Computing budget allocation for efficient ranking and selection of variances with application to target tracking algorithms

This paper addresses the problem of ranking and selection for stochastic processes, such as target tracking algorithms, where variance is the performance metric. Comparison of different tracking algorithms or parameter sets within one algorithm relies on time-consuming and computationally demanding simulations. We present a method to minimize simulation time, yet to achieve a desirable confidence of the obtained results by applying ordinal optimization and computing budget allocation ideas and techniques, while taking into account statistical properties of the variance. The developed method is applied to a general tracking problem of N/sub s/ sensors tracking T targets using a sequential multi-sensor data fusion tracking algorithm. The optimization consists of finding the order of processing sensor information that results in the smallest variance of the position error. Results that we obtained with high confidence levels and in reduced simulation times confirm the findings from our previous research (where we considered only two sensors) that processing the best available sensor the last performs the best, on average. The presented method can be applied to any ranking and selection problem where variance is the performance metric.

[1]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Sonar tracking of multiple targets using joint probabilistic data association , 1983 .

[2]  Lucy Y. Pao,et al.  The optimal order of processing sensor information in sequential multisensor fusion algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Tracking in a cluttered environment with probabilistic data association , 1975, Autom..

[4]  Lucy Y. Pao,et al.  Centralized multisensor fusion algorithms for tracking applications , 1994 .

[5]  Chun-Hung Chen,et al.  Ordinal comparison of heuristic algorithms using stochastic optimization , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[6]  Richard M. Brugger Statistics for Engineering Problem Solving , 1993 .

[7]  Lucy Y. Pao,et al.  Alternatives to Monte-Carlo simulation evaluations of two multisensor fusion algorithms , 1998, Autom..

[8]  W. Dixon,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. , 1964 .

[9]  R. A. Fox,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Statistics , 1947 .

[10]  Y. Bar-Shalom Tracking and data association , 1988 .

[11]  N. Temme The asymptotic expansion of the incomplete gamma functions : (preprint) , 1977 .

[12]  Chun-Hung Chen,et al.  A gradient approach for smartly allocating computing budget for discrete event simulation , 1996, Proceedings Winter Simulation Conference.

[13]  Stephen B. Vardeman,et al.  Statistics for Engineering Problem Solving. , 1996 .

[14]  T. W. E. Lau,et al.  Universal Alignment Probabilities and Subset Selection for Ordinal Optimization , 1997 .

[15]  Chun-Hung Chen,et al.  Computing efforts allocation for ordinal optimization and discrete event simulation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[16]  C. Cassandras,et al.  Ordinal optimization for a class of deterministic and stochastic discrete resource allocation problems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[17]  Christos G. Cassandras,et al.  Ordinal optimisation and simulation , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[19]  Chun-Hung Chen A lower bound for the correct subset-selection probability and its application to discrete-event system simulations , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[20]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Detection thresholds for tracking in clutter--A connection between estimation and signal processing , 1985 .

[21]  Shanti S. Gupta,et al.  On selecting a subset containing the population with the smallest variance , 1962 .

[22]  Yu-Chi Ho,et al.  An Explanation of Ordinal Optimization: Soft Computing for hard Problems , 1999, Inf. Sci..