Simulation study of noise reduction methods for a split MRI system using a finite element method.

PURPOSE To evaluate the acoustic noise levels induced by the split-gradient coils of a MRI-LINAC system, and also propose a scheme for acoustic noise reduction. METHODS A finite element (FE) modeling method was used to simulate the acoustic environment of a MRI-LINAC system. By optimizing mounting supports between the split gradient assembly and the main magnet, the authors first altered the vibration modes of the acoustic system, smoothed the acoustic frequency responses, and relocated the acoustic field distribution in the central gap, cylindrical tunnels, and outside of the central gap. The acoustic noise was further reduced by means of applying damping treatment on the surfaces of the split-gradient assembly. RESULTS Compared with conventional bolts that were placed at the ends, when the near supports were fixed and the far adjustable supports were 40 cm away from the further (here near and far are relative to the central gap) ends of the split-gradient assembly, the overall average sound pressure level (SPL) reductions were about 6.3-9.9 dB both inside and outside the central gap for the transverse and longitudinal coils. After applying damping treatment, the average SPLs inside the central gap and outside it were further reduced by 8.5-12.5 and 6.3-8.8 dB for the transverse coils and longitudinal coils, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The authors' FE results showed that, for the cases of transverse coil and longitudinal coil switching, the overall average-SPL reduction quantities amounted to around 20 dB by applying the proposed noise reduction scheme, resulting in lower SPLs than the human hearing threshold.

[1]  R. Plunkett,et al.  Length Optimization for Constrained Viscoelastic Layer Damping , 1970 .

[2]  C. Cai,et al.  Minimizing vibration response of cylindrical shells through layout optimization of passive constrained layer damping treatments , 2005 .

[3]  N. Kiang,et al.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Chris K. Mechefske,et al.  Modal analysis and testing of a thin‐walled gradient coil cylinder model , 2005 .

[5]  H. Landes,et al.  Computer-aided design of clinical magnetic resonance imaging scanners by coupled magnetomechanical-acoustic modeling , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[6]  Chris K. Mechefske,et al.  Modal analysis and acoustic noise characterization of a 4T MRI gradient coil insert , 2004 .

[7]  R E Brummett,et al.  Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[8]  Y. Boyle,et al.  Acoustic noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging reduces pain unpleasantness ratings , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  A R Palmer,et al.  Sound‐Level Measurements and Calculations of Safe Noise Dosage During EPI at 3 T , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  M. Schmidt,et al.  Effect of MRI noise on cochlear function , 2002, The Lancet.

[11]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Acoustic analysis for a split MRI system using FE method , 2015 .

[12]  Revadi Govindaraju,et al.  Hearing loss after noise exposure. , 2011, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[13]  J. M. Biggerstaff Vibrational Damping of Composite Materials , 2006 .

[14]  C. Cai,et al.  Modeling of Material Damping Properties in ANSYS , 2002 .

[15]  C. K. Mechefske,et al.  Characterization of vibration and acoustic noise in a gradient-coil insert , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[16]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Fundamentals of Acoustics , 2006 .

[17]  Chris K. Mechefske,et al.  Vibration and Acoustic Noise Characterization of a Gradient Coil Insert in a 4 T MRI , 2004 .

[18]  Chris K. Mechefske,et al.  Acoustic analysis of a gradient coil winding in an MRI scanner , 2005 .

[19]  Hui Zheng,et al.  Optimization of partial constrained layer damping treatment for vibrational energy minimization of vibrating beams , 2004 .