Empiricism and Theorizing in Epidemiology and Social Network Analysis

The connection between theory and data is an iterative one. In principle, each is informed by the other: data provide the basis for theory that in turn generates the need for new information. This circularity is reflected in the notion of abduction, a concept that focuses on the space between induction (generating theory from data) and deduction (testing theory with data). Einstein, in the 1920s, placed scientific creativity in that space. In the field of social network analysis, some remarkable theory has been developed, accompanied by sophisticated tools to develop, extend, and test the theory. At the same time, important empirical data have been generated that provide insight into transmission dynamics. Unfortunately, the connection between them is often tenuous and the iterative loop is frayed. This circumstance may arise both from data deficiencies and from the ease with which data can be created by simulation. But for whatever reason, theory and empirical data often occupy different orbits. Fortunately, the relationship, while frayed, is not broken, to which several recent analyses merging theory and extant data will attest. Their further rapprochement in the field of social network analysis could provide the field with a more creative approach to experimentation and inference.

[1]  Friedrich A. von Hayek,et al.  The Pretence of Knowledge , 1975 .

[2]  A. Ghani,et al.  Sampling biases and missing data in explorations of sexual partner networks for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[4]  M Kretzschmar,et al.  Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.

[5]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[6]  H. Epstein,et al.  The Mathematics of Concurrent Partnerships and HIV: A Commentary on Lurie and Rosenthal, 2009 , 2010, AIDS and Behavior.

[7]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Power-Law Distribution of the World Wide Web , 2000, Science.

[8]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[9]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[10]  Daniel T. Halperin,et al.  Concurrent Sexual Partnerships and the HIV Epidemics in Africa: Evidence to Move Forward , 2010, AIDS and Behavior.

[11]  H. Epstein,et al.  Concurrent sexual partnerships help to explain Africa's high HIV prevalence: implications for prevention , 2004, The Lancet.

[12]  Martina Morris,et al.  Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: linking science and public health practice. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[13]  Samantha Rosenthal,et al.  Concurrent Partnerships as a Driver of the HIV Epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa? The Evidence is Limited , 2010, AIDS and Behavior.

[14]  L. Amaral,et al.  The web of human sexual contacts , 2001, Nature.

[15]  C. Hudson,et al.  Concurrent Partnerships Could Cause AIDS Epidemics , 1993, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[16]  R M May,et al.  The influence of concurrent partnerships on the dynamics of HIV/AIDS. , 1992, Mathematical biosciences.

[17]  John J. Potterat,et al.  The Atlanta Urban Networks Study: a blueprint for endemic transmission , 2000, AIDS.

[18]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the world-wide web , 2000 .

[19]  M. Kretzschmar,et al.  Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV , 1997, AIDS.

[20]  Richard Rothenberg,et al.  Large-Network Concepts and Small-Network Characteristics: Fixed and Variable Factors , 2007, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[21]  S. Helleringer,et al.  Sexual network structure and the spread of HIV in Africa: evidence from Likoma Island, Malawi , 2007, AIDS.

[22]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[23]  S. Goodman,et al.  p values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate. , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  Christopher D Pilcher,et al.  Amplified HIV transmission and new approaches to HIV prevention. , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[25]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[26]  Richard Rothenberg,et al.  Choosing a centrality measure: Epidemiologic correlates in the Colorado Springs study of social networks☆ , 1995 .

[27]  R. Anderson,et al.  Mathematical Models of the Transmission and Control of Sexually Transmitted Diseases , 2000, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[28]  C. Hudson,et al.  Risk factors for the spread of AIDS in rural Africa: evidence from a comparative seroepidemiological survey of AIDS, hepatitis B and syphilis in southwestern Uganda. , 1988, AIDS.

[29]  M. Handcock,et al.  Likelihood-based inference for stochastic models of sexual network formation. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[30]  Martina Morris,et al.  Concurrent Partnerships and Trans-mission Dynamics in Networks , 1995 .

[31]  C. Allen,et al.  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2011 .

[32]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[33]  A. M. Adam,et al.  Farewell to certitude: Einstein's novelty on Induction and Deduction, Fallibilism , 2000 .

[34]  Martina Morris,et al.  Degree Distributions in Sexual Networks: A Framework for Evaluating Evidence , 2008, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[35]  N. Pearce,et al.  Critical discussion in epidemiology: problems with the Popperian approach. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  A. Creese,et al.  Popper's philosophy for epidemiologists. , 1975, International journal of epidemiology.

[37]  Larry Sawers,et al.  Concurrent sexual partnerships do not explain the HIV epidemics in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence , 2010, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[38]  Mark S. Handcock,et al.  Modeling Social Networks with Sampled or Missing Data , 2007 .