Your Morals Depend on Language

Should you sacrifice one man to save five? Whatever your answer, it should not depend on whether you were asked the question in your native language or a foreign tongue so long as you understood the problem. And yet here we report evidence that people using a foreign language make substantially more utilitarian decisions when faced with such moral dilemmas. We argue that this stems from the reduced emotional response elicited by the foreign language, consequently reducing the impact of intuitive emotional concerns. In general, we suggest that the increased psychological distance of using a foreign language induces utilitarianism. This shows that moral judgments can be heavily affected by an orthogonal property to moral principles, and importantly, one that is relevant to hundreds of millions of individuals on a daily basis.

[1]  Eong Jinkyu,et al.  What is the Trolley Problem , 2015 .

[2]  Albert Costa,et al.  “Piensa” twice: On the foreign language effect in decision making , 2014, Cognition.

[3]  A. Colman,et al.  Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems , 2014, Judgment and Decision Making.

[4]  Robb Willer,et al.  For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Rumen Iliev,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Consequences are far away: Psychological distance affects modes of moral decision making. , 2012, Cognition.

[6]  David G. Rand,et al.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed , 2012, Nature.

[7]  B. Opitz,et al.  Emotionality in a second language: It's a matter of time , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  F. Youssef,et al.  Stress alters personal moral decision making , 2012, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[9]  Katrin Starcke,et al.  Anticipatory stress interferes with utilitarian moral judgment , 2012, Judgment and Decision Making.

[10]  D. Coulson Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency , 2011 .

[11]  Norman Segalowitz,et al.  Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency , 2010 .

[12]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Baron,et al.  The Role of Probability of Detection in Judgments of Punishment , 2009 .

[14]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Calculation and Moral Rules , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[15]  C. Caldwell-Harris,et al.  Emotion and lying in a non-native language. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now , 2008, Science.

[17]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making , 2008, Cognition.

[19]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring , 2007 .

[21]  J. Haidt The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology , 2007, Science.

[22]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements , 2007, Nature.

[23]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment , 2004, Neuron.

[24]  C. Harris Bilingual Speakers in the Lab: Psychophysiological Measures of Emotional Reactivity , 2004 .

[25]  Jean‐Marc Dewaele,et al.  The Emotional Force of Swearwords and Taboo Words in the Speech of Multilinguals , 2004 .

[26]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[27]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  How (and where) does moral judgment work? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  M. Zafari,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2007 .

[29]  R. Goodwin,et al.  Perceived and Received Social Support in Two Cultures: Collectivism and Support among British and Spanish Students , 2000 .

[30]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[31]  R. Brislin Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[32]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment , 2022 .

[33]  A. Pavlenko Emotions and Multilingualism , 2005 .

[34]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  9 An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language , 2002 .

[35]  Jeanette Altarriba,et al.  Bilingual sentence processing , 2002 .

[36]  J. Baron Psychological perspectives on justice: Heuristics and biases in equity judgments: A utilitarian approach , 1993 .

[37]  J. Baron,et al.  Psychological perspectives on justice: Conclusion , 1993 .

[38]  Sydney Gregory,et al.  Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values , 1982 .

[39]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .