A quantitative analysis of cross-contamination of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. via domestic kitchen surfaces.

Epidemiological data indicate that cross-contamination during food preparation in the home contributes noticeably to the occurrence of foodborne diseases. To help prevent such occurrences, the inclusion of a cross-contamination model in exposure assessments would aid in the development and evaluation of interventions used to control the spread of pathogenic bacteria. A quantitative analysis was carried out to estimate the probability of contamination and the levels of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. on salads as a result of cross-contamination from contaminated chicken carcasses via kitchen surfaces. Data on the prevalence and numbers of these bacteria on retail chicken carcasses and the use of unwashed surfaces to prepare foods were collected from scientific literature. The rates of bacterial transfer were collected from laboratory experiments and literature. A deterministic approach and Monte Carlo simulations that incorporated input parameter distributions were used to estimate the contamination of the product. The results have shown that the probability of Campylobacter spp. contamination on salads is higher than that of Salmonella spp., since both the prevalence and levels of Campylobacter spp. on chicken carcasses are higher than those of Salmonella spp. It is realistic to expect that a fraction of the human exposure to Campylobacter spp., in particular, originates from cross-contamination in private kitchens during food handling. The number of human campylobacteriosis cases could be reduced either by reducing the degree of Campylobacter spp. contamination on chicken carcasses or by improving the hygiene in private kitchens. To eliminate the cross-contamination route, it is important to use separate surfaces or to properly wash the surfaces during the preparation of raw and cooked foods or ready-to-eat foods.

[1]  Shaohua Zhao,et al.  Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella Serovars in Retail Chicken, Turkey, Pork, and Beef from the Greater Washington, D.C., Area , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  F. V. van Leusden,et al.  Quantification of the contamination of chicken and chicken products in the netherlands with Salmonella and Campylobacter. , 2001, Journal of food protection.

[3]  D. Comar,et al.  A National Australian Food Safety Telephone Survey. , 1999, Journal of food protection.

[4]  R R Beumer,et al.  Survival of foodborne pathogens on stainless steel surfaces and cross-contamination to foods. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[5]  D. Wareing,et al.  Campylobacter contamination of raw meat and poultry at retail sale: identification of multiple types and comparison with isolates from human infection. , 2000, Journal of food protection.

[6]  G. Paoli,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment: an emerging tool for emerging foodborne pathogens. , 1997, Emerging infectious diseases.

[7]  M. Uyttendaele,et al.  Incidence of Salmonella, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Listeria monocytogenes in poultry carcasses and different types of poultry products for sale on the Belgian retail market. , 1999, Journal of food protection.

[8]  A. Kruizinga,et al.  Socio-economic status, dietary intake and 10 y trends: the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey , 2003, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[9]  M. Nauta,et al.  A model for evaluating intervention strategies to control salmonella in the poultry meat production chain , 2000, Epidemiology and Infection.

[10]  T. Humphrey,et al.  Prevalence and numbers of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. on raw, whole chickens in relation to sampling methods. , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.

[11]  P. M. Foegeding Driving predictive modelling on a risk assessment path for enhanced food safety. , 1997, International journal of food microbiology.

[12]  Frédéric Carlin,et al.  A retail and consumer phase model for exposure assessment of Bacillus cereus. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[13]  A H Havelaar,et al.  Assessment of the dose-response relationship of Campylobacter jejuni. , 1996, International journal of food microbiology.

[14]  Kenneth W. Davies,et al.  Quantitative microbiological risk assessment: principles applied to determining the comparative risk of salmonellosis from chicken products. , 1998, Journal of food protection.

[15]  J. Meng,et al.  Development of a model for evaluation of microbial cross-contamination in the kitchen. , 1998, Journal of food protection.

[16]  A. Peters,et al.  Incidence of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolated from retail chicken and associated packaging in South Wales , 2001, Letters in applied microbiology.

[17]  Christopher J. Griffith,et al.  Assessment of the Standard of Consumer Food Safety Behavior. , 1997, Journal of food protection.

[18]  G Gettinby,et al.  A quantitative risk assessment for the occurrence of campylobacter in chickens at the point of slaughter , 2001, Epidemiology and Infection.

[19]  G. Gettinby,et al.  A quantitative risk assessment for campylobacters in broilers: work in progress , 2002 .

[20]  Y Chen,et al.  Quantification and variability analysis of bacterial cross-contamination rates in common food service tasks. , 2001, Journal of food protection.

[21]  S. Fein,et al.  Prevalence of Selected Food Consumption and Preparation Behaviors Associated with Increased Risks of Food-borne Disease. , 1995, Journal of food protection.

[22]  A M Lammerding,et al.  Hazard identification and exposure assessment for microbial food safety risk assessment. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.