Legal Certainty, European-ness and Realpolitik

ABSTRACT The stimulus for this paper is an article published in 2005 by Wüstemann and Kierzek together with a critical comment thereon by Nobes in 2006. The original paper discusses the IFRS proposals, and the philosophy they represent, concerning revenue recognition. Nobes, in terms which this author broadly supports, criticises their revenue recognition proposals in some detail, together, again rightly, with some of their assumptions. This paper, rather than reopening these specific issues, considers the explicit statement, for example, p. 71, and elsewhere, that there is a ‘requirement of legal certainty in the European Union’, a statement which is given neither logical justification nor supporting references. IAS, EU requirements and GoB as a national concept are all argued to be flexible, judgemental and, necessarily and permanently, devoid of ‘legal certainty’. Implications of this analysis for regulation, harmonisation and for educational programmes in today's global environment are considered.

[1]  C. Nobes.  Revenue Recognition and EU Endorsement of IFRS , 2006 .

[2]  Dieter Ordelheide.  True and fair view , 2006 .

[3]  Eva K. Jermakowicz,et al.  A True and Fair View of the Principles/Rules Debate , 2006 .

[4]  Jens Wüstemann,et al.  Revenue Recognition under IFRS Revisited: Conceptual Models, Current Proposals and Practical Consequences , 2005 .

[5]  Lisa Evans,et al.  Language, translation and the problem of international accounting communication , 2004 .

[6]  L. Evans.  The true and fair view and the ‘fair presentation’ override of IAS 1 , 2003 .

[7]  D. Alexander,et al.  On economic reality, representational faithfulness and the ‘true and fair override’ , 2003 .

[8]  J. Baetge,et al.  Kapitel 4: Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Buchführung , 2002 .

[9]  D. Alexander.  The over-riding importance of internationalism: a reply to Nobes , 2001 .

[10]  C. Nobes.  Is true and fair of over-riding importance?: a comment on Alexander's benchmark , 2000 .

[11]  David Alexander,et al.  A benchmark for the adequacy of published financial statements , 1999 .

[12]  K. V. Hulle.  The true and fair view override in the European Accounting Directives , 1997 .

[13]  S. Zeff.  Playing the Congressional Card on Employee Stock Options: A fearful escalation in the impact of economic consequences lobbying on standard setting , 1997 .

[14]  D. Alexander.  Truer and fairer. Uninvited comments on invited comments , 1996 .

[15]  J. Baetge,et al.  Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Buchführung , 1995 .

[16]  Dieter Ordelheide.  True and fair view: A European and a German perspective II , 1993 .

[17]  D. Alexander.  A European true and fair view , 1993 .

[18]  D. Alexander,et al.  European Accounting Guide , 1995 .

[19]  Eiichiro Kudo.  A Critical Study on the IASC's Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements , 1991 .

[20]  Christopher Nobes,et al.  A JUDGEMENTAL INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FINANCIAL REPORTING PRACTICES , 1983 .

[21]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reason, Truth and History. , 1985 .

[22]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reason, Truth and History: Contents , 1981 .

[23]  U. Leffson.  Die Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Buchführung , 1972 .

[24]  Rudolf Christoffers.  Die aktienrechtlichen Bilanzierungsvorschriften als Grundsätze ordnungsgemäßer Bilanzierung , 1969 .