Compound optimal allocation for individual and collective ethics in binary clinical trials

In recent years, several authors have investigated response-adaptive allocation rules for comparative clinical trials, in order to favour, at each stage of the trial, the treatment that appears to be best. In this paper, we define admissible allocations, namely treatment assignments that cannot be simultaneously improved upon with respect to both a specific design criterion, reflecting the inferential properties of the experiment, and the proportion of patients assigned to the best treatment or treatments; we survey existing designs from this viewpoint. We also suggest combining information and ethical considerations by taking a suitable weighted mean of two corresponding standardized criteria, with weights that depend on the actual treatment effects. This compound criterion leads to a locally optimal allocation that can be targeted by some response-adaptive randomization rule. The paper mainly deals with the case of two treatments, but the suggested methodology is shown to extend to more than two. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  A play-the-winner-type urn design with reduced variability , 2003 .

[2]  M. Zelen,et al.  Play the Winner Rule and the Controlled Clinical Trial , 1969 .

[3]  Anna Maria Paganoni,et al.  A randomly reinforced urn , 2006 .

[4]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Optimality, Variability, Power , 2003 .

[5]  Alessandra Giovagnoli,et al.  On the Large Sample Optimality of Sequential Designs for Comparing Two or More Treatments , 2005 .

[6]  N Stallard,et al.  Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials , 2001, Biometrics.

[7]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Randomized Play-the-Winner Rule in Medical Trials , 1978 .

[8]  C. Assaid,et al.  The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials , 2007 .

[9]  The doubly adaptive weighted differences design , 2006 .

[10]  Holger Dette,et al.  Compound Optimal Designs for Percentile Estimation in Dose-Response Models with Restricted Design Intervals , 2007 .

[11]  Uttam Bandyopadhyay,et al.  A covariate adjusted two‐stage allocation design for binary responses in randomized clinical trials , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Weng Kee Wong,et al.  On the Equivalence of Constrained and Compound Optimal Designs , 1994 .

[13]  K. Chaloner,et al.  The Equivalence of Constrained and Weighted Designs in Multiple Objective Design Problems , 1996 .

[14]  Holger Dette,et al.  Designing Experiments with Respect to ‘Standardized’ Optimality Criteria , 1997 .

[15]  Maroussa Zagoraiou,et al.  Covariate Adjusted Designs for Combining Efficiency, Ethics and Randomness in Normal Response Trials , 2010 .

[16]  S. D. Durham,et al.  A sequential design for maximizing the probability of a favourable response , 1998 .

[17]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Asymptotically best response-adaptive randomization procedures , 2006 .

[18]  F. Pukelsheim.  Optimal Design of Experiments , 1993 .

[19]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Implementing Optimal Allocation in Sequential Binary Response Experiments , 2007 .

[20]  N. Flournoy,et al.  Asymptotics in response-adaptive designs generated by a two-color, randomly reinforced urn , 2009, 0904.0350.