Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli.

CONTEXT Accurately assessing sexual preference is important in the treatment of child sex offenders. Phallometry is the standard method to identify sexual preference; however, this measure has been criticized for its intrusiveness and limited reliability. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether spatial response pattern to sexual stimuli as revealed by a change in the blood oxygen level-dependent signal facilitates the identification of pedophiles. DESIGN During functional magnetic resonance imaging, pedophilic and nonpedophilic participants were briefly exposed to same- and opposite-sex images of nude children and adults. We calculated differences in blood oxygen level-dependent signals to child and adult sexual stimuli for each participant. The corresponding contrast images were entered into a group analysis to calculate whole-brain difference maps between groups. We calculated an expression value that corresponded to the group result for each participant. These expression values were submitted to 2 different classification algorithms: Fisher linear discriminant analysis and κ -nearest neighbor analysis. This classification procedure was cross-validated using the leave-one-out method. SETTING Section of Sexual Medicine, Medical School, Christian Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. PARTICIPANTS We recruited 24 participants with pedophilia who were sexually attracted to either prepubescent girls (n = 11) or prepubescent boys (n = 13) and 32 healthy male controls who were sexually attracted to either adult women (n = 18) or adult men (n = 14). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity and specificity scores of the 2 classification algorithms. RESULTS The highest classification accuracy was achieved by Fisher linear discriminant analysis, which showed a mean accuracy of 95% (100% specificity, 88% sensitivity). CONCLUSIONS Functional brain response patterns to sexual stimuli contain sufficient information to identify pedophiles with high accuracy. The automatic classification of these patterns is a promising objective tool to clinically diagnose pedophilia.

[1]  Franz Petermann,et al.  Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene (WIE). , 2007 .

[2]  Janet B W Williams Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[3]  P. Lang International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings , 1995 .

[4]  Belur V. Dasarathy,et al.  Nearest neighbor (NN) norms: NN pattern classification techniques , 1991 .

[5]  W. Marshall,et al.  Brief Research Report: The Reliability of the Rape Index in a Sample of Rapists and Nonrapists , 1989, Violence and Victims.

[6]  B. Schiffer,et al.  Executive dysfunctions in pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[7]  B. Bogerts,et al.  Brain pathology in pedophilic offenders: evidence of volume reduction in the right amygdala and related diencephalic structures. , 2007, Archives of general psychiatry.

[8]  N. Martin,et al.  Measurement Models for Sexual Orientation in a Community Twin Sample , 2000, Behavior genetics.

[9]  K. Beier,et al.  Encouraging self-identified pedophiles and hebephiles to seek professional help: first results of the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). , 2009, Child abuse & neglect.

[10]  S. Stoléru,et al.  Brain Functional Imaging Studies Of Sexual Desire & Arousal In Human Males , 2003 .

[11]  M. Seto,et al.  Predictors of Child Pornography Offenses and Child Sexual Abuse in a Community Sample of Pedophiles and Hebephiles , 2011, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[12]  R. Blanchard,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. , 2001, Psychological assessment.

[13]  Thomas Paul,et al.  Functional brain correlates of heterosexual paedophilia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Christian Gaser,et al.  Identifying patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder using whole-brain anatomy , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  B. Christensen,et al.  Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[17]  H. Möller,et al.  Use of neuroanatomical pattern classification to identify subjects in at-risk mental states of psychosis and predict disease transition. , 2009, Archives of general psychiatry.

[18]  S. Smallbone,et al.  Childhood Attachment, Childhood Sexual Abuse, and Onset of Masturbation Among Adult Sexual Offenders , 2003, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[19]  K. Freund,et al.  Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of a phallometric test: An update of phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. , 1991 .

[20]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Abnormal amygdala activation profile in pedophilia , 2008, European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience.

[21]  H. Mehdorn,et al.  Assessment of sexual orientation using the hemodynamic brain response to visual sexual stimuli. , 2009, The journal of sexual medicine.

[22]  V. Quinsey,et al.  The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. , 2005, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[23]  Jonas K. Olofsson,et al.  Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[24]  R. Blanchard,et al.  A Comparison of Volume and Circumference Phallometry: Response Magnitude and Method Agreement , 1999, Archives of sexual behavior.

[25]  M. Brammer,et al.  Pattern Classification of Sad Facial Processing: Toward the Development of Neurobiological Markers in Depression , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  R. Blanchard,et al.  Fraternal Birth Order and Sexual Orientation in Pedophiles , 2000, Archives of sexual behavior.

[27]  M. Seto,et al.  Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: a meta-analysis. , 2009, Child abuse & neglect.

[28]  Blake A. Richards,et al.  Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men. , 2008, Journal of psychiatric research.

[29]  A Survey of Plethysmographic Assessment in North America , 1995 .

[30]  R. Blanchard,et al.  Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. , 1989, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[31]  R. Blanchard,et al.  Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sildenafil in phallometric testing. , 2010, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[32]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  MRI-Based Automated Computer Classification of Probable AD Versus Normal Controls , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  M. Forsting,et al.  Structural brain abnormalities in the frontostriatal system and cerebellum in pedophilia. , 2007, Journal of psychiatric research.

[34]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  A functional endophenotype for sexual orientation in humans , 2006, NeuroImage.

[35]  Michael Forsting,et al.  Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles. , 2008, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN.

[36]  Robert Dickey,et al.  Self-Reported Head Injuries Before and After Age 13 in Pedophilic and Nonpedophilic Men Referred for Clinical Assessment , 2003, Archives of sexual behavior.

[37]  Martin Walter,et al.  Pedophilia is Linked to Reduced Activation in Hypothalamus and Lateral Prefrontal Cortex During Visual Erotic Stimulation , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .