The Colorectal Cancer Screening Process in Community Settings: A Conceptual Model for the Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens Consortium

Reducing colorectal cancer mortality by promoting screening has been a national goal for two decades. The NCI's Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) consortium is the first federal initiative to foster coordinated, transdisciplinary research evaluating the entire cancer screening process in community settings. PROSPR is creating a central data repository to facilitate research evaluating the breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening process across different patient populations, provider types, and delivery systems. Data are being collected and organized at the multiple levels in which individuals are nested (e.g., healthcare systems, facilities, providers, and patients). Here, we describe a conceptual model of the colorectal cancer screening process guiding data collection and highlight critical research questions that will be addressed through pooled data. We also describe the three research centers focused on colorectal cancer screening with respect to study populations, practice settings, and screening policies. PROSPR comprehensively elucidates the complex screening process through observational study, and has potential to improve care delivery beyond the healthcare systems studied. Findings will inform intervention designs and policies to optimize colorectal cancer screening delivery and advance the Institute of Medicine's goals of effective, efficient, coordinated, timely, and safe health care with respect to evidence-based cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(7); 1147–58. ©2014 AACR.

[1]  T. Levin,et al.  Organized colorectal cancer screening in integrated health care systems. , 2011, Epidemiologic reviews.

[2]  S. Taplin,et al.  Multilevel factors affecting quality: examples from the cancer care continuum. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[3]  S. Taplin,et al.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[4]  S. Hendren,et al.  Eliminating Disparities in Cancer Screening and Follow-up of Abnormal Results: What Will It Take? , 2011, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[5]  Jasmin A. Tiro,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013, JAMA Internal Medicine.

[6]  P. Austin An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.

[7]  J. Newhouse,et al.  Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables. , 1998, Annual review of public health.

[8]  Wiebe R. Pestman,et al.  Instrumental Variables: Application and Limitations , 2006, Epidemiology.

[9]  M. McIntosh Instrumental variables when evaluating screening trials: estimating the benefit of detecting cancer by screening. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  J. Hornaday,et al.  Cancer Facts & Figures 2004 , 2004 .

[11]  Lawrence Joseph,et al.  Developing model-based algorithms to identify screening colonoscopies using administrative health databases , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[12]  M. Manos,et al.  Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up? , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology * † , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  Amy B. Knudsen,et al.  Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Carmen L. Lewis,et al.  Organizational Change: A Way to Increase Colon, Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practices , 2011, Journal of Community Health.

[16]  Robert H. Fletcher,et al.  Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice: Innovative Strategies and Future Directions , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[17]  L. Seeff,et al.  Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Test Use, Including CT Colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey , 2012, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[18]  N. Weiss,et al.  Application of the case-control method in the evaluation of screening. , 1994, Epidemiologic reviews.

[19]  B. Polite,et al.  Interventions to Improve Care Related to Colorectal Cancer Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[20]  Mitchell H Katz,et al.  Transforming a traditional safety net into a coordinated care system: lessons from healthy San Francisco. , 2011, Health affairs.

[21]  G. Petersen,et al.  Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: a systematic review. , 2006, JAMA.

[22]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Changes in risk factors and increases in screening contribute to the decline in colorectal cancer mortality, 1975 to 2000. , 2010, Gastroenterology.

[24]  D. Urbach,et al.  Methodological approaches to population based research of screening procedures in the presence of selection bias and exposure measurement error: colonoscopy and colorectal cancer outcomes in Ontario , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[25]  S. Taplin,et al.  Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[26]  N. Weiss Analysis of case-control studies of the efficacy of screening for cancer: How should we deal with tests done in persons with symptoms? , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[27]  A. Zauber,et al.  Simulation of colorectal cancer screening: what we do and do not know and does it matter. , 2010, Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology.

[28]  S. Taplin,et al.  Introduction: Understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[29]  Ron J. Anderson,et al.  Community-oriented primary care in action: a Dallas story. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[30]  A. Jemal,et al.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975‐2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates , 2010, Cancer.

[31]  S. Vernon,et al.  An Automated Intervention With Stepped Increases in Support to Increase Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[33]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Introducing Multilevel Modeling , 1998 .

[34]  J. Stoker,et al.  The Department of Health and Human Services. , 1999, Home healthcare nurse.

[35]  M. Manos,et al.  A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[36]  T. Church Screening for colorectal cancer--which strategy is the best? , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[37]  C. Klabunde,et al.  Physicians' Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussion and Recommendation Patterns , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[38]  S. Taplin,et al.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[39]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[40]  C. Klabunde,et al.  Trends in Colorectal Cancer Test Use among Vulnerable Populations in the United States , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[41]  Ron J. Anderson,et al.  The quest for quality: perspectives from the safety net. , 2007, Frontiers of health services management.

[42]  A. Bitton,et al.  Comparing patient and endoscopist perceptions of the colonoscopy indication. , 2010, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[43]  Karen Glanz,et al.  Implementation and spread of interventions into the multilevel context of routine practice and policy: implications for the cancer care continuum. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[44]  D. Jonas,et al.  Systematic Review: Enhancing the Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[45]  M. Manos,et al.  Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[46]  Donald Steinwachs,et al.  National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[47]  Cynthia J. Coffman,et al.  Ascertainment of Colonoscopy Indication Using Administrative Data , 2010, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[48]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology. , 2008, Radiology.

[49]  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[50]  L. Nekhlyudov,et al.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[51]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Cancer research network: using integrated healthcare delivery systems as platforms for cancer survivorship research , 2013, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[52]  J. Zapka,et al.  Innovative provider- and health system-directed approaches to improving colorectal cancer screening delivery. , 2008, Medical care.

[53]  H. Brenner,et al.  A Simulation Model for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Potential of Stool Tests with Various Performance Characteristics Compared with Screening Colonoscopy , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[54]  S. Taplin,et al.  Interfaces across the cancer continuum offer opportunities to improve the process of care. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[55]  P. Maisonneuve,et al.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[56]  H. Brenner,et al.  New stool tests for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review focusing on performance characteristics and practicalness , 2005, International journal of cancer.