Severity of morphological lesion complexity affects fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenosis.

BACKGROUND Although functional ischemia identification is important when determining revascularization, angiographic assessment alone is challenging in intermediate coronary stenosis. Previous studies have reported that lesion-specific characteristics affected the fractional flow reserve (FFR). However, the relationship between morphological lesion complexity and FFR has not yet been fully evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of morphological lesion complexity on FFR in intermediate coronary stenosis. METHODS A total of 109 consecutive patients with 136 intermediate coronary stenoses (visually estimated diameter stenosis: 40-70%) were assessed via quantitative coronary angiography, lesion-specific characteristics, and FFR. Indexed lesions were assessed according to 6 morphological lesion characteristics: eccentricity, bend, irregularity, calcification, bifurcation, and diffuse. The lesions were then classified into 3 groups according to the morphological severity count represented by the number of present characteristics (mild-complex: 0-1, moderate-complex: 2-3, and severe-complex: 4-6), and their functional severities were evaluated. Lesions with an FFR <0.80 were considered functionally significant coronary stenoses. RESULTS Of the 136 lesions, 51% were located in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and 47% had an FFR <0.80. The FFR differed significantly among the 3 lesion complexity groups (0.84±0.10 vs. 0.79±0.10 vs. 0.73±0.07, for mild-, moderate-, and severe-complex, respectively; p<0.01). In a multivariate logistic analysis, LAD lesions, moderate- and severe-complex, and diameter stenosis were independently associated with an FFR <0.80 [odds ratio (OR): 5.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.50-12.80, p<0.01; OR: 2.96, 95% CI: 1.30-6.72, p<0.01; OR: 7.11, 95% CI: 1.25-40.37, p=0.03, and OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.04-6.72, p=0.04, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS Both indexed vessels and the degree of diameter stenosis affected the FFR. In addition, the severity of morphological lesion complexity correlated with the degree of functional severity in intermediate coronary stenosis.

[1]  R. Lopez-Palop,et al.  Effect of lesion length on functional significance of intermediate long coronary lesions , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  N. Pijls,et al.  Fractional flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization. , 2013, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[3]  Guido Germano,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.

[4]  Satoshi Nishimura,et al.  Impact of Lesion Length on Functional Significance in Intermediate Coronary Lesions , 2013, Clinical cardiology.

[5]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Impact of myocardial supply area on the transstenotic hemodynamics as determined by fractional flow reserve , 2014, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[6]  Hae-Young Lee,et al.  Clinical and physiological outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with serial stenoses within one coronary artery. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[9]  T. Ryan Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Francesco Burzotta,et al.  Influence of the Amount of Myocardium Subtended by a Stenosis on Fractional Flow Reserve , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyFractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study , 2010 .

[12]  D. Berman,et al.  Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. Torguson,et al.  FIRST: Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Relationship Study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  L. Shaw,et al.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[15]  Habib Samady,et al.  Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[17]  A Bol,et al.  Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. , 1994, Circulation.

[18]  E. Topol,et al.  Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. , 1995, Circulation.

[19]  B. Lewis,et al.  A Poiseuille-based coronary angiographic index for prediction of fractional flow reserve. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[20]  N. Tanaka Relationship between anatomical and functional assessments of coronary artery stenosis. , 2012, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[21]  A. Schoenenberger,et al.  Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[22]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  William Wijns,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  N. Pijls,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve , 1995 .

[25]  Eun Bo Shim,et al.  Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[26]  A. Iskandrian,et al.  Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  F. Loop,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Circulation.

[28]  G. Beller,et al.  Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  William Wijns,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Angioplasty in Moderate Coronary Stenosis: A Randomized Trial , 2001, Circulation.

[30]  J. Saw,et al.  Development and validation of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) angiographic scoring tool (FAST) to improve the angiographic grading and selection of intermediate lesions that require FFR assessment , 2012, Coronary artery disease.

[31]  R. Redberg,et al.  The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.