Brachyury and SMAD signalling collaboratively orchestrate distinct mesoderm and endoderm gene regulatory networks in differentiating human embryonic stem cells

The transcription factor brachyury (T, BRA) is one of the first markers of gastrulation and lineage specification in vertebrates. Despite its wide use and importance in stem cell and developmental biology, its functional genomic targets in human cells are largely unknown. Here, we use differentiating human embryonic stem cells to study the role of BRA in activin A-induced endoderm and BMP4-induced mesoderm progenitors. We show that BRA has distinct genome-wide binding landscapes in these two cell populations, and that BRA interacts and collaborates with SMAD1 or SMAD2/3 signalling to regulate the expression of its target genes in a cell-specific manner. Importantly, by manipulating the levels of BRA in cells exposed to different signalling environments, we demonstrate that BRA is essential for mesoderm but not for endoderm formation. Together, our data illuminate the function of BRA in the context of human embryonic development and show that the regulatory role of BRA is context dependent. Our study reinforces the importance of analysing the functions of a transcription factor in different cellular and signalling environments. Summary: In differentiating hESCs, BRACHYURY has cell type-specific targets and functions: it acts with SMAD1 to promote mesoderm specification, while in the endoderm it interacts with SMAD2/3.

[1]  E. Stanley,et al.  Brachyury and Related Tbx Proteins Interact with the Mixl1 Homeodomain Protein and Negatively Regulate Mixl1 Transcriptional Activity , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  H. Urushihara,et al.  Effects of the brachyury (T) mutation on morphogenetic movement in the mouse embryo. , 1981, Developmental biology.

[3]  D. Loebel,et al.  Gene function in mouse embryogenesis: get set for gastrulation , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  P. Tam,et al.  Regionalisation of cell fate and morphogenetic movement of the mesoderm during mouse gastrulation. , 1995, Developmental genetics.

[5]  I. Burtscher,et al.  Foxa2 regulates polarity and epithelialization in the endoderm germ layer of the mouse embryo , 2009, Development.

[6]  P. Tam,et al.  Gene expression pattern and progression of embryogenesis in the immediate post-implantation period of mouse development. , 2007, Gene expression patterns : GEP.

[7]  Robert Tjian,et al.  Charting Brachyury-mediated developmental pathways during early mouse embryogenesis , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Transcription factor binding dynamics during human ESC differentiation , 2015, Nature.

[9]  F. Beck,et al.  Expression of Cdx‐2 in the mouse embryo and placenta: Possible role in patterning of the extra‐embryonic membranes , 1995, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[10]  M. Trotter,et al.  Generation of human vascular smooth muscle subtypes provides insight into embryological origin-dependent disease susceptibility , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  T. Down,et al.  Genomic Targets of Brachyury (T) in Differentiating Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Natalia B. Ivanova,et al.  Distinct lineage specification roles for NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 in human embryonic stem cells. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[13]  J. Schlom,et al.  The T-box transcription factor Brachyury promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human tumor cells. , 2010, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[14]  Takeya Kasukawa,et al.  Transcriptomic landscape of the primitive streak , 2010, Development.

[15]  V. Wilson,et al.  Redefining the progression of lineage segregations during mammalian embryogenesis by clonal analysis. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[16]  E. Furlong,et al.  Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  P. Chesley.  Development of the short‐tailed mutant in the house mouse , 1935 .

[18]  R. Pedersen,et al.  Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in adherent and in chemically defined culture conditions. , 2008, Current protocols in stem cell biology.

[19]  Tom H. Pringle,et al.  The human genome browser at UCSC. , 2002, Genome research.

[20]  R. Beddington,et al.  The role of the brachyury gene in heart development and left–right specification in the mouse , 1998, Mechanisms of Development.

[21]  Paul Flicek,et al.  A gene regulatory network directed by zebrafish No tail accounts for its roles in mesoderm formation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  E. Bikoff,et al.  The T-box transcription factor Eomesodermin acts upstream of Mesp1 to specify cardiac mesoderm during mouse gastrulation , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  R. Pedersen,et al.  Biphasic Induction of Pdx1 in Mouse and Human Embryonic Stem Cells Can Mimic Development of Pancreatic β‐Cells , 2009, Stem cells.

[24]  J. Rossant,et al.  HNF-3β is essential for node and notochord formation in mouse development , 1994, Cell.

[25]  K. Struhl,et al.  Chromatin Immunoprecipitation for Determining the Association of Proteins with Specific Genomic Sequences In Vivo , 2004, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[26]  U. Hofmann,et al.  Pivotal roles for eomesodermin during axis formation, epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition and endoderm specification in the mouse , 2008, Development.

[27]  V. Kouskoff,et al.  Haemangioblast commitment is initiated in the primitive streak of the mouse embryo , 2004, Nature.

[28]  Elizabeth J. Robertson,et al.  Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  F. Arvelo,et al.  [Stem cells and cancer]. , 2014, Investigacion clinica.

[30]  Chikara Furusawa,et al.  Characterization of mesendoderm: a diverging point of the definitive endoderm and mesoderm in embryonic stem cell differentiation culture , 2005, Development.

[31]  B. Herrmann,et al.  The Brachyury gene encodes a novel DNA binding protein. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[32]  J. Rossant,et al.  HNF-3 beta is essential for node and notochord formation in mouse development. , 1994, Cell.

[33]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[34]  V. Papaioannou.  The T-box gene family: emerging roles in development, stem cells and cancer , 2014, Development.

[35]  Valerie Wilson,et al.  Stem cells, signals and vertebrate body axis extension , 2009, Development.

