Combined analysis of unique and repetitive events in quantitative risk assessment

For risk assessment to be a relevant tool in the study of any type of system or activity, it needs to be based on a framework that allows for jointly analyzing both unique and repetitive events. Separately, unique events may be handled by predictive probability assignments on the events, and repetitive events with unknown/uncertain frequencies are typically handled by the probability of frequency (or Bayesian) approach. Regardless of the nature of the events involved, there may be a problem with imprecision in the probability assignments. Several uncertainty representations with the interpretation of lower and upper probability have been developed for reflecting such imprecision. In particular, several methods exist for jointly propagating precise and imprecise probabilistic input in the probability of frequency setting. In the present position paper we outline a framework for the combined analysis of unique and repetitive events in quantitative risk assessment using both precise and imprecise probability. In particular, we extend an existing method for jointly propagating probabilistic and possibilistic input by relaxing the assumption that all events involved have frequentist probabilities; instead we assume that frequentist probabilities may be introduced for some but not all events involved, i.e. some events are assumed to be unique and require predictive - possibly imprecise - probabilistic assignments, i.e. subjective probability assignments on the unique events without introducing underlying frequentist probabilities for these. A numerical example related to environmental risk assessment of the drilling of an oil well is included to illustrate the application of the resulting method. We formulate a set-up for combined analysis of unique and repetitive events in QRAWe extend an existing method joint probabilistic-possibilistic input propagationA numerical example related to environmental risk assessment is included

[1]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[2]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Soft Methods for Handling Variability and Imprecision , 2008 .

[3]  Weldon A. Lodwick,et al.  Fundamentals of Interval Analysis and Linkages to Fuzzy Set Theory , 2008 .

[4]  D. Lindley,et al.  Inference for a Bernoulli Process (a Bayesian View) , 1976 .

[5]  Stan Kaplan Will the real probability please stand up , 1988 .

[6]  Ramon E. Moore Methods and applications of interval analysis , 1979, SIAM studies in applied mathematics.

[7]  Aarnout Brombacher,et al.  Probability... , 2009, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[8]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments , 2003 .

[9]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representation, Propagation, and Decision Issues in Risk Analysis Under Incomplete Probabilistic Information , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Hybrid processing of stochastic and subjective uncertainty data , 1995 .

[11]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the Need for Restricting the Probabilistic Analysis in Risk Assessments to Variability , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Kurt Weichselberger The theory of interval-probability as a unifying concept for uncertainty , 2000, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[13]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Supremum Preserving Upper Probabilities , 1999, Inf. Sci..

[14]  G. Klir,et al.  On probability-possibility transformations , 1992 .

[15]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Joint propagation of probability and possibility in risk analysis: Towards a formal framework , 2007, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[16]  B. D. Finetti La prévision : ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives , 1937 .

[17]  由希 辻 Representation , 2020, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[18]  Subir Ghosh,et al.  Reliability and Risk: A Bayesian Perspective , 2008, Technometrics.

[19]  Radko Mesiar,et al.  Fuzzy Interval Analysis , 2000 .

[20]  Terje Aven,et al.  A risk concept applicable for both probabilistic and non-probabilistic perspectives , 2011 .

[21]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[23]  Gilles Mauris,et al.  Inferring a Possibility Distribution from Very Few Measurements , 2008, SMPS.

[24]  P. Limbourg,et al.  Fault tree analysis in an early design stage using the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence , 2007 .

[25]  Stan Kaplan Formalisms for handling phenomenological uncertainties: the concepts of probability, frequency, variability, and probability of frequency , 1993 .

[26]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[27]  Janette Cardoso,et al.  Uncertainty Handling in Quantitative BDD-Based Fault-Tree Analysis by Interval Computation , 2011, SUM.

[28]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[29]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representing partial ignorance , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[30]  H. D. De Kanter [The philosophy of statistics]. , 1972, Ginecología y Obstetricia de México.

[31]  Nozer D. Singpurwalla,et al.  Reliability and risk , 2006 .

[32]  Alyson G. Wilson,et al.  Probability, chance and the probability of chance , 2008 .

[33]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Formal Representations of Uncertainty , 2010, Decision-making Process.

[34]  T. Aven Foundations of risk analysis , 2003 .

[35]  G. A. Barnard,et al.  THE LOGIC OF STATISTICAL INFERENCE1 , 1972, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[36]  Victoria Montgomery,et al.  New statistical methods in risk assessment by probability bounds , 2009 .

[37]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Uncertainty in Risk Assessment: The Representation and Treatment of Uncertainties by Probabilistic and Non-Probabilistic Methods , 2013 .

[38]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Inclusion-exclusion principle for belief functions , 2013, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[39]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[40]  T. Aven,et al.  How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting , 2013 .

[41]  Terje Aven,et al.  The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessments for Characterizing Risk and Uncertainty and Delineating Appropriate Risk Management Options, with Special Emphasis on Terrorism Risk , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibility theory and statistical reasoning , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[43]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 2018, Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics.

[44]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[45]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Joint Propagation and Exploitation of Probabilistic and Possibilistic Information in Risk Assessment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[46]  Terje Aven,et al.  On when to base Event Trees and Fault Trees on Probability Models and Frequentist Probabilities in Quantitative Risk Assessments , 2012 .

[47]  P. Walley Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities , 1990 .

[48]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Random sets and fuzzy interval analysis , 1991 .

[49]  Stan Kaplan,et al.  The Words of Risk Analysis , 1997 .

[50]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Probability-Possibility Transformations, Triangular Fuzzy Sets, and Probabilistic Inequalities , 2004, Reliab. Comput..

[51]  D. Richards,et al.  Understanding uncertainty , 2012, Evidence-Based Dentistry.