Hyperbaric vs. isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: a Cochrane systematic review

Both isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine have been used for spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section, but it is not clear if one is better than the other. The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness and safety of hyperbaric bupivacaine compared with isobaric bupivacaine administered during spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. We included 10 studies with 614 subjects in the analysis. There was no evidence of differences either in the risk of conversion to general anaesthesia, with a relative risk (95%CI) of 0.33 (0.09–1.17) (very low quality of evidence), or in the need for supplemental analgesia, the relative risk (95%CI) being 0.61 (0.26–1.41) (very low quality of evidence). There was also no evidence of a difference in the use of ephedrine, the amount of ephedrine used, nausea and vomiting, or headache. Hyperbaric bupivacaine took less time to reach a sensory block height of T4, with a mean difference (95%CI) of −1.06 min (−1.80 to −0.31). Due to the rarity of some outcomes, dose variability, use of adjuvant drugs and spinal technique used, future clinical trials should look into using adequate sample size to investigate the primary outcome of the need for supplemental analgesia.

[1]  P. Kranke,et al.  Patient‐controlled analgesia with remifentanil vs. alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour: a Cochrane systematic review , 2017, Anaesthesia.

[2]  A. Smith,et al.  Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted? , 2017, Anaesthesia.

[3]  R. Rossaint,et al.  Paravertebral block and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery: meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis , 2016, Anaesthesia.

[4]  F. Siddiqui,et al.  Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  C. Fernández-Pérez,et al.  A systematic review of sugammadex vs neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade , 2015, Anaesthesia.

[6]  J. Carlisle,et al.  Reviews, systematic reviews and Anaesthesia , 2015, Anaesthesia.

[7]  S. Oh,et al.  Changes in the Cesarean Section Rate in Korea (1982-2012) and a Review of the Associated Factors , 2014, Journal of Korean medical science.

[8]  G. Afshan,et al.  Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: plain vs hyperbaric bupivacaine. , 2012, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[9]  V. Hancı,et al.  Effects on hypotension incidence: hyperbaric, isobaric, and combinations of bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section , 2012, Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences.

[10]  M. Columb,et al.  Does the Baricity of Bupivacaine Influence Intrathecal Spread in the Prolonged Sitting Position Before Elective Cesarean Delivery? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  A. Saracoglu,et al.  Comparative study of fentanyl and morphine in addition to hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine in combined spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section , 2011, Archives of medical science : AMS.

[12]  R. Mori,et al.  Method of Delivery and Pregnancy Outcomes in Asia: The WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health 2007-2008 , 2011 .

[13]  B. Carvalho,et al.  A Survey of Perioperative and Postoperative Anesthetic Practices for Cesarean Delivery , 2010, Anesthesiology research and practice.

[14]  R. Mori,et al.  Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08 , 2010, The Lancet.

[15]  Andrew F. Smith,et al.  Ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blockade. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  E. Lew,et al.  Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia Using Epidural Volume Extension Leads to Faster Motor Recovery After Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  B. Haglund,et al.  Deliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden, 1973–2000 , 2003, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[18]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  R. Fernando,et al.  DOES DENSITY INFLUENCE THE SPREAD OF INTRATHECAL BUPIVACAINE IN THE PROLONGED SITTING POSITION BEFORE ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION?: P‐69 , 2002 .

[20]  G. McLeod,et al.  Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section with bupivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) in glucose 8 or 80 mg ml(-1). , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[21]  U. Udomsubpayakul,et al.  Epidemic of Cesarean Section at the General, Private and University Hospitals in Thailand , 2000, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[22]  K. Korttila,et al.  Comparison of 9 mg of intrathecal plain and hyperbaric bupivacaine both with fentanyl for cesarean delivery. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  C. Johnson,et al.  Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: isobaric versus hyperbaric solution. , 1999, Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica.

[24]  M. Richardson,et al.  Intrathecal Hypobaric Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Morphine for Cesarean Section , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[25]  L. Tsen,et al.  General anesthesia for cesarean section at a tertiary care hospital 1990-1995: indications and implications. , 1998, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[26]  V. Saldien,et al.  Small-Dose Hyperbaric Versus Plain Bupivacaine During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[27]  G. McLeod,et al.  A Comparison of Glucose 8mg/ml or Glucose 80mg/ml with Bupivacaine 5mg/ml for Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarian Section. , 1998, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[28]  H. King,et al.  Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section: Isobaric vs Hyperbaric Solution , 1997, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[29]  C. Kumar,et al.  Evaluation of sequential administration of plain and hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for lower segment Caesarean section. , 1994, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[30]  P. Vichitvejpaisal,et al.  A comparative study of isobaric and hyperbaric solution of bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in caesarean section. , 1992, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[31]  I. Russell,et al.  Subarachnoid analgesia for caesarean section. A double-blind comparison of plain and hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. , 1987, British journal of anaesthesia.

[32]  I. Russell.  Intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5% for Caesarean section , 1982, Anaesthesia.

[33]  N. Akhtar,et al.  Comparative Study of Intrathecal 0 . 5 % Isobaric Versus 0 . 5 % Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Same Volume and Dose to Assess the Quality of Spinal Anaesthesia and Haemodynamic Changes Occurring During Cesarean Section , 2016 .

[34]  Maria Cristina Ungureanu.  Re: European Commission Consultation on the Eu Corporate Governance Framework Com(2011) 164 , 2011 .

[35]  M. Echevarría,et al.  [Effect of the local anesthetic on visceral pain in cesarean sections done under intradural anesthesia]. , 1996, Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion.