Protein-protein interaction networks: from interactions to networks.

The goal of interaction proteomics that studies the protein-protein interactions of all expressed proteins is to understand biological processes that are strictly regulated by these interactions. The availability of entire genome sequences of many organisms and high-throughput analysis tools has led scientists to study the entire proteome (Pandey and Mann, 2000). There are various high-throughput methods for detecting protein interactions such as yeast two-hybrid approach and mass spectrometry to produce vast amounts of data that can be utilized to decipher protein functions in complicated biological networks. In this review, we discuss recent developments in analytical methods for large-scale protein interactions and the future direction of interaction proteomics.

[1]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. , 2000, Science.

[2]  B. Séraphin,et al.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  M J Dunn,et al.  Positional reproducibility of protein spots in two‐dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using immobilised pH gradient isoelectric focusing in the first dimension: An interlaboratory comparison , 1994, Electrophoresis.

[4]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[5]  J R Yates,et al.  A novel multiple affinity purification tag and its use in identification of proteins associated with a cyclin-CDK complex. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Leslie M Loew,et al.  Computational cell biology: spatiotemporal simulation of cellular events. , 2002, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[7]  S. Fields,et al.  Protein-peptide interactions analyzed with the yeast two-hybrid system. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function , 1999, Nature.

[9]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[10]  E. Golemis,et al.  The continued evolution of two-hybrid screening approaches in yeast: how to outwit different preys with different baits. , 2000, Gene.

[11]  S. Fields,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of vaccinia virus protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Quadroni,et al.  Proteomics and automation , 2007, Electrophoresis.

[13]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  Using the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) for analysis of protein similarities and structure , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  I. Stagljar,et al.  A genetic system based on split-ubiquitin for the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins in vivo. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Vidal,et al.  Combined Functional Genomic Maps of the C. elegans DNA Damage Response , 2002, Science.

[16]  M. Vidal,et al.  Reverse two-hybrid and one-hybrid systems to detect dissociation of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants , 2001, Science.

[18]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events , 1999, Nature.

[19]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  DIP: the Database of Interacting Proteins , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  M. Mann,et al.  Proteomics to study genes and genomes , 2000, Nature.

[21]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[22]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. , 2002, Genome research.

[23]  Leslie M Loew,et al.  The Virtual Cell project. , 2002, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[24]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[25]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. , 2002, Science.

[26]  M. Vidal,et al.  Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. , 2000, Science.

[27]  H. Shih,et al.  A positive genetic selection for disrupting protein-protein interactions: identification of CREB mutations that prevent association with the coactivator CBP. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  H. Herzel,et al.  Is there a bias in proteome research? , 2001, Genome research.

[30]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. , 1999, Science.

[31]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Warren C. Lathe,et al.  Predicting protein function by genomic context: quantitative evaluation and qualitative inferences. , 2000, Genome research.

[33]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[34]  P. Bork,et al.  Measuring genome evolution. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Gary D Bader,et al.  BIND--The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  A. Miyawaki Visualization of the spatial and temporal dynamics of intracellular signaling. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[37]  M. Vidal,et al.  Genetic characterization of a mammalian protein-protein interaction domain by using a yeast reverse two-hybrid system. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Vincent Schächter,et al.  erratum: The protein–protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori , 2001, Nature.

[39]  B. Snel,et al.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.

[40]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The I (cid:1) B –NF-(cid:1) B Signaling Module: Temporal Control and Selective Gene Activation , 2022 .

[41]  C. Watanabe,et al.  Identifying proteins from two-dimensional gels by molecular mass searching of peptide fragments in protein sequence databases. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Global Analysis of Protein Activities Using Proteome Chips , 2001, Science.

[43]  Jennifer M. Campbell,et al.  The characteristics of peptide collision-induced dissociation using a high-performance MALDI-TOF/TOF tandem mass spectrometer. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[44]  Ammasi Periasamy,et al.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy imaging of live cell protein localizations , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  L. Loew,et al.  The Virtual Cell: a software environment for computational cell biology. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[46]  A. Keating,et al.  Comprehensive Identification of Human bZIP Interactions with Coiled-Coil Arrays , 2003, Science.

[47]  C. Deane,et al.  Protein Interactions , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[48]  B. Snel,et al.  Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.