Performance of basic kinematic thresholds in the identification of crash and near-crash events within naturalistic driving data.

Understanding causal factors for traffic safety-critical events (e.g., crashes and near-crashes) is an important step in reducing their frequency and severity. Naturalistic driving data offers unparalleled insight into these factors, but requires identification of situations where crashes are present within large volumes of data. Sensitivity and specificity of these identification approaches are key to minimizing the resources required to validate candidate crash events. This investigation used data from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study (SHRP 2 NDS) and the Canada Naturalistic Driving Study (CNDS) to develop and validate different kinematic thresholds that can be used to detect crash events. Results indicate that the sensitivity of many of these approaches can be quite low, but can be improved by selecting particular threshold levels based on detection performance. Additional improvements in these approaches are possible, and may involve leveraging combinations of different detection approaches, including advanced statistical techniques and artificial intelligence approaches, additional parameter modifications, and automation of validation processes.

[1]  Paul P Jovanis,et al.  Screening Naturalistic Driving Study Data for Safety-Critical Events , 2013 .

[2]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Naturalistic Driving Study: Technical Coordination and Quality Control , 2014 .

[3]  Trent Victor,et al.  Sweden-Michigan Naturalistic Field Operational Test (SeMiFOT), Phase 1: WP5 Evaluation of Methodology. Final Report , 2010 .

[4]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Development of a method for detecting jerks in safety critical events. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Steering Entropy Revisited , 2017 .

[6]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Jerky driving--An indicator of accident proneness? , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Ronald R Knipling,et al.  Naturalistic Driving Events: No Harm, No Foul, No Validity , 2017 .

[8]  Brian L. Smith,et al.  Identification of safety-critical events using kinematic vehicle data and the discrete fourier transform. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Chunking: a procedure to improve naturalistic data analysis. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Use of Drivers’ Jerk Profiles in Computer Vision–Based Traffic Safety Evaluations , 2014 .

[11]  Thomas G. Dietterich Multiple Classifier Systems , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  John D Lee,et al.  Extending parental mentoring using an event-triggered video intervention in rural teen drivers. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[13]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Taxonomy for characterizing ensemble methods in classification tasks: A review and annotated bibliography , 2009, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[14]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[15]  R. Foss,et al.  Distracted driver behaviors and distracting conditions among adolescent drivers: findings from a naturalistic driving study. , 2014, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[16]  Anders af Wåhlberg Speed choice versus celeration behavior as traffic accident predictor. , 2006 .

[17]  Lutz Eckstein,et al.  Incident Detection Based on Vehicle CAN-Data Within the Large Scale Field Operational Test “euroFOT” , 2011 .

[18]  Rebecca L Olson,et al.  The Impact of Hand-Held and Hands-Free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk , 2013 .

[19]  Jeremy D. Sudweeks Using Functional Classification to Enhance Naturalistic Driving Data Crash/Near Crash Algorithms , 2015 .

[20]  Thomas A Dingus,et al.  Naturalistic assessment of novice teenage crash experience. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  John D. Lee,et al.  Using an event-triggered video intervention system to expand the supervised learning of newly licensed adolescent drivers. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[22]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Recognising safety critical events: can automatic video processing improve naturalistic data analyses? , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Neeraj Saxena,et al.  A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN 1 HISTORICAL CRASH AND NATURALISTIC DRIVING 2 3 , 2017 .

[24]  Jonathan M. Hankey,et al.  Description of the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Database and the Crash, Near-Crash, and Baseline Data Sets , 2016 .