Airframe Noise Results from the QTD II Flight Test Program

With continued growth in air travel, sensitivity to community noise intensifies and materializes in the form of increased monitoring, regulations, and restrictions. Accordingly, realization of quieter aircraft is imperative, albeit only achievable with reduction of both engine and airframe components of total aircraft noise. Model-scale airframe noise testing has aided in this pursuit; however, the results are somewhat limited due to lack of fidelity of model hardware, particularly in simulating full-scale landing gear. Moreover, simulation of true in-flight conditions is non-trivial if not infeasible. This paper reports on an investigation of full-scale landing gear noise measured as part of the 2005 Quiet Technology Demonstrator 2 (QTD2) flight test program. Conventional Boeing 777-300ER main landing gear were tested, along with two noise reduction concepts, namely a toboggan fairing and gear alignment with the local flow, both of which were down-selected from various other noise reduction devices evaluated in model-scale testing at Virginia Tech. The full-scale toboggan fairings were designed by Goodrich Aerostructures as add-on devices allowing for complete retraction of the main gear. The baseline-conventional gear, faired gear, and aligned gear were all evaluated with the high-lift system in the retracted position and deployed at various flap settings, all at engine idle power setting. Measurements were taken with flyover community noise microphones and a large aperture acoustic phased array, yielding far-field spectra, and localized sources (beamform maps). The results were utilized to evaluate qualitatively and quantitatively the merit of each noise reduction concept. Complete similarity between model-scale and full-scale noise reduction levels was not found and requires further investigation. Far-field spectra exhibited no noise reduction for both concepts across all angles and frequencies. Phased array beamform maps show inconclusive evidence of noise reduction at selective frequencies (1500 to 3000 Hz) but are otherwise in general agreement with the far-field spectra results (within measurement uncertainty).

[1]  Jean Francois Piet,et al.  Localization of the acoustic sources of the A340 with a large phased microphone array during flight tests. , 2002 .

[2]  Henri Siller,et al.  Airbus A319 Database from Dedicated Flyover Measurements to Investigate Noise Abatement Procedures , 2005 .

[3]  Michael Pott-Pollenske,et al.  Validation of a Semiempirical Airframe Noise Prediction Method through Dedicated A319 Flyover Noise Measurements , 2002 .

[4]  Ulf Michel,et al.  Directivity of landing-gear noise based on flyover measurements , 1999 .

[5]  Ricardo A. Burdisso,et al.  Screening of Potential Landing Gear Noise Control Devices at Virginia Tech For QTD II Flight Test , 2007 .

[6]  Peter Bartlett,et al.  The Joint Rolls-Royce/Boeing Quiet Technology Demonstrator Programme , 2004 .

[7]  Renaud Davy,et al.  Flight Test Investigation of Add-On Treatments to Reduce Aircraft Airframe Noise , 2005 .

[8]  Sebastien Guerin,et al.  Airframe noise characteristics from flyover measurements and prediction , 2006 .

[9]  Eric Nesbitt,et al.  A NOVEL ONSITE NARROWBAND TOOL FOR FLIGHT TEST ACOUSTIC DATA PROCESSING , 2002 .

[10]  Stefan Uellenberg,et al.  The Quiet Technology Demonstrator Program: Flight Validation of Airplane Noise-Reduction Concepts , 2006 .

[11]  G. Elias,et al.  LOCALIZATION OF ACOUSTIC SOURCE FROM A LANDING AIRCRAFT WITH A MICROPHONE ARRAY , 1999 .

[12]  Ulf Michel,et al.  Flyover Noise Measurements on Landing Aircraft with a Microphone Array , 1998 .

[13]  Robert W. Stoker,et al.  Acoustic Imaging of Aircraft Noise Sources Using Large Aperture Phased Arrays , 2006 .