Evaluation of a prototype trilayer membrane (PTLM) for lateral ridge augmentation: an experimental study in the canine mandible.

The objective of this animal study was to evaluate a biodegradable/bioresorbable prototype trilayer membrane (PTLM) consisting of two collagen layers and an internal polylactide layer for lateral ridge augmentation in conjunction with two different bone grafting materials: particulate autograft or deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). In four mongrel dogs, two lateral bone defects per side were created in the mandible. The four defects per dog were randomly subjected to the following grafting treatments 3 months later: 1. PTLM+DBBM, 2. PTLM+particulate autograft, 3. ePTFE membrane+DBBM, 4. ePTFE membrane+particulate autograft. After a healing period of 4 1/2 months, the dogs were sacrificed for histological and histomorphometrical analysis. Percentage calculations for areas showing bone regeneration within the former defect outline were 56.8% for PTLM+DBBM, 85.2% for PTLM+autograft, 52.3% for ePTFE+DBBM, and 96.9% for ePTFE+autograft (differences between autograft and DBBM sites were significant at P<0.01 to P<0.05). Measurements of ridge enlargement (horizontal bone gain) were also significantly better for autograft+ePTFE sites compared to the other three grafting treatments. Histology demonstrated for most PTLM sites a moderate infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells adjacent to empty spaces corresponding to polylactide fragments. In addition, these reactions appeared to provoke subsequent resorption of newly formed bone. No such findings were seen in ePTFE sites. The tested prototype membrane cannot be recommended for clinical application.

[1]  H. Tesluk,et al.  Reconstruction of Calvarial Defects with Anorganic Bovine Bone Mineral (Bio‐Oss) in a Rabbit Model , 1993, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[2]  D Buser,et al.  Evaluation of filling materials in membrane--protected bone defects. A comparative histomorphometric study in the mandible of miniature pigs. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Evaluation of a new bioresorbable barrier to facilitate guided bone regeneration around exposed implant threads. An experimental study in the monkey. , 1998, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  I. Jackson,et al.  Comparison of Inorganic Bovine Bone Mineral Particles with Porous Hydroxyapatite Granules and Cranial Bone Dust in the Reconstruction of Full‐thickness Skull Defect , 1992, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[5]  M. Taylor,et al.  Residual lateral wall defects following sinus grafting with recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 or Bio-Oss in the chimpanzee. , 1998, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[6]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  A tissue engineered cell-occlusive device for hard tissue regeneration--a preliminary report. , 2001, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[7]  G. Dickson Methods of Calcified Tissue Preparation , 1984 .

[8]  H. Salama,et al.  Alveolar ridge preservation and reconstruction. , 1996, Periodontology 2000.

[9]  R. Caffesse,et al.  Bone apposition onto oral implants in the sinus area filled with different grafting materials. A histological study in beagle dogs. , 1995, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  D. Buser,et al.  Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible. , 1994, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  E. Barboza,et al.  A new approach to regeneration of surgically reduced alveolar ridges in dogs: a clinical and histologic study. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  M. Dard,et al.  Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants using a resorbable membrane vs a PTFE membrane. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[13]  S Nyman,et al.  Localized ridge augmentation in dogs: a pilot study using membranes and hydroxyapatite. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss. An experimental study in the dog. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  Daniel Buser,et al.  Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry , 1994 .

[16]  H. Haanaes,et al.  Alveolar ridge augmentation in rats by Bio-Oss. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[17]  R. Schenk,et al.  Supracrestal bone formation around dental implants: an experimental dog study. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  A. Skoglund,et al.  A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[19]  P. Sandstedt,et al.  A comparative study of anorganic xenogenic bone and autogenous bone implants for bone regeneration in rabbits. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  C. Hammerle,et al.  The combined use of bioresorbable membranes and xenografts or autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants. A study in beagle dogs. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  S. Lynch,et al.  Comparison of porous bone mineral and biologically active glass in critical-sized defects. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[22]  M. Taylor,et al.  Maxillary sinus augmentation in the non-human primate: a comparative radiographic and histologic study between recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 and natural bone mineral. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  D Buser,et al.  Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla. , 1993, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[24]  A. Gritli-Linde,et al.  Healing of mandibular defects with different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes: an experimental study in rats. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[25]  D Buser,et al.  Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes: a clinical study with 40 partially edentulous patients. , 1996, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[26]  H. Schliephake,et al.  A review of material properties of biodegradable and bioresorbable polymers and devices for GTR and GBR applications. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[27]  P. Alberius,et al.  Osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral and synthetic hydroxylapatite ceramic in the repair of experimental skull bone defects. , 1992, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[28]  D Buser,et al.  Localized ridge augmentation with autografts and barrier membranes. , 1999, Periodontology 2000.

[29]  J. Strub,et al.  Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part IV. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated implants. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  L. Sennerby,et al.  Guided jaw-bone regeneration using an experimental rabbit model. , 1998, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[31]  D. Cochran,et al.  Lateral ridge augmentation using different bone fillers and barrier membrane application. A histologic and histomorphometric pilot study in the canine mandible. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[32]  R. Schenk,et al.  Effect of different microstructures of e-PTFE membranes on bone regeneration and soft tissue response: a histologic study in canine mandible. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[33]  J. Madsen,et al.  Histological evaluation of different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes implanted subcutaneously in rats. , 2000, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[34]  R. Yukna,et al.  Collagen Membrane Resorption in Dogs: A Comparative Study , 2001, Implant dentistry.

[35]  P Schärer,et al.  Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[36]  N. Lang,et al.  The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[37]  M. Hürzeler,et al.  Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier. An experimental study in the monkey. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[38]  F. Melsen,et al.  Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.