What a difference a decade makes: Insights into translesion DNA synthesis

Living organisms are continually under attack from a vast array of DNA-damaging agents that imperils their genomic integrity. As a consequence, cells posses an army of enzymes to repair their damaged chromosomes. However, DNA lesions often persist and pose a considerable threat to survival, because they can block the cell's replicase and its ability to complete genome duplication. It has been clear for many years that cells must possess a mechanism whereby the DNA lesion could be tolerated and physically bypassed. Yet it was only within the past decade that specialized DNA polymerases for “translesion DNA synthesis” or “TLS” were identified and characterized. Many of the TLS enzymes belong to the recently described “Y-family” of DNA polymerases. By possessing a spacious preformed active site, these enzymes can physically accommodate a variety of DNA lesions and facilitate their bypass. Flexible DNA-binding domains and a variable binding pocket for the replicating base pair further allow these TLS polymerases to select specific lesions to bypass and favor distinct non-Watson–Crick base pairs. Consequently, TLS polymerases tend to exhibit much lower fidelity than the cell's replicase when copying normal DNA, which results in a dramatic increase in mutagenesis. Occasionally this can be beneficial, but it often speeds the onset of cancer in humans. Cells use both transcriptional and posttranslational regulation to keep these low-fidelity polymerases under strict control and limit their access to a replication fork. Our perspective focuses on the mechanistic insights into TLS by the Y-family polymerases, how they are regulated, and their effects on genomic (in)stability that have been described in the past decade.

[1]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Translesion synthesis: Y-family polymerases and the polymerase switch. , 2007, DNA repair.

[2]  S. Jentsch,et al.  PCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork , 2007, Cell.

[3]  M. Egli,et al.  Molecular Basis of Selectivity of Nucleoside Triphosphate Incorporation Opposite O6-Benzylguanine by Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA Polymerase Dpo4 , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  William L. Neeley,et al.  DNA Polymerase V Allows Bypass of Toxic Guanine Oxidation Products in Vivo* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Evidence that in xeroderma pigmentosum variant cells, which lack DNA polymerase eta, DNA polymerase iota causes the very high frequency and unique spectrum of UV-induced mutations. , 2007, Cancer research.

[6]  Kevin A. Fiala,et al.  Mechanism of Abasic Lesion Bypass Catalyzed by a Y-family DNA Polymerase* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  M. Skoneczny,et al.  Polymerase eta is a short-lived, proteasomally degraded protein that is temporarily stabilized following UV irradiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  S. Li,et al.  Structure of the ubiquitin‐binding zinc finger domain of human DNA Y‐polymerase η , 2007, EMBO reports.

[9]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Human DNA Polymerase κ Encircles DNA: Implications for Mismatch Extension and Lesion Bypass , 2007 .

[10]  M. Egli,et al.  Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA Polymerase Dpo4 Is Partially Inhibited by “Wobble” Pairing between O6-Methylguanine and Cytosine, but Accurate Bypass Is Preferred* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  P. Plevani,et al.  Yeast Rev1 is cell cycle regulated, phosphorylated in response to DNA damage and its binding to chromosomes is dependent upon MEC1. , 2007, DNA repair.

[12]  S. Markowitz,et al.  Human SHPRH suppresses genomic instability through proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  R. Kucherlapati,et al.  Participation of mouse DNA polymerase ι in strand-biased mutagenic bypass of UV photoproducts and suppression of skin cancer , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Hurwitz,et al.  Human SHPRH is a ubiquitin ligase for Mms2–Ubc13-dependent polyubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. Tsukamoto,et al.  UV-B Radiation Induces Epithelial Tumors in Mice Lacking DNA Polymerase η and Mesenchymal Tumors in Mice Deficient for DNA Polymerase ι , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  I. Dikic,et al.  Ubiquitin-Binding Motifs in REV1 Protein Are Required for Its Role in the Tolerance of DNA Damage , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  E. Loechler,et al.  Homology modeling of four Y-family, lesion-bypass DNA polymerases: the case that E. coli Pol IV and human Pol kappa are orthologs, and E. coli Pol V and human Pol eta are orthologs. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[18]  R. Woodgate,et al.  RecA acts in trans to allow replication of damaged DNA by DNA polymerase V , 2006, Nature.