[36]  Jennifer L. O'Day.  Statistical Significance for Genome Wide Studies Under Unequal Variance , 2015 .

[37]  Ty C. Voss,et al.  Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[38]  F. Conlon,et al.  T‐box genes in early embryogenesis , 2004, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[39]  M. Trotter,et al.  Pluripotency factors regulate definitive endoderm specification through eomesodermin. , 2011, Genes & development.

[40]  P. Serup,et al.  Isolation and characterization of node/notochord-like cells from mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Stem cells and development.

[41]  B. Lim,et al.  Activin/Nodal Signaling Controls Divergent Transcriptional Networks in Human Embryonic Stem Cells and in Endoderm Progenitors , 2011, Stem cells.

[42]  R. David,et al.  Induction of MesP1 by Brachyury(T) generates the common multipotent cardiovascular stem cell. , 2011, Cardiovascular research.

[43]  Cory Y. McLean,et al.  GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  V. Papaioannou,et al.  Teasing out T-box targets in early mesoderm. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[45]  K. Downs,et al.  Brachyury is required for elongation and vasculogenesis in the murine allantois , 2006, Development.

[46]  Rafael A Irizarry,et al.  Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[47]  J. Baker,et al.  HEB and E2A function as SMAD/FOXH1 cofactors. , 2011, Genes & development.

[48]  K. Shirahige,et al.  A mesodermal factor, T, specifies mouse germ cell fate by directly activating germline determinants. , 2013, Developmental cell.

[49]  Thomas M. Jessell,et al.  The winged-helix transcription factor HNF-3β is required for notochord development in the mouse embryo , 1994, Cell.

[50]  Gordon K. Smyth,et al.  limmaGUI: A graphical user interface for linear modeling of microarray data , 2004, Bioinform..

[51]  M. Biggin.  Animal transcription networks as highly connected, quantitative continua. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[52]  Bart Deplancke,et al.  Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled to detection by quantitative real-time PCR to study transcription factor binding to DNA in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[53]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors Determine Cell-Type-Specific Responses to TGF-β Signaling , 2011, Cell.

[54]  Mikael Bodén,et al.  MEME Suite: tools for motif discovery and searching , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[55]  K. Downs.  Systematic localization of oct‐3/4 to the gastrulating mouse conceptus suggests manifold roles in mammalian development , 2008, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[56]  K. Niakan,et al.  BRACHYURY and CDX2 Mediate BMP-Induced Differentiation of Human and Mouse Pluripotent Stem Cells into Embryonic and Extraembryonic Lineages , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[57]  Roger A. Pedersen,et al.  NANOG and CDX2 pattern distinct subtypes of human mesoderm during exit from pluripotency. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[58]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[59]  D. Huylebroeck,et al.  Smads and chromatin modulation. , 2005, Cytokine & growth factor reviews.

[60]  Michael J. Gilchrist,et al.  In Vivo T-Box Transcription Factor Profiling Reveals Joint Regulation of Embryonic Neuromesodermal Bipotency , 2013, Cell reports.

[61]  R. Pedersen,et al.  Clonal analysis of epiblast fate during germ layer formation in the mouse embryo. , 1991, Development.

[62]  A. Poustka,et al.  Cloning of the T gene required in mesoderm formation in the mouse , 1990, Nature.

[63]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Cdx2 is essential for axial elongation in mouse development. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  Gordon Keller,et al.  Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture , 2004, Development.

[65]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  Expression pattern of the mouse T gene and its role in mesoderm formation , 1990, Nature.

[66]  J. Smith,et al.  Evolution of Brachyury proteins: identification of a novel regulatory domain conserved within Bilateria. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[67]  Bing Lim,et al.  A precarious balance: pluripotency factors as lineage specifiers. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[68]  Michael D. Wilson,et al.  ChIP-seq: using high-throughput sequencing to discover protein-DNA interactions. , 2009, Methods.

[69]  Samy Lamouille,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[70]  A. Durston,et al.  The initiation of Hox gene expression in Xenopus laevis is controlled by Brachyury and BMP-4. , 2004, Developmental biology.

[71]  Gordon Keller,et al.  Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells to Clinically Relevant Populations: Lessons from Embryonic Development , 2008, Cell.

[72]  S. Aparício,et al.  Eomesodermin is required for mouse trophoblast development and mesoderm formation , 2000, Nature.

[73]  D. Kimelman,et al.  Brachyury establishes the embryonic mesodermal progenitor niche. , 2010, Genes & development.

[74]  R. Beddington,et al.  Expression of T protein in the primitive streak is necessary and sufficient for posterior mesoderm movement and somite differentiation. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[75]  Matt Thomson,et al.  Pluripotency Factors in Embryonic Stem Cells Regulate Differentiation into Germ Layers , 2011, Cell.

[76]  S. Marcellini.  When Brachyury meets Smad1: the evolution of bilateral symmetry during gastrulation , 2006, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[77]  P. Serup,et al.  EVEN-SKIPPED HOMEOBOX 1 controls human ES cell differentiation by directly repressing GOOSECOID expression. , 2012, Developmental biology.

[78]  E. Kroon,et al.  Efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to definitive endoderm , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[79]  Paul Flicek,et al.  An integrated functional genomics approach identifies the regulatory network directed by brachyury (T) in chordoma , 2012, The Journal of pathology.

[80]  T. Blundell,et al.  Functional specificity of the Xenopus T-domain protein Brachyury is conferred by its ability to interact with Smad1. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[81]  A. Mccarthy.  Development , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.