The Development of the Systemic Approach to Innovation

This chapter provides an overview and synthesis of the literature relating to the national innovation systems (NIS) approach. First, an overview of the historic development of the systemic approach to innovation is provided. It is influenced by the interactive learning and evolutionary theory as well by the concepts of capabilities and path dependency. Although the approach has developed from the mid-1980s, there are still a number of inconsistencies between different approaches toward innovation system. The main criticism relates to the difficulties of setting boundaries to the system; problems with providing dynamic view to the system and overall vagueness in operationalizing the innovation system concept. The chapter shows different ways proposed to overcome those weaknesses. Focusing on the functional side of the innovation system helps to eliminate or at least diminish some criticisms. The clearly stated functions of the NIS help to bound it and allows linking public policy measures to the areas where its functioning is not efficient and system failures exists. The chapter ends by focusing on the issues related to system failures as a reason for public sector interventions. Here concepts of failures such as infrastructural, capabilities, and governance failures are discussed. Framework for classifying system failures is also developed, which helps to answer the questions – where and when should the public sector intervene.

[1]  Javier M. Ekboir,et al.  Research and technology policies in innovation systems: zero tillage in Brazil , 2003 .

[2]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Economic Development and the National System of Innovation Approach , 2003 .

[3]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[4]  C. Freeman.  Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems--complementarity and economic growth , 2002 .

[5]  M. Teubal.  What is the systems perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy(ITP) and how can we apply it to developing and newly industrialized economies , 2002 .

[6]  J. Howells.  Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[7]  L. Georghiou,et al.  Public procurement and innovation?Resurrecting the demand side , 2007 .

[8]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  A Framework for Guiding Policy-makers Intervening in Emerging Innovation Systems in ‘Catching-Up’ Countries , 2006 .

[9]  C. Edquist,et al.  Systems of Innovation : Theory and Policy for the Demand Side , 1999 .

[10]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral Systems: Implications for European Innovation Policy , 2004 .

[11]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  A dynamic analytic approach to national innovation systems: The IC industry in Taiwan☆ , 2005 .

[12]  Amnon Frenkel,et al.  Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region , 2001 .

[13]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy , 1999 .

[14]  R. Smits,et al.  The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy , 2004 .

[15]  J. Howells.  Innovation systems and policy in a global economy , 2000 .

[16]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Assessing policies from a systems perspecitve — Experiences with applied innovation systems analysis and implications for policy evaluation , 2006 .

[17]  Leif Hommen,et al.  Comparing national systems of innovation in Asia and Europe: theory and comparative framework , 2008 .

[18]  Stian Nygaard,et al.  System failure, innovation policy and patents : Fuel cells and related hydrogen technology in Norway 1990-2002 , 2006 .

[19]  J. Howells.  Regional Systems of Innovation , 1999 .

[20]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral systems of innovation , 2014 .

[21]  Alan Greenspan.  Globalization and innovation , 2004 .

[22]  B. Lundvall.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy: Technology policy in the learning economy , 1999 .

[23]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of Innovation Approaches - Their Emergence and Characteristics , 2013 .

[24]  Keith Smith.  Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy , 2000 .

[25]  Leif Hommen,et al.  Globalization and Innovation Policy , 2008 .

[26]  Role of University–Industry–Government Linkages in the Innovation Processes of a Small Catching-up Economy , 2008 .

[27]  C. Freeman.  The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[28]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[29]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Technology, globalisation and economic performance , 1997 .

[30]  Keith Smith,et al.  Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process , 2002 .

[31]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues , 2002 .

[32]  N. Tunzelmann,et al.  NETWORK REALIGNMENT AND APPROPRIABILITY IN THE CEE FOOD INDUSTRY , 2002 .

[33]  V. Gilsing,et al.  A system failure framework for innovation policy design , 2005 .

[34]  U. Varblane,et al.  Can the National Innovation Systems of the New EU Member States Be Improved? , 2007 .

[35]  G. Dosi.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy: Some notes on national systems of innovation and production, and their implications for economic analysis , 1999 .

[36]  P. Högselius.  National Systems of Innovation and Creative Destruction : A Small Country Perspective , 2006 .

[37]  S. Radosevic.  National Systems of Innovation and Entrepreneurship: In Search of a Missing Link , 2007 .

[38]  C. Edquist,et al.  Small Country Innovation Systems: Globalization, Change and Policy in Asia and Europe , 2009 .

[39]  A. Isaksen,et al.  New Approaches to Innovation Policy: Some Norwegian Examples , 2001 .

[40]  Secondo Rolfo,et al.  Concepts, measures and perspectives on innovation policy , 2006 .