[19]  F. Guengerich,et al.  Translesion Synthesis across Bulky N2-Alkyl Guanine DNA Adducts by Human DNA Polymerase κ* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  E. Friedberg,et al.  REV1 protein interacts with PCNA: significance of the REV1 BRCT domain in vitro and in vivo. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[21]  Kenneth A. Johnson,et al.  A new paradigm for DNA polymerase specificity. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[22]  S. Velasco-Miguel,et al.  Elevated mutation rates in the germline of Polκ mutant male mice , 2006 .

[23]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Controlling the subcellular localization of DNA polymerases ι and η via interactions with ubiquitin , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[24]  G. Walker,et al.  The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G(2)/M phase rather than S phase. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  P. Lambin,et al.  Lysine 63-Polyubiquitination Guards against Translesion Synthesis–Induced Mutations , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[26]  A. Lehmann,et al.  The Y-family DNA polymerase κ (pol κ) functions in mammalian nucleotide-excision repair , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  Jae Young Lee,et al.  Making and breaking nucleic acids: two-Mg2+-ion catalysis and substrate specificity. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[28]  F. Hanaoka,et al.  A Novel Role of DNA Polymerase η in Modulating Cellular Sensitivity to Chemotherapeutic Agents , 2006, Molecular Cancer Research.

[29]  J. Sale,et al.  The catalytic activity of REV1 is employed during immunoglobulin gene diversification in DT40. , 2006, Molecular immunology.

[30]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Normal hypermutation in antibody genes from congenic mice defective for DNA polymerase iota. , 2006, DNA repair.

[31]  N. de Wind,et al.  Strand-biased defect in C/G transversions in hypermutating immunoglobulin genes in Rev1-deficient mice , 2006, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[32]  E. Kool,et al.  Varying DNA base-pair size in subangstrom increments: evidence for a loose, not large, active site in low-fidelity Dpo4 polymerase. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[33]  Adrianna Skoneczna,et al.  Analysis of the spontaneous mutator phenotype associated with 20S proteasome deficiency in S. cerevisiae. , 2006, Mutation research.

[34]  C. M. Joyce,et al.  DNA polymerase catalysis in the absence of Watson-Crick hydrogen bonds: analysis by single-turnover kinetics. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[35]  J. Essigmann,et al.  A single amino acid governs enhanced activity of DinB DNA polymerases on damaged templates , 2006, Nature.

[36]  Yuan Cheng,et al.  Stepwise Translocation of Dpo4 Polymerase during Error-Free Bypass of an oxoG Lesion , 2006, PLoS biology.

[37]  M. Egli,et al.  Efficient and High Fidelity Incorporation of dCTP Opposite 7,8-Dihydro-8-oxodeoxyguanosine by Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA Polymerase Dpo4* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Localization of Y-family polymerases and the DNA polymerase switch in mammalian cells. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[39]  P. Burgers,et al.  Ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen activates translesion DNA polymerases eta and REV1. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  G. Wider,et al.  Ubiquitin-Binding Domains in Y-Family Polymerases Regulate Translesion Synthesis , 2005, Science.

[41]  K. Nozaki,et al.  Dual roles for DNA polymerase eta in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[42]  S. West,et al.  Human DNA polymerase eta promotes DNA synthesis from strand invasion intermediates of homologous recombination. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[43]  M. Albertella,et al.  A role for polymerase eta in the cellular tolerance to cisplatin-induced damage. , 2005, Cancer research.

[44]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Human DNA polymerase iota incorporates dCTP opposite template G via a G.C + Hoogsteen base pair. , 2005, Structure.

[45]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Rev1 Employs a Novel Mechanism of DNA Synthesis Using a Protein Template , 2005, Science.

[46]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  A sliding-clamp toolbelt binds high- and low-fidelity DNA polymerases simultaneously. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[47]  Jimin Wang,et al.  DNA polymerases: Hoogsteen base-pairing in DNA replication? , 2005, Nature.

[48]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Fidelity of Dpo4: effect of metal ions, nucleotide selection and pyrophosphorolysis , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[49]  G. Waksman,et al.  Motions of the fingers subdomain of klentaq1 are fast and not rate limiting: implications for the molecular basis of fidelity in DNA polymerases. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[50]  I. Rogozin,et al.  DNA Polymerase η Contributes to Strand Bias of Mutations of A versus T in Immunoglobulin Genes1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[51]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. , 2005, Annual review of biochemistry.

[52]  E. Friedberg,et al.  Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? , 2005, Molecular cell.

[53]  S. Yamada,et al.  Normal immunoglobulin gene somatic hypermutation in Polκ–Polι double-deficient mice , 2005 .

[54]  H. Matsushita,et al.  Genetic linkage between Polι deficiency and increased susceptibility to lung tumors in mice , 2005, Cancer science.

[55]  F. Delbos,et al.  Contribution of DNA polymerase η to immunoglobulin gene hypermutation in the mouse , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[56]  Wei Yang Portraits of a Y‐family DNA polymerase , 2005, FEBS letters.

[57]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Localisation of human Y-family DNA polymerase κ: relationship to PCNA foci , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[58]  S. Chaney,et al.  Recognition and processing of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-DNA adducts. , 2005, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[59]  Z. Livneh,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Translesion DNA Synthesis across a Benzo[a]pyrene-Guanine Adduct in Mammalian Cells , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[60]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen-dependent Coordination of the Biological Functions of Human DNA Polymerase ι* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[61]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Co-localization in replication foci and interaction of human Y-family members, DNA polymerase pol eta and REVl protein. , 2004, DNA repair.

[62]  Michio Kawasuji,et al.  Rad18 guides polη to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[63]  S. Chaney,et al.  The Role of DNA Polymerase η in Translesion Synthesis Past Platinum–DNA Adducts in Human Fibroblasts , 2004, Cancer Research.

[64]  S. Broyde,et al.  The Spacious Active Site of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase Facilitates Promiscuous Nucleotide Incorporation Opposite a Bulky Carcinogen-DNA Adduct , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[65]  T. Steitz,et al.  Mechanism of transfer RNA maturation by CCA-adding enzyme without using an oligonucleotide template , 2004, Nature.

[66]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Crystal structure of the catalytic core of human DNA polymerase kappa. , 2004, Structure.

[67]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Investigating the Role of the Little Finger Domain of Y-family DNA Polymerases in Low Fidelity Synthesis and Translesion Replication* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[68]  Satya Prakash,et al.  Replication by human DNA polymerase-ι occurs by Hoogsteen base-pairing , 2004, Nature.

[69]  Y. Murakumo,et al.  Interaction of hREV1 with three human Y‐family DNA polymerases , 2004, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[70]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[71]  F. Hanaoka,et al.  Translesion Synthesis past Tamoxifen-derived DNA Adducts by Human DNA Polymerases η and κ , 2004 .

[72]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Switching from high-fidelity replicases to low-fidelity lesion-bypass polymerases. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[73]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Pol ι Is a Candidate for the Mouse Pulmonary Adenoma Resistance 2 Locus, a Major Modifier of Chemically Induced Lung Neoplasia , 2004, Cancer Research.

[74]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Snapshots of replication through an abasic lesion; structural basis for base substitutions and frameshifts. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[75]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Preferential cis–syn thymine dimer bypass by DNA polymerase η occurs with biased fidelity , 2004, Nature.

[76]  D. Jerina,et al.  Crystal structure of a benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide adduct in a ternary complex with a DNA polymerase. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  J. Wagner,et al.  Structural and biochemical analysis of sliding clamp/ligand interactions suggest a competition between replicative and translesion DNA polymerases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[78]  Kevin A. Fiala,et al.  Pre-steady-state kinetic studies of the fidelity of Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[79]  Takesi Kato,et al.  Isolation and characterization of mutants of Escherichia coli deficient in induction of mutations by ultraviolet light , 1977, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[80]  M. Freundlich,et al.  Detection of messenger RNA from the isoleucine-valine operons of Salmonella typhimurium by heterologous DNA-RNA hybridization: Involvement of transfer RNA in transcriptional repression , 1977, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[81]  C. Lawrence Cellular functions of DNA polymerase zeta and Rev1 protein. , 2004, Advances in protein chemistry.

[82]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Functions of DNA polymerases. , 2004, Advances in protein chemistry.

[83]  K. Kamiya,et al.  Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[84]  Laurence H Pearl,et al.  Structural basis for recruitment of translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV/DinB to the β‐clamp , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[85]  E. G. Frank,et al.  Sequence context-dependent replication of DNA templates containing UV-induced lesions by human DNA polymerase iota. , 2003, DNA repair.

[86]  Philipp Stelter,et al.  Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation , 2003, Nature.

[87]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Replication of a cis–syn thymine dimer at atomic resolution , 2003, Nature.

[88]  E. G. Frank,et al.  129-derived Strains of Mice Are Deficient in DNA Polymerase ι and Have Normal Immunoglobulin Hypermutation , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[89]  Y. Sasaki,et al.  Analysis of lung tumorigenesis in chimeric mice indicates the Pulmonary adenoma resistance 2 (Par2) locus to operate in the tumor-initiation stage in a cell-autonomous manner: detection of polymorphisms in the Polı gene as a candidate for Par2 , 2003, Oncogene.

