Connectivity-Informed fMRI Activation Detection

A growing interest has emerged in studying the correlation structure of spontaneous and task-induced brain activity to elucidate the functional architecture of the brain. In particular, functional networks estimated from resting state (RS) data were shown to exhibit high resemblance to those evoked by stimuli. Motivated by these findings, we propose a novel generative model that integrates RS-connectivity and stimulus-evoked responses under a unified analytical framework. Our model permits exact closed-form solutions for both the posterior activation effect estimates and the model evidence. To learn RS networks, graphical LASSO and the oracle approximating shrinkage technique are deployed. On a cohort of 65 subjects, we demonstrate increased sensitivity in fMRI activation detection using our connectivity-informed model over the standard univariate approach. Our results thus provide further evidence for the presence of an intrinsic relationship between brain activity during rest and task, the exploitation of which enables higher detection power in task-driven studies.

[1]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2010, 13th International Conference, Beijing, China, September 20-24, 2010, Proceedings, Part III , 2010, MICCAI.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[3]  M. Greicius,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Xavier Descombes,et al.  Spatio-temporal fMRI analysis using Markov random fields , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Detecting Brain Activation in fMRI Using Group Random Walker , 2010, MICCAI.

[6]  B. Thirion,et al.  Fast reproducible identification and large-scale databasing of individual functional cognitive networks , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[8]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[9]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Joost N. Kok Machine Learning: ECML 2007, 18th European Conference on Machine Learning, Warsaw, Poland, September 17-21, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, ECML.

[11]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Fully Bayesian spatio-temporal modeling of FMRI data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  M. Fox,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[13]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Shrinkage Algorithms for MMSE Covariance Estimation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Mark W. Schmidt,et al.  Fast Optimization Methods for L1 Regularization: A Comparative Study and Two New Approaches , 2007, ECML.

[16]  John C Gore,et al.  Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Random Walker Based Estimation and Spatial Analysis of Probabilistic fMRI Activation Maps , 2009, MICCAI 2009.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Diffusion-based spatial priors for imaging , 2007, NeuroImage.

[19]  Gm Gero Walter,et al.  Bayesian linear regression , 2009 .

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian fMRI time series analysis with spatial priors , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: Multi‐subject parcellation of fMRI datasets , 2006, Human brain mapping.