The impact of affect on memory of advertising

The impact of affect on memory has been considered by both advertising and neuroscience research. As part of testing a MAC (Memory superset of Affect superset of Cognition) model of the intermediate effects of advertising, four hypotheses were developed: ads with higher affective content would have higher recognition and recall, and subjects treated with beta-blockers (Propranolol), which interact with those brain regions known to mediate affect, would have lower recognition and recall than those treated with placebos. The hypotheses are tested and broadly supported. This exploratory research, taken in conjunction with previous work, indicates some ways in which affect enhances advertising effectiveness. We conclude with directions for further research and testing the MAC model.

[1]  James L. McGaugh,et al.  The amygdala and emotional memory , 1995, Nature.

[2]  Leonard M. Lodish,et al.  How T.V. Advertising Works: A Meta-Analysis of 389 Real World Split Cable T.V. Advertising Experiments , 1995 .

[3]  D. Moore,et al.  Affect Intensity: An Individual Difference Response to Advertising Appeals , 1995 .

[4]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Classical Conditioning Procedures on Subsequent Attention to the Conditioned Brand , 1993 .

[5]  D. Greenblatt,et al.  Cognitive effects of β‐adrenergic antagonists after single doses: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol, atenolol, lorazepam, and placebo , 1993, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[6]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Recognition versus Recall as Measures of Television Commercial Forgetting , 1988 .

[7]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences , 1982 .

[8]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? , 1981 .

[9]  E. D. Plessis,et al.  Recognition versus recall , 1994 .

[10]  Charles L. Wilson,et al.  Single Neuron Activity in Human Hippocampus and Amygdala during Recognition of Faces and Objects , 1997, Neuron.

[11]  P. Nedungadi.  Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations , 1990 .

[12]  T. Ambler,et al.  How Advertising Works: What Do We Really Know? , 1999 .

[13]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  Classical Conditioning of Consumer Attitudes: Four Experiments in an Advertising Context , 1987 .

[14]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: the Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why we Feel the Way we Do , 1989 .

[15]  Blair T. Johnson.  Insights about Attitudes: Meta-Analytic Perspectives , 1991 .

[16]  Joel S. Dubow.  Point of view: Recall revisited: Recall redux , 1994 .

[17]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Hemispherically Lateralized EEG as a Response to Television Commercials , 1988 .

[18]  A. Anderson,et al.  Emotional memory: What does the amygdala do? , 1997, Current Biology.

[19]  David A. Aaker,et al.  Warmth in Advertising: Measurement, Impact, and Sequence Effects , 1986 .

[20]  Yong J. Hyun,et al.  Predicting Memory for Components of TV Commercials from EEG , 1990 .