[90]  Yanbin Zhang,et al.  Effects of base sequence context on translesion synthesis past a bulky (+)-trans-anti-B[a]P-N2-dG lesion catalyzed by the Y-family polymerase pol kappa. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[91]  Wei Yang Damage repair DNA polymerases Y. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[92]  S. Bell,et al.  A heterotrimeric PCNA in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[93]  R. Fuchs,et al.  How DNA lesions are turned into mutations within cells? , 2002, Oncogene.

[94]  Samuel H. Wilson,et al.  Efficiency of Correct Nucleotide Insertion Governs DNA Polymerase Fidelity* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[95]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Localization of DNA polymerases η and ι to the replication machinery is tightly co‐ordinated in human cells , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[96]  Y. Shinkai,et al.  Polκ protects mammalian cells against the lethal and mutagenic effects of benzo[a]pyrene , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[97]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  DNA polymerase κ deficiency does not affect somatic hypermutation in mice , 2002, European journal of immunology.

[98]  Boris Pfander,et al.  RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO , 2002, Nature.

[99]  Yanbin Zhang,et al.  trans-Lesion Synthesis Past Bulky Benzo[a]pyrene Diol Epoxide N 2-dG and N 6-dA Lesions Catalyzed by DNA Bypass Polymerases* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[100]  Ming-Daw Tsai,et al.  A reexamination of the nucleotide incorporation fidelity of DNA polymerases. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[101]  Yanbin Zhang,et al.  Activities of human DNA polymerase kappa in response to the major benzo[a]pyrene DNA adduct: error-free lesion bypass and extension synthesis from opposite the lesion. , 2002, DNA repair.

[102]  A. Grollman,et al.  Translesion synthesis by human DNA polymerase kappa on a DNA template containing a single stereoisomer of dG-(+)- or dG-(-)-anti-N(2)-BPDE (7,8-dihydroxy-anti-9,10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene). , 2002, Biochemistry.

[103]  D. Jerina,et al.  Efficiency and Accuracy of SOS-induced DNA Polymerases Replicating Benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-diol 9,10-Epoxide A and G Adducts* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[104]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Human DINB1-encoded DNA polymerase κ is a promiscuous extender of mispaired primer termini , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[105]  M. Goodman Error-prone repair DNA polymerases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. , 2002, Annual review of biochemistry.

[106]  E. Koonin,et al.  Eukaryotic DNA Polymerases: Proposal for a Revised Nomenclature* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[107]  L. Silvian,et al.  Crystal structure of a DinB family error-prone DNA polymerase from Sulfolobus solfataricus , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[108]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action A Mechanism for Error-Prone and Lesion-Bypass Replication , 2001, Cell.

[109]  B. Dalrymple,et al.  A universal protein–protein interaction motif in the eubacterial DNA replication and repair systems , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[110]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Structure of the catalytic core of S. cerevisiae DNA polymerase eta: implications for translesion DNA synthesis. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[111]  T. Steitz,et al.  Crystal structure of a DinB lesion bypass DNA polymerase catalytic fragment reveals a classic polymerase catalytic domain. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[112]  L. Prakash,et al.  Interaction with PCNA is essential for yeast DNA polymerase eta function. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[113]  T. Kunkel,et al.  The Y-family of DNA polymerases. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[114]  P. Gearhart,et al.  DNA polymerase η is an A-T mutator in somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin variable genes , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[115]  J. Wagner,et al.  The beta clamp targets DNA polymerase IV to DNA and strongly increases its processivity. , 2000, EMBO reports.

[116]  Fenghua Yuan,et al.  Error-free and error-prone lesion bypass by human DNA polymerase κ in vitro , 2000 .

[117]  J P McDonald,et al.  Misinsertion and bypass of thymine–thymine dimers by human DNA polymerase ι , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[118]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Subunit‐specific degradation of the UmuD/D′ heterodimer by the ClpXP protease: the role of trans recognition in UmuD′ stability , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[119]  Fenghua Yuan,et al.  Preferential Incorporation of G Opposite Template T by the Low-Fidelity Human DNA Polymerase ι , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[120]  J. Wagner,et al.  Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase IV Mutator Activity: Genetic Requirements and Mutational Specificity , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[121]  P E Gibbs,et al.  Evidence for a second function for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rev1p , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[122]  Satya Prakash,et al.  Eukaryotic polymerases ι and ζ act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions , 2000, Nature.

