Effects of inducer intake kinetics on the dynamics of gene expression

Many genes are only active following the intake of an inducer by the cell, via passive diffusive, positive, or negative feedback intake mechanisms. Based on measurements of the in vivo kinetics of intake and subsequent transcription events in Escherichia coli, we use stochastic models to investigate how the kinetics of intake affects both transient and nearequilibrium dynamics of gene expression. We find that the intake kinetics affects mean and variability of the transient time to reach the steady state of proteins numbers and also the degree of fluctuations in these numbers. Fluctuations in the extracellular number of inducers affects the variability of protein numbers at steady state in a degree that differs with the intake kinetics. Finally, changing the intake kinetics of an inducer of a genetic switch allows tuning the bias in the choice of noisy attractor. We conclude that the kinetics of inducer intake affects transient and near-equilibrium gene expression dynamics and, consequently, the phenotypic diversity of organisms in fluctuating environments.

[1]  J. Monod,et al.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. , 1961, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[2]  M. Thomas Record,et al.  RNA Polymerase-Promoter Interactions: the Comings and Goings of RNA Polymerase , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  Olli Yli-Harja,et al.  In vivo single-molecule kinetics of activation and subsequent activity of the arabinose promoter , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  A. Ishihama,et al.  Transcriptional Response of Escherichia coli to External Zinc , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  Antti Häkkinen,et al.  In vivo kinetics of transcription initiation of the lar promoter in Escherichia coli. Evidence for a sequential mechanism with two rate-limiting steps , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[6]  Tianhai Tian,et al.  Oscillatory Regulation of Hes1: Discrete Stochastic Delay Modelling and Simulation , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  J. Barbé,et al.  A multifunctional gene (tetR) controls Tn10-encoded tetracycline resistance , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  W. McClure,et al.  Kinetics of open complex formation between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the lac UV5 promoter. Evidence for a sequential mechanism involving three steps. , 1985, Biochemistry.

[9]  J. Elf,et al.  Probing Transcription Factor Dynamics at the Single-Molecule Level in a Living Cell , 2007, Science.

[10]  J. Šajbidor,et al.  Effect of some environmental factors on the content and composition of microbial membrane lipids. , 1997, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[11]  X. Xie,et al.  Probing Gene Expression in Live Cells, One Protein Molecule at a Time , 2006, Science.

[12]  C. Brown,et al.  A Second Transport System for l-Arabinose in Escherichia coli B/r Controlled by the araC Gene , 1972, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  Rui Zhu,et al.  A General Modeling Strategy for Gene Regulatory Networks with Stochastic Dynamics , 2006, J. Comput. Biol..

[14]  K. Kailasapathy,et al.  Metabolic and biochemical responses of probiotic bacteria to oxygen. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  H. Bujard,et al.  Dissecting the functional program of Escherichia coli promoters: the combined mode of action of Lac repressor and AraC activator. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[17]  Andre S Ribeiro,et al.  Dynamics and evolution of stochastic bistable gene networks with sensing in fluctuating environments. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Andre S Ribeiro,et al.  Studying genetic regulatory networks at the molecular level: delayed reaction stochastic models. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Rui Zhu,et al.  Validation of an algorithm for delay stochastic simulation of transcription and translation in prokaryotic gene expression , 2006, Physical biology.

[20]  Søren J. Sørensen,et al.  The Effect of the lacY Gene on the Induction of IPTG Inducible Promoters, Studied in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas fluorescens , 1998, Current Microbiology.

[21]  C. A. Thomas,et al.  Visualization of Bacterial Genes in Action , 1970, Science.

[22]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[23]  D. Volfson,et al.  Delay-induced stochastic oscillations in gene regulation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Andre S. Ribeiro,et al.  SGN Sim, a Stochastic Genetic Networks Simulator , 2007, Bioinform..

[25]  A. Ribeiro Stochastic and delayed stochastic models of gene expression and regulation. , 2010, Mathematical biosciences.

[26]  Paul J. Choi,et al.  Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2010, Science.

[27]  W. Hillen,et al.  Tetracyclines: antibiotic action, uptake, and resistance mechanisms , 1996, Archives of Microbiology.

[28]  J. Ross,et al.  Signal Processing by Simple Chemical Systems , 2002 .

[29]  R. G. Allen,et al.  Oxidative stress and gene regulation. , 2000, Free radical biology & medicine.

[30]  Kirsten Jung,et al.  Timing and dynamics of single cell gene expression in the arabinose utilization system. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Arkady B. Khodursky,et al.  Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Noisy attractors and ergodic sets in models of gene regulatory networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.