Education journals: Two decades of change and implications for the field

The authors sought to systematically examine patterns of change over time, as well as current variations, in educational journal specifications and publishing, including higher education. The 100 journals in this sample included research and practitioner venues across a range of subdomains and specializations. The authors gathered data for 3 points in time, at 10‐year intervals during a 20‐year period, from 1989–2009. They examined the following in detail: journal profiles for publishing characteristics, submission specifications for manuscript parameters, and full‐text published manuscripts for compliance with specifications. All were analyzed as point‐in‐time comparisons as well as trajectories of change over time. Journal profiles demonstrated patterns of increased centralization and digitization, inclusiveness of readership, increased frequency of issues, and increased length of articles. Key findings for manuscript parameter trends included increased specificity of detail, range of manuscript types and research designs accepted, and average manuscript length. In addition, journals have more explicitly specified elements previously left implicit, such as professional and ethical standards. Criteria for submission procedures and manuscript quality are consistent with university faculty performance standards for productivity and technological advancement. Findings carry implications for publishing, journal management, faculty work, and performance evaluation.

[1]  David A Cook,et al.  Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review , 2007, Medical education.

[2]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[3]  Lowell L. Hargens,et al.  Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates. , 1988 .

[4]  Ma. de la Natividad Jiménez Salas,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry , 1967 .

[5]  Nathaniel J. Bray,et al.  Status of Journals in the Field of Higher Education , 2011 .

[6]  G. Thomas,et al.  Quality in research and the significance of community assessment and peer review: education’s idiosyncrasy , 2007 .

[7]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  A. Bedeian Balancing Authorial Voice and Editorial Omniscience: The “It’s My Paper and I’ll Say What I Want To” versus “Ghostwriters in the Sky” Minuet , 2008 .

[9]  Annette Lareau,et al.  Education Research On Trial : Policy Reform and the Call for Scientific Rigor , 2009 .

[10]  Alan E. Bayer,et al.  Multi-Method Strategies for Defining “Core” Higher Education Journals , 2017 .

[11]  M. Callaham,et al.  Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction. , 2002, JAMA.

[12]  D. Berliner Comment: Educational Research:The Hardest Science of All , 2002 .

[13]  B. Green,et al.  Trends in articles published over the past 20 years in the journal of chiropractic education: country of origin, academic affiliation, and data versus nondata studies. , 2008, The Journal of chiropractic education.

[14]  P. Moss,et al.  Learning From Our Differences: A Dialogue Across Perspectives on Quality in Education Research , 2009 .

[15]  L. M. Laosa,et al.  Segregation of Children Who Migrate to the U.S. From Puerto Rico , 2001 .

[16]  William B. Kline,et al.  Developing and Submitting Credible Qualitative Manuscripts , 2008 .

[17]  Thomas C. Erren,et al.  The Long and Thorny Road to Publication in Quality Journals , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  H. Cravens,et al.  :An Elusive Science: The Troubling History of Education Research , 2003 .

[19]  P. Hardré,et al.  Faculty Performance Standards: Patterns within Disciplines in the Research University , 2010 .

[20]  David L. Kaplan How to Fix Peer Review: Separating Its Two Functions—Improving Manuscripts and Judging Their Scientific Merit—Would Help , 2005 .

[21]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[22]  Ceri B. Dean,et al.  A Look at the Condition of Rural Education Research: Setting a Direction for Future Research , 2005 .

[23]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  The rules of art : genesis and structure of the literary field , 1997 .

[24]  J. Wellington,et al.  ‘Good books’: is there a future for academic writing within the educational publishing industry? , 2005 .

[25]  Margaret Brown-Sica Library Spaces for Urban, Diverse Commuter Students: A Participatory Action Research Project , 2012, Coll. Res. Libr..

[26]  Robert Donmoyer,et al.  Educational Research in an Era of Paradigm Proliferation: What's a Journal Editor to Do? , 1996 .

[27]  G. Rolfe Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[28]  Bernadette A. Lear New Journals in Education and Psychology: General Trends, Discoverability, and Ubiquitous Journals of the Decade, 2000-2009 , 2012, Coll. Res. Libr..

[29]  Patricia L. Hardré,et al.  Evaluating faculty work: expectations and standards of faculty performance in research universities , 2009 .

[30]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[31]  Keith Wetzel,et al.  From Manuscript to Article: Publishing Educational Technology Research , 2005 .

[32]  Jill Scevak,et al.  A profile of education journals , 2009 .

[33]  Ann E. Austin,et al.  Rethinking Faculty Work: Higher Education's Strategic Imperative , 2007 .

[34]  Jerry Wellington,et al.  Shaping the field: the role of academic journal editors in the construction of education as a field of study , 2005 .

[35]  P. Hardré Faculty Motivation to do Research : Across Disciplines in Research-Extensive Universities , 2011 .

[36]  Juan Miguel Campanario,et al.  Rejecting and resisting Nobel class discoveries: accounts by Nobel Laureates , 2009, Scientometrics.

[37]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  Scientific Achievement and Editorial Board Membership , 2009 .

[38]  A. Ben Wagner Percentile-Based Journal Impact Factors: A Neglected Collection Development Metric. , 2009 .

[39]  A. Parry Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[40]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine. , 1994, JAMA.

[41]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  The Seven Deadly Sins of Communication Research , 2008 .

[42]  R. Slavin Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research , 2002 .

[43]  R. Merton,et al.  Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system , 1971 .

[44]  J. C. Ory,et al.  Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance , 1994 .

[45]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Discipline impact factors: A method for determining core journal lists , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[46]  S. Goodman,et al.  Do readers and peer reviewers agree on manuscript quality? , 1994, JAMA.

[47]  M. Hojat,et al.  Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process , 2003, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[48]  B. Schneider Assessing quality in educational journals , 2008 .

[49]  Richard E. West,et al.  Rigor, Impact and Prestige: A Proposed Framework for Evaluating Scholarly Publications , 2012 .

[50]  Craig B. Howley,et al.  Critique and Fiction: Doing Science Right in Rural Education Research , 2009 .

[51]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline , 2004 .

[52]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Development of Engineering Education as a Rigorous Discipline: A Study of the Publication Patterns of Four Coalitions , 2007 .

[53]  D. C. Phillips A Guide for the Perplexed: Scientific Educational Research, Methodolatry, and the Gold Versus Platinum Standards , 2006 .

[54]  P. Hardré,et al.  Motivational Implications of Faculty Performance Standards , 2012 .

[55]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Journal Production and Journal Impact Factors , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[56]  Y. Lincoln,et al.  Scientific Research in Education , 2004 .

[57]  G. Weiner The Academic Journal: Has it a Future? , 2001 .

[58]  T. Coladarci Improving the Yield of Rural Education Research: An Editor's Swan Song. , 2007 .

[59]  อุษา ศรีจินดารัตน์ Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2012 .

[60]  Gerard A Tobin,et al.  Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[61]  Alan M. Davis,et al.  A Quantitative Assessment of Requirements Engineering Publications - 1963-2008 , 2009, REFSQ.