Reasoning About Emotional and Neutral Materials

In two experiments, we investigated whether people reason differently when they reason about emotional and neutral contents. We gave participants a conditional reasoning task (“If p, then q”) and varied the emotionality of the items used as p and q. Participants were asked to draw inferences based on these statements. In Experiment 1, we compared statements including preexisting emotional and neutral words. In Experiment 2, we experimentally manipulated the emotionality of initially neutral words using classical conditioning. In both experiments, emotionality affected participants' responses. They were more likely to draw invalid inferences in response to emotional compared with neutral statements.

[1]  R. Sousa.  The rationality of emotion , 1991 .

[2]  P. French,et al.  Philosophy of emotions , 1998 .

[3]  A. Damasio.  Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[4]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Cortical correlates of semantic classical conditioning. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[5]  J. Morgan,et al.  The Distortion of Syllogistic Reasoning Produced by Personal Convictions , 1944 .

[6]  N. Frijda.  Emotions are functional, most of the time , 1994 .

[7]  V. Thompson.  CONDITIONAL REASONING: THE NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS , 1995 .

[8]  F. Attneave,et al.  The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory , 1949 .

[9]  Mary Henle,et al.  The Influence of Attitudes on Syllogistic Reasoning , 1956 .

[10]  John Dewey,et al.  The theory of emotion. , 1895 .

[11]  Todd Lubart,et al.  Conditional reasoning and causation , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Ken Manktelow,et al.  Reasoning and Thinking , 1999 .

[13]  P. D. de Jong,et al.  Conditional reasoning and phobic fear: evidence for a fear-confirming reasoning pattern. , 1997, Behaviour research and therapy.

[14]  M. Oaksford,et al.  Mood, reasoning, and central executive processes. , 1996 .

[15]  H. Markovits.  Familiarity Effects in Conditional Reasoning. , 1986 .

[16]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  A thoroughly modern gage , 1999 .

[17]  D. Keltner,et al.  Functional Accounts of Emotions , 1999 .

[18]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Individual differences in anxiety and the restriction of working memory capacity , 1993 .

[19]  H. Markovits,et al.  The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning , 2000, Cognition.

[21]  Carolyn H. John,et al.  Emotionality ratings and free-association norms of 240 emotional and non-emotional words , 1988 .

[22]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Classical conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about the attitude stimulus is low than high , 1992 .

[23]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  P. Pollard,et al.  On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[25]  M. Eysenck.  Anxiety and cognitive-task performance , 1985 .

[26]  Henry Markovits,et al.  Awareness of the ‘possible’ as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems , 1984 .

[27]  D. E. Over,et al.  Reasoning, decision making and rationality , 1993, Cognition.

[28]  Klaus Fiedler,et al.  Toward an integrative account of affect and cognition phenomena using the BIAS computer algorithm. , 2000 .