[123]  E. G. Frank,et al.  poliota, a remarkably error-prone human DNA polymerase. , 2000, Genes & development.

[124]  F. Hanaoka,et al.  Error-prone bypass of certain DNA lesions by the human DNA polymerase kappa. , 2000, Genes & development.

[125]  F. Hanaoka,et al.  Mechanisms of accurate translesion synthesis by human DNA polymerase η , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[126]  F. Hanaoka,et al.  Efficient translesion replication past oxaliplatin and cisplatin GpG adducts by human DNA polymerase eta. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[127]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  The human DINB1 gene encodes the DNA polymerase Poltheta. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[128]  Satya Prakash,et al.  Fidelity of Human DNA Polymerase η* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[129]  T. Tsurimoto PCNA binding proteins. , 1999, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[130]  Z. Livneh,et al.  The Mutagenesis Protein UmuC Is a DNA Polymerase Activated by UmuD′, RecA, and SSB and Is Specialized for Translesion Replication* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[131]  T. Ogi,et al.  Mutation enhancement by DINB1, a mammalian homologue of the Escherichia coli mutagenesis protein DinB , 1999, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[132]  E. Koonin,et al.  Human and mouse homologs of Escherichia coli DinB (DNA polymerase IV), members of the UmuC/DinB superfamily. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[133]  R. Woodgate A plethora of lesion-replicating DNA polymerases. , 1999, Genes & development.

[134]  J. Epstein,et al.  Novel human and mouse homologs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase eta. , 1999, Genomics.

[135]  E. G. Frank,et al.  UmuD'(2)C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[136]  J. Wagner,et al.  The dinB gene encodes a novel E. coli DNA polymerase, DNA pol IV, involved in mutagenesis. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[137]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. , 1999, Science.

[138]  Chikahide Masutani,et al.  The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase η , 1999, Nature.

[139]  F. Hanaoka,et al.  Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP‐V) correcting protein from HeLa cells has a thymine dimer bypass DNA polymerase activity , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[140]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Poleta. , 1999, Science.

[141]  E. G. Frank,et al.  Lon-mediated proteolysis of the Escherichia coli UmuD mutagenesis protein: in vitro degradation and identification of residues required for proteolysis. , 1998, Genes & development.

[142]  M. Yamada,et al.  Multiple pathways for SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: an overexpression of dinB/dinP results in strongly enhancing mutagenesis in the absence of any exogenous treatment to damage DNA. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[143]  J P McDonald,et al.  Is Dna Damage Inducible and Functions in a Novel Error-free Postreplication Repair Mechanism , 1997 .

[144]  J. F. Connaughton,et al.  Identification of a DinB/UmuC homolog in the archeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. , 1996, Mutation research.

[145]  E. G. Frank,et al.  Regulation of SOS mutagenesis by proteolysis. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[146]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Deoxycytidyl transferase activity of yeast REV1 protein , 1996, Nature.

[147]  E. Ciccotti,et al.  Micronucleus test in erythrocytes of Barbus plebejus (Teleostei, Pisces) from two natural environments: a bioassay for the in situ detection of mutagens in freshwater. , 1996, Mutation research.

[148]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Novel mutagenic properties of abasic sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[149]  H. Ohmori,et al.  dinP, a new gene in Escherichia coli, whose product shows similarities to UmuC and its homologues. , 1995, Mutation research.

[150]  F. Galibert,et al.  New recA mutations that dissociate the various RecA protein activities in Escherichia coli provide evidence for an additional role for RecA protein in UV mutagenesis , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[151]  F. Larimer,et al.  The REV1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation, sequence, and functional analysis , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[152]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Mutagenic repair in Escherichia coli: products of the recA gene and of the umuD and umuC genes act at different steps in UV-induced mutagenesis. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[153]  C. Kenyon,et al.  Inducibility of a gene product required for UV and chemical mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[154]  Gerhard Steinborn,et al.  Uvm mutants of Escherichia coli K12 deficient in UV mutagenesis. I. Isolation of uvm mutants and their phenotypical characterization in DNA repair and mutagenesis. , 1978 .

[155]  C. Lawrence,et al.  UV mutagenesis in radiation-sensitive strains of yeast. , 1976, Genetics.

[156]  J. Lemontt,et al.  Mutants of yeast defective in mutation induced by ultraviolet light. , 1971, Genetics.