Signal intensity in fast NMR imaging with short repetition times

Abstract In fast magnetic resonance imaging with short repetition times and balanced phase-encoding gradients, the steady-state transverse magnetization that develops depends on the local relaxation times in a way that differs substantially from more conventional imaging. To optimize these imaging methods for different applications requires an accurate mathematical description of the dependence of the signal intensity on the repetition time, the RF pulse flip angle, and the local relaxation times. Several previously proposed equations for the signal intensity are reviewed, and an expression appropriate to the usual practical application of pulse sequences with constant but unbalanced imaging gradients is derived. Phantom experiments, using water doped with MnCl 2 and NiCl 2 to alter the relaxation times, were used to test the accuracy of these different mathematical expressions for the signal intensity. The new expression provides a good fit to data measured over a large range of TR and flip angle, but implies a transverse relaxation time shorter than that measured by varying the echo time in a spin-echo experiment. Possible sources of this effect are discussed.

[1]  J. Carlson,et al.  Partial flip angle MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[2]  R. Freeman,et al.  Phase and intensity anomalies in fourier transform NMR , 1971 .

[3]  P. Bendel,et al.  An analysis of fast imaging sequences with steady‐state transverse magnetization refocusing , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Transverse coherence in rapid FLASH NMR imaging , 1987 .

[5]  F. Wehrli,et al.  CSF signal enhancement in short TR gradient echo images , 1986 .

[6]  H. Carr STEADY-STATE FREE PRECESSION IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE , 1958 .

[7]  A new method of measuring T2 using steady-state free precession , 1985 .

[8]  H. Kressel Magnetic resonance annual , 1985 .

[9]  R R Edelman,et al.  Contrast in rapid MR imaging: T1- and T2-weighted imaging. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  A. Haase,et al.  Rapid NMR Imaging Using Low Flip-Angle Pulses , 2004 .

[11]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Elimination of transverse coherences in FLASH MRI , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  A. Haase,et al.  Rapid NMR imaging of dynamic processes using the FLASII technique , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  S. Patz,et al.  The application of steady‐state free precession to the study of very slow fluid flow , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Richard R. Ernst,et al.  Diffusion and field‐gradient effects in NMR Fourier spectroscopy , 1974 .

[15]  P. Bendel T2‐weighted contrasts in rapid low flip‐angle imaging , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  R. R. Ernst,et al.  Application of Fourier Transform Spectroscopy to Magnetic Resonance , 1966 .

[17]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Maximizing signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in FLASH imaging. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  G M Bydder,et al.  Comparative efficiency of different pulse sequences in MR imaging. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.