Right atrial pressure predicts hemodynamic response to apneic positive airway pressure

Objective: To evaluate if the preexistant filling state, assessed by right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), and right ventricular end‐diastolic volume index (EDVI), would define the subsequent hemodynamic effects of increases in airway pressure (Paw). Design: Prospective open clinical study. Setting: Postoperative intensive care unit, university hospital. Patients: Twenty‐two consecutive ventilator‐dependent patients with mild to severe acute lung injury with Murray scores (scoring infiltrates on chest radiograph, oxygenation index, lung compliance, and the level of positive end‐expiratory pressure) ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 without history of preexisting cardiopulmonary disease. Interventions: Paw varied during apnea from 0 to 10, 20, and 30 cm H2O using inspiratory hold maneuvers of 15 secs. Measurements and Main Results: Cardiac index and right ventricular ejection fraction were measured by the thermodilution technique. We made measurements in triplicate using manual injection of iced saline. Right ventricular volumes were calculated. Increasing Paw induced variable changes in cardiac index among subjects (+6% to −43% change from baseline 0 cm H2O Paw values), which correlated with percentage changes in both stroke index (r2 = .89) and right ventricular EDVI (r2 = .75), whereas heart rate and right ventricular ejection fraction did not change. The change in cardiac index from 0 to 30 cm H2O Paw correlated with baseline values for RAP, PAOP, and right ventricular EDVI (r2 = .68, .43, and .34, respectively, p < 0.01). Increases in RAP correlated with lung compliance if baseline RAP was >10 mm Hg but did not if it was ≤10 mm Hg. Similarly, patients with baseline RAP ≤10 mm Hg had a greater decrease in cardiac index than patients with a RAP >10 mm Hg (for 30 cm H2O Paw: −30% ± 9% vs. −8% ± 7%, p < .01). Conclusions: Apneic positive Paw decreased cardiac output mainly by reducing venous return. From the investigated filling variables, RAP was most sensitive in predicting the hemodynamic response, followed by PAOP and right ventricular EDVI. Patients with RAP ≤10 mm Hg, if subjected to aggressive positive pressure ventilation, are at risk of hemodynamic deterioration and organ hypoperfusion.

[1]  J. Dhainaut,et al.  Clinical Investigations in Critical CareRight Ventricular Function in Human Sepsis: A Thermodilution Study , 1997 .

[2]  M. Hiesmayr,et al.  Measurement of right ventricular performance during apnea in patients with acute lung injury. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  M. Pinsky,et al.  The hemodynamic consequences of mechanical ventilation: an evolving story , 1997, Intensive Care Medicine.

[4]  M. Pinsky,et al.  Dynamic right and left ventricular interactions in the rabbit: simultaneous measurement of ventricular pressure-volume loops. , 1996, Journal of critical care.

[5]  M. Pinsky,et al.  Cardiopulmonary effects of positive pressure ventilation during acute lung injury. , 1995, Chest.

[6]  G. Huemer,et al.  Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on right and left ventricular performance assessed by Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1994, Chest.

[7]  M R Pinsky,et al.  Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on right ventricular function in humans. , 1992, The American review of respiratory disease.

[8]  R. Wilson,et al.  End-diastolic volume. A better indicator of preload in the critically ill. , 1992, Archives of surgery.

[9]  K. Falke,et al.  Right ventricular function assessed by thermodilution technique during apnea and mechanical ventilation , 1991, Critical care medicine.

[10]  H. Miyano,et al.  Effects of injection site on the accuracy of thermal washout right ventricular ejection fraction measurements in clinical and model investigations. , 1991, Chest.

[11]  J. Bourdarias,et al.  Reevaluation of hemodynamic consequences of positive pressure ventilation: emphasis on cyclic right ventricular afterloading by mechanical lung inflation. , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[12]  J F Murray,et al.  An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[13]  J. Dhainaut,et al.  Mechanisms of decreased left ventricular preload during continuous positive pressure ventilation in ARDS. , 1986, Chest.

[14]  W J Keon,et al.  The relationship between pericardial pressure and right atrial pressure: an intraoperative study. , 1986, Circulation.

[15]  S. Ashok,et al.  Effect of antimony ion implantation on Al‐silicon Schottky diode characteristics , 1984 .

[16]  M. Pinsky.  Determinants of pulmonary arterial flow variation during respiration. , 1984, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[17]  W. Shoemaker,et al.  Reliability of clinical monitoring to assess blood volume in critically ill patients , 1984, Critical care medicine.

[18]  A. Righetti,et al.  Biventricular volumes and function in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with PEEP. , 1983, Chest.

[19]  J. Bogaard,et al.  Thermodilution technique for measurement of cardiac output during artificial ventilation. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[20]  J F Murray,et al.  Continuous Positive‐Pressure Ventilation Decreases Right and Left Ventricular End‐Diastolic Volumes in the Dog , 1980, Circulation research.

[21]  Tomoyuki Suzuki,et al.  Venous Pressure and Compliance of the Peripheral Capacitance Vessels , 1976, Angiology.

[22]  W. Martin,et al.  Hemodynamic Effects of Intermittent Positive Pressure Respiration , 1966, Anesthesiology.

[23]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Alterations in Central Blood Volume and Cardiac Output Induced by Positive Pressure Breathing and Counteracted by Metaraminol (Aramine) , 1957, Circulation research.

[24]  H. Fessler,et al.  Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on the canine venous return curve. , 1992, The American review of respiratory disease.

[25]  H. Fessler,et al.  Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on the gradient for venous return. , 1991, The American review of respiratory disease.

[26]  A. Guyton,et al.  Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves. , 1955, Physiological reviews.