Hausdorff Discretization for Cellular Distances and Its Relation to Coverand Supercover Discretizations

This paper is a sequel to (C. Ronse and M. Tajine, 2000, J. Math. Imaging Vision12, 2000, 219?242), where we introduced a new type of discretization. Let E be a Euclidean space and D a discrete subset of E; in practice, one usually takes E=Rn and D=Zn. Given a compact subset K of E, we call a Hausdorff discretizing set of K any finite subset S of D, whose Hausdorff distance to K is minimal; there is always a greatest Hausdorff discretizing set, which we call the maximal Hausdorff discretization of K. We gave a mathematical characterization of these sets. Here we consider the relation between this new discretization and those based on the intersection of the Euclidean set with the cells (pixels or voxels) corresponding to the discrete points. Of particular interest are what we call cellular distances, that is those for which every Euclidean point in a discrete point's cell is closer to that point than to any other one; for such a distance, the supercover discretization 6] made of all discrete points whose cell intersects the compact set, and the cover discretizations of Andres 1] are Hausdorff discretizing sets; conversely, the supercover is a Hausdorff discretizing set only for cellular distances. Except in some special cases where the discrete space is unhomogeneous, the supercover is the maximal Hausdorff discretization iff the distance is cellular and the cells are all the closed (or open) balls of cellular covering radius; e.g. in the usual case of square cells in Rn, this happens only for the chessboard distance (up to a constant factor).

[1]  Theo Pavlidis,et al.  Algorithms for Graphics and Imag , 1983 .

[2]  Arie E. Kaufman,et al.  Fundamentals of Surface Voxelization , 1995, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[3]  Longin Jan Latecki,et al.  Digitizations preserving shape , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Michel Schmitt Digitization and connectivity , 1998 .

[5]  Mohamed Tajine,et al.  Hausdorff Discretizations of Algebraic Sets and Diophantine Sets , 2000, DGCI.

[6]  Mohamed Tajine,et al.  Hausdorff Sampling of Closed Sets into a Boundedly Compact Space , 2000, Digital and Image Geometry.

[7]  Longin Jan Latecki,et al.  A Realistic Digitization Model of Straight Lines , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[8]  Longin Jan Latecki,et al.  Digital geometric methods in document image analysis , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Daniel Wagner,et al.  Hausdorff Discretization and Its Comparison to Other Discretization Schemes , 1999, DGCI.

[10]  Henk J. A. M. Heijmans,et al.  Discretization of morphological operators , 1992, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[11]  Eric Andres,et al.  Tunnel‐Free Supercover 3D Polygons and Polyhedra , 1997 .

[12]  Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar,et al.  On the Discretization of Morphological Operators , 1997, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[13]  Mohamed Tajine,et al.  Topological Properties of Hausdorff Discretizations , 2000, ISMM.

[14]  Eric Andres,et al.  Supercover of Straight Lines, Planes and Triangles , 1997, DGCI.

[15]  Mohamed Tajine,et al.  An approach to discretization based on the Hausdorff metric , 1998 .

[16]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Morphological sampling , 1991, CVGIP Image Underst..

[17]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Distance transformations in digital images , 1986, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[18]  J. Stoer,et al.  Convexity and Optimization in Finite Dimensions I , 1970 .

[19]  Longin Jan Latecki,et al.  Digitizations preserving topological and differential geometric properties , 1995, Other Conferences.

[20]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .