Enterprise education: For all, or just some?

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provocatively enter four imagined worlds of enterprise education with the express aim of contemplating an emerging future. The authors do so not to expressly determine what positioning is most appropriate for enterprise/entrepreneurship education, but rather to consider the issues associated with each of the four imagined worlds. Design/methodology/approach The authors’ approach is built around a combination of cycles of reflective practice and the use of scenario development processes. The authors seek to suspend their collective judgement whilst entering the four imagined worlds, but ultimately do not claim to have hidden their personal biases. Findings It is concluded that enterprise/entrepreneurship education should be shared across the university and not owned by any school or faculty. While the authors find it difficult to dismiss the underlying purpose of each scenario, they sense an opportunity to unite their common focus on the development of a transformative student experience. Practical implications This process has provided unexpected insights into the potential of scenario planning as a tool that could conceivably be employed more often to tackle complex issues, such as the positioning of enterprise/entrepreneurship education in Higher Education. Originality/value This paper, despite its inherent biases, offers the reader an opportunity to gain a sense of the various roles forced upon enterprise/entrepreneurship education by its various key stakeholders. In doing so, the shortcomings of the current situation are highlighted.

[1]  Hao Zhao,et al.  The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Harry Matlay,et al.  Understanding the heterogeneity of entrepreneurship education: going beyond Gartner , 2011 .

[3]  Cecilia Hegarty,et al.  Graduate entrepreneurship: more than child's play , 2008 .

[4]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  Entrepreneurship education within the enterprise culture , 1999, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.

[5]  Guido Reger,et al.  Advantages and Disadvantages of Scenario Approaches for Strategic Foresight , 2005 .

[6]  Alain Fayolle,et al.  Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education , 2007 .

[7]  Deborah V. Brazeal,et al.  Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs , 1994 .

[8]  David Rae,et al.  The Assessment of Enterprise Education in the Secondary Sector: A new approach? , 2011 .

[9]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[10]  Harry Matlay,et al.  Entrepreneurship education: more questions than answers? , 2006 .

[11]  George Wright,et al.  The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[12]  Tom Bourner The Action Learning Handbook: Powerful Techniques for Education, Professional Development and Training , 2006 .

[13]  H. Matlay Entrepreneurship education in the UK: A critical analysis of stakeholder involvement and expectations , 2009 .

[14]  Ian Wilson,et al.  From Scenario Thinking to Strategic Action , 2000 .

[15]  A. Maritz,et al.  A blended learning approach to entrepreneurship education , 2010 .

[16]  Harry Matlay,et al.  The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial outcomes , 2008 .

[17]  Ghulam Nabi,et al.  Graduate entrepreneurship in the developing world: intentions, education and development , 2011 .

[18]  Paul Hannon Enterprise for all? The fragility of enterprise provision across England's HEIs , 2007 .

[19]  N. Krueger The Impact of Prior Entrepreneurial Exposure on Perceptions of New Venture Feasibility and Desirability* , 1993 .

[20]  Alain Fayolle,et al.  From craft to science: teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education , 2008 .

[21]  Andy Penaluna,et al.  The Context of Enterprise Education: Insights into Current Practices , 2012 .

[22]  Josee Audet Concordia Evaluation of Two Approaches to Entrepreneurship Education Using an Intention-Based Model of Venture Creation , 2000 .

[23]  Thomas N. Garavan,et al.  Entrepreneurship education and training programmes: A review and evaluation - Part 2 , 1994 .

[24]  David Scott,et al.  Realism and Educational Research: New Perspectives and Possibilities , 2000 .

[25]  Joakim Wincent,et al.  Entrepreneurial self‐efficacy and business start‐up: developing a multi‐dimensional definition , 2010 .

[26]  J. Dewey How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[27]  Vangelis Souitaris,et al.  Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources , 2007 .

[28]  Allan Gibb,et al.  Can We Build ‘Effective’ Entrepreneurship through Management Development? , 1999 .

[29]  W. A. Lucas,et al.  Enhancing self-efficacy for entrepreneurship and innovation: an educational approach , 2007 .

[30]  Michael D. Reilly,et al.  Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions , 2000 .

[31]  John B. Biggs,et al.  Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does , 1999 .

[32]  Paul Hannon,et al.  Enterprise and entrepreneurship in English higher education: 2010 and beyond , 2012 .

[33]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[34]  Colm O'Gorman,et al.  What is “enterprise education”? An analysis of the objectives and methods of enterprise education programmes in four European countries , 2004 .

[35]  Haiyang Chen,et al.  An analysis of personal financial literacy among college students , 1998 .