The use of buffer zones to protect water quality: A review

It is popularly accepted that vegetated buffer zones are effective in removing water pollutants from surface runoff. However, there is a paucity of detailed information about establishing and maintaining buffer zones under different conditions, particularly in large catchments with diverse land uses. This paper reviews information on the application and effectiveness of vegetated buffer zones, and seeks to provide guidelines on their use for water quality control.Investigations into the use of buffer zones are grouped here into three major categories: studies of runoff plots or confined field areas; studies of operational forestry catchments; and studies of agricultural catchments. The degree of effectiveness of buffer zones for water pollution control in all these categories is generally attributed either to physical properties of the buffer zones (such as width, slope, vegetative cover, or soil type) or to the type of pollutant encountered. However, it is clear that although buffer zones have been shown to work well under small scale, experimental conditions, they lack success for water quality control on a broad catchment basis.In this respect, it is important that runoff must enter a buffer zone as shallow, overland flow in order to be slowed or detained, and that excessively channelised runoff will pass through a buffer zone unhindered. Buffer zones positioned close to sources of surface water pollution are therefore more likely to succeed in controlling water quality.It is suggested that although buffer zones are capable of removing pollutants from surface runoff, the proximity of buffer zones to sources of pollution is more important to their effectiveness than has been generally recognised. In view of this, the successful use of buffer zones for water quality control would require that they be comprehensively arranged along streams and around pollution sources in a catchment, and therefore that a large proportion of catchment area be set aside for this purpose. The real value of buffer zones in any situation would rest not only on their ability to control water quality, but on a number of other benefits and costs associated with maintaining large areas of natural vegetation.

[1]  A. Hordacre,et al.  Effects of logging in stream and river buffers on watercourses and water quality in the southern forest of Western Australia , 1988 .

[2]  J. Omernik,et al.  Stream nutrient levels and proximity of agricultural and forest land to streams: Some relationships , 1981 .

[3]  R. C. Doyle,et al.  Effectiveness of forest buffer strips in improving the water quality of manure polluted runoff , 1975 .

[4]  Ralph A. Leonard,et al.  Managing riparian ecosystems to control nonpoint pollution , 1985 .

[5]  P. Clinnick Buffer strip management in forest operations: a review , 1985 .

[6]  E. S. Corbett,et al.  Timber Harvesting Practices and Water Quality in the Eastern United States , 1978, Journal of Forestry.

[7]  J. Gilliam,et al.  Riparian Losses of Nitrate from Agricultural Drainage Waters , 1985 .

[8]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  Nonpoint-source pollution control: A resource conservation perspective , 1982 .

[9]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  Nonpoint source pollution control effectiveness of riparian forests along a coastal plain river , 1989 .

[10]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  An evaluation of the factors determining the effectiveness of water quality buffer zones , 1989 .

[11]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Water Resources and the Land-Water Interface , 1978, Science.

[12]  L. E. Asmussen,et al.  Riparian Forests as Nutrient Filters in Agricultural Watersheds , 1984 .

[13]  L. E. Asmussen,et al.  Nutrient Cycling in an Agricultural Watershed: I. Phreatic Movement , 1984 .

[14]  G. M. Aubertin,et al.  Water Quality After Clearcutting a Small Watershed in West Virginia , 1974 .

[15]  J. R. Miner,et al.  Modeling Dairy Waste Management Systems' Influence on Coliform Concentration in Runoff , 1983 .

[16]  R. Lowrance,et al.  Erosion and deposition in a field/forest system estimated using cesium-137 activity , 1988 .

[17]  E. Hansmann,et al.  Effects of Logging on Periphyton in Coastal Streams of Oregon , 1973 .

[18]  L. E. Asmussen,et al.  Trifluralin Movement in Runoff from a Small Agricultural Watershed , 1980 .

[19]  C. Lant,et al.  Lake and River Quality for Recreation Management and Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[20]  E. S. Corbett,et al.  Best management practices for controlling nonpoint-source pollution on forested watersheds , 1985 .

[21]  P. W. Farrell,et al.  Nutrient dynamics of forested catchments in Southeastern Australia and changes in water quality and nutrient exports following clearing , 1987 .

[22]  C. W. Martin,et al.  Clearcutting patterns affect nitrate and calcium in streams of New Hampshire. , 1980 .

[23]  Richard Lowrance,et al.  Long-term sediment deposition in the riparian zone of a coastal plain watershed , 1986 .