This work presents a differential system which accurately describes the geometry of human locomotor trajectories of humans walking on the ground level, in absence of obstacles. Our approach emphasizes the close relationship between the shape of the locomotor paths in goal-directed movements and the simplified kinematic model of a wheeled mobile robot. This kind of system has been extensively studied in robotics community. From a kinematic perspective, the characteristic of this wheeled robot is the nonholonomic constraint of the wheels on the floor, which forces the vehicle to move tangentially to its main axis. Humans do not walk sideways. This obvious observation indicates that some constraints (mechanical, anatomical...) act on human bodies restricting the way humans generate locomotor trajectories. To model this, we propose a differential system that respects nonholonomic constraints. We validate this model by comparing simulated trajectories with actual (recorded) trajectories produced during goal-oriented locomotion in humans. Subjects had to start from a pre-defined position and direction to cross over a distant porch (position and orientation of the porch were the two manipulated factors). Such comparative analysis is undertaken by making use of numerical methods to compute the control inputs from actual trajectories. Three body frames have been considered: head, pelvis and trunk. It appears that the trunk can be considered as a kind of a steering wheel that steers the human body with a delay of around 0.2 second. This model has been validated on a database of 1,560 trajectories recorded from seven subjects. It opens a promising route to better understand the human locomotion via differential geometry tools successfully experienced in mobile robotics
[1]
A. Berthoz,et al.
Multisensory integration in spatial orientation
,
1999,
Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[2]
A. Berthoz,et al.
Differential effects of labyrinthine dysfunction on distance and direction during blindfolded walking of a triangular path
,
2002,
Experimental Brain Research.
[3]
Jean-Paul Laumond,et al.
Guidelines in nonholonomic motion planning for mobile robots
,
1998
.
[4]
A. Berthoz,et al.
Relationship between velocity and curvature of a human locomotor trajectory
,
2001,
Neuroscience Letters.
[5]
Shuuji Kajita,et al.
The Human-Size Humanoid Robot That Can Walk, Lie Down and Get Up
,
2003,
ISRR.
[6]
T. Flash,et al.
Velocity and curvature in human locomotion along complex curved paths: a comparison with hand movements
,
2005,
Experimental Brain Research.
[7]
Marc H. Raibert,et al.
Legged Robots That Balance
,
1986,
IEEE Expert.
[8]
J. Canny,et al.
Nonholonomic Motion Planning
,
1992
.
[9]
Sussmann.
Nonlinear Controllability and Optimal Control
,
1990
.
[10]
Alain Berthoz,et al.
Head direc-tion control during active locomotion in humans
,
2005
.
[11]
Franck Multon,et al.
Computer Animation of Human Walking: a Survey
,
1999
.