Two eyes make a pair: facial organization and perceptual learning reduce visual extinction

We examined a patient with left spatial neglect and visual extinction due to right parietal damage in tasks where identical stimuli were presented before and after they were primed so as to be perceived as the eyes of schematic faces. In a first block, we presented alphanumeric stimuli (+, o, T, 6) on the right, left, or both sides of fixation on a blank background, and established that the patient could perceive unilateral stimuli on either side but extinguished most of the left-sided ones in the bilateral trials. In a second block, some of these stimuli (+, o) were presented again, but now in the position of eyes within the context of an oval frame which created the impression of a schematic face. Other stimuli (T, 6) were presented as previously on a blank background for an equal number of trials. In the third critical block, all stimuli were presented once again on a blank background, as in the first block. Now the patient extinguished very few of those left-sided stimuli primed to be seen as a pair of eyes in face configuration (+, o), but still extinguished most of the other stimuli (T, 6). A second control experiment showed no effect of repeatedly exposing stimuli in a common region of space defined by meaningless shape boundaries. These results suggest that facial organization can group eye features before the level where attentional selection or extinction occurs, and that such grouping may be influenced by rapid perceptual learning.

[1]  C. Frith,et al.  Unconscious activation of visual cortex in the damaged right hemisphere of a parietal patient with extinction. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  T Landis,et al.  Illusory contours and spatial neglect , 1998, Neuroreport.

[3]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Priming Visual Face-Processing Mechanisms: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2002, Psychological science.

[4]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping and Extinction: Evidence for Low-level Modulation of Visual Selection , 1996 .

[5]  T. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Current opinion in neurobiology , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  S. Palmer Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Extinction as a paradigm measure of attentional bias and restricted capacity. , 1997 .

[8]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[9]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Explicit and implicit perception of illusory contours in unilateral spatial neglect: behavioural and anatomical correlates of preattentive grouping mechanisms , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Jon Driver,et al.  Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection , 1994 .

[11]  R. Rafal,et al.  Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: A combined event-related fMRI and ERP study , 2001 .

[12]  D. Sagi,et al.  Visual extinction and cortical connectivity in human vision. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Long-range interactions in visual perception , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  R. Rafal,et al.  Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: A combined event-related functional MRI and event-related potential study , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Purcell,et al.  The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  B. Julesz,et al.  Context Superiority in a Detection Task with Line-Element Stimuli: A Low-Level Effect , 1990, Perception.

[17]  Peter Thier,et al.  Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3D Space , 1997 .

[18]  Jon Driver,et al.  Object segmentation and visual neglect , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  I. Rock,et al.  Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. , 1998 .

[20]  A. Young,et al.  Facial neglect , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  Faces call for attention: evidence from patients with visual extinction , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  FACIAL ORGANIZATION BLOCKS ACCESS TO LOW-LEVEL FEATURES: AN OBJECT INFERIORITY EFFECT , 1995 .

[23]  R. Rafal,et al.  "Both" means more than "two": localizing and counting in patients with visuospatial neglect , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Zemel,et al.  Object-Based Attention and Occlusion Evidence From Normal Participants and a Computational Model , 1998 .