Surface Nanopatterning to Control Cell Growth

A significant challenge in implantology is the design of biomaterials that actively promote functional regeneration of the host tissue while avoiding undesirable tissue responses. This requires selective control of interactions at the tissue/implant interface, the site of a series of complex events that depend on synergistic parameters including surface chemistry, elasticity, topography, and energy. To date, efforts have focused largely on defining how microtexture influences the molecular and cellular events of tissue repair. However, it is now widely recognized that biological substrates on which cells thrive consist of nanostructured molecular networks, and the sensing apparatus of cells operates on the nanometer scale. Reports have emerged showing that nanometer-scale surface features can influence cellular attachment, differentiation, and alignment. The present study takes an important further step by showing how simple chemical treatment can generate multifunctional nanostructured surfaces that control cell growth selectively. These surfaces promote the growth of certain cells while inhibiting that of others, without the addition of any exogenous biological or pharmacological agents. Cellular response to the surface features in the micrometerrange such as grooves, ridges, and wells has been well established. In the past few years, interest has shifted to evaluating the potential of nanostructured biomaterials for affecting cellular activity. Work in this area has been facilitated by recent advances in technologies used to modify

[1]  K. Nguyen,et al.  Nanotopography: cellular responses to nanostructured materials. , 2006, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[2]  J. Amédée,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[3]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[4]  E. A. Cavalcanti-Adam,et al.  Cellular Chemomechanics at Interfaces: Sensing, Integration and Response{ , 2006 .

[5]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings , 2004, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[6]  A. Nanci,et al.  Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  Anne Simmons,et al.  Monitoring cell adhesion on tantalum and oxidised polystyrene using a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[8]  E. Vogler,et al.  Water and the acute biological response to surfaces. , 1999, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[9]  E. Vogler,et al.  Peptide, protein, and cellular interactions with self-assembled monolayer model surfaces. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  Claude Martelet,et al.  Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour , 2003 .

[11]  K. Leong,et al.  Significance of synthetic nanostructures in dictating cellular response. , 2005, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[12]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films : correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion , 2004 .

[13]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  Richard Tuli,et al.  Multilineage differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[16]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Statistical demonstration of the relative effect of surface chemistry and roughness on human osteoblast short-term adhesion , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[17]  M. McKee,et al.  Morphological and immunocytochemical characterization of primary osteogenic cell cultures derived from fetal rat cranial tissue , 1998, The Anatomical record.

[18]  Antonio Nanci,et al.  Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[19]  Peter X Ma,et al.  Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[20]  Sami Alom Ruiz,et al.  Nanotechnology for Cell–Substrate Interactions , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Ruediger C. Braun-Dullaeus,et al.  Vascular proliferation and atherosclerosis: New perspectives and therapeutic strategies , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[22]  C. Leinenbach,et al.  Fatigue and cyclic deformation behaviour of surface-modified titanium alloys in simulated physiological media. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[23]  V. Zhdanov,et al.  Enhancement of protein adsorption induced by surface roughness. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nano-structured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[26]  I. Martin,et al.  Nanoscale Engineering of Biomaterial Surfaces , 2007 .

[27]  Martin Schuler,et al.  Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[28]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[29]  Julian H. George,et al.  Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface , 2005, Science.

[30]  Thomas Jay Webster,et al.  Nanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental tools. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[31]  M. McKee,et al.  Chemical modification of titanium surfaces for covalent attachment of biological molecules. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  H. G. Craighead,et al.  Chemical and topographical patterning for directed cell attachment , 2001 .

[33]  C. Tetta,et al.  Micro and nano-structured surfaces , 2003, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[34]  D. Landolt,et al.  Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. , 2005, Biomaterials.