Neighborhood Systems to Information Granulation and Computing with Words , 1997 .

[34]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  LERS-A System for Learning from Examples Based on Rough Sets , 1992, Intelligent Decision Support.