Symmetry and its role in the crossmodal correspondence between shape and taste

Despite the rapid growth of research on the crossmodal correspondence between visually presented shapes and basic tastes (e.g., sweet, sour, bitter, and salty), most studies that have been published to date have focused on shape contour (roundness/angularity). Meanwhile, other important features, such as symmetry, as well as the underlying mechanisms of the shape–taste correspondence, have rarely been studied. Over two experiments, we systematically manipulated the symmetry and contours of shapes and measured the influences of these variables on shape–taste correspondences. Furthermore, we investigated a potential underlying mechanism, based on the common affective appraisal of stimuli in different sensory modalities. We replicated the results of previous studies showing that round shapes are associated with sweet taste, whereas angular shapes are associated with sour and bitter tastes. In addition, we demonstrated a novel effect that the symmetry group of a shape influences how it is associated with taste. A significant relationship was observed between the taste and appraisal scores of the shapes, suggesting that the affective factors of pleasantness and threat underlie the shape–taste correspondence. These results were consistent across cultures, when we compared participants from Taiwanese and Western (UK, US, Canada) cultures. Our findings highlight that perceived pleasantness and threat are culturally common factors involved in at least some crossmodal correspondences.

[1]  C. Spence Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  M. Johnson,et al.  Circulating microRNAs in Sera Correlate with Soluble Biomarkers of Immune Activation but Do Not Predict Mortality in ART Treated Individuals with HIV-1 Infection: A Case Control Study , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review , 2016 .

[4]  R. Lazarus Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[5]  R. Larsen,et al.  Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. , 1992 .

[6]  J. Aronoff,et al.  The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  C. Spence Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism , 2012 .

[8]  C. Spence,et al.  On tasty colours and colourful tastes? Assessing, explaining, and utilizing crossmodal correspondences between colours and basic tastes , 2015, Flavour.

[9]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[10]  Jasper J. F. van den Bosch,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Marc O Ernst,et al.  Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. , 2001 .

[13]  Frederick A. A. Kingdom,et al.  Shape recognition: convexities, concavities and things in between , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[14]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: Visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  A. T. Poffenberger,et al.  The Feeling Value of Lines. , 1924 .

[17]  M. Behrens,et al.  Signaling in chemosensory systems , 2006, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[18]  A. Gomila,et al.  Is the human initial preference for rounded shapes universal? Preliminary results of an ongoing cross-cultural research , 2013 .

[19]  B. Lyman Representation of Complex Emotional and Abstract Meanings by Simple Forms , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  Helmut Leder,et al.  Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[21]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  If it bleeds, it leads: separating threat from mere negativity. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[22]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion. , 2003 .

[23]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Visual aesthetics and human preference. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  C. Spence,et al.  Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape , 2015 .

[25]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Perception of health from facial cues , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds , 2014 .

[27]  E. McKone,et al.  Asia has the global advantage: Race and visual attention , 2010, Vision Research.

[28]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[29]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences: Assessing shape symbolism for cheese , 2013 .

[30]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[31]  P. Walker,et al.  Cross-sensory mapping of feature values in the size-brightness correspondence can be more relative than absolute. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the shape symbolism of the taste, flavour, and texture of foods and beverages , 2012, Flavour.

[33]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty , 2001, Perception.

[34]  L. Marks The Unity of the Senses , 1978 .

[35]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Visualising Fragrances through Colours: The Mediating Role of Emotions , 2004, Perception.

[36]  David V. Smith,et al.  Taste reactivity in the hamster , 1991, Physiology & Behavior.

[37]  M. Bornstein,et al.  The role of symmetry in infant form discrimination. , 1981, Child development.

[38]  K. Asaoka,et al.  Contribution of different bitter-sensitive taste cells to feeding inhibition in a caterpillar (Manduca sexta). , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.

[39]  L. Marks The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities , 1978 .

[40]  Geoffrey L. Collier,et al.  Affective synesthesia: Extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli , 1996 .

[41]  A. Møller,et al.  Paternity and Multiple Signaling: Effects of a Secondary Sexual Character and Song on Paternity in the Barn Swallow , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[42]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[43]  T. Poggio,et al.  The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition , 1994, Current Biology.

[44]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[45]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Synesthesia: Strong and Weak , 2001 .

[46]  K. Hugenberg,et al.  Vulnerability to disease is associated with a domain‐specific preference for symmetrical faces relative to symmetrical non‐face stimuli , 2011 .

[47]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Implicit affective evaluation of visual symmetry. , 2012, Emotion.

[48]  W. Cochran,et al.  The determination of crystal structures , 1957 .

[49]  Frederick A. A. Kingdom,et al.  Searching for Radial Symmetry , 2017, i-Perception.

[50]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[51]  Moshe Bar,et al.  See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  C. Spence,et al.  As bitter as a trombone: Synesthetic correspondences in nonsynesthetes between tastes/flavors and musical notes , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[53]  C. B. Colby The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[54]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[55]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  Assessing crossmodal correspondences in exotic fruit juices: The case of shape and sound symbolism , 2013 .

[56]  N. Dess,et al.  Taste and emotionality in rats selectively bred for high versus low saccharin intake , 1996 .

[57]  G. Rhodes The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[58]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[59]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty , 2006, NeuroImage.

[60]  S. H. Young,et al.  Expression of bitter taste receptors of the T2R family in the gastrointestinal tract and enteroendocrine STC-1 cells , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  L E Marks,et al.  Perceptual and Linguistic Interactions in Speeded Classification: Tests of the Semantic Coding Hypothesis , 1999, Perception.

[62]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[63]  Martin Giurfa,et al.  Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘beeholder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[64]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences between sounds and tastes , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[65]  Jason Bell,et al.  Symmetry is less than meets the eye , 2015, Current Biology.

[66]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Detection of visual symmetries. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[67]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal Correspondences: Four Challenges. , 2016, Multisensory research.

[68]  Glenn Gamst,et al.  Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation , 2005 .

[69]  J. Glendinning,et al.  Is the bitter rejection response always adaptive? , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[70]  J. H. Kenneth Mental reactions to smell stimuli. , 1923 .

[71]  Christine L Larson,et al.  The shape of threat: simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention. , 2007, Emotion.

[72]  Cesare V Parise,et al.  Crossmodal Correspondences: Standing Issues and Experimental Guidelines. , 2016, Multisensory research.

[73]  M. Bertamini,et al.  No within-object advantage for detection of rotation. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[74]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  On the perception of symmetrical and repeated patterns , 1974 .

[75]  John T. Cowles,et al.  An experimental study of the pairing of certain auditory and visual stimuli. , 1935 .

[76]  Thomas Jacobsen,et al.  Beauty and the brain: culture, history and individual differences in aesthetic appreciation , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[77]  Marcos Nadal,et al.  Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[78]  D. Zellner,et al.  The Color of Music: Correspondence through Emotion , 2007 .

[79]  J. E. Steiner,et al.  Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[80]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[81]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[82]  Charles E. Osgood,et al.  The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies. , 2007 .

[83]  C. Spence,et al.  “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners , 2013, Cognition.

[84]  Cesare Parise,et al.  Audiovisual Cross-Modal Correspondences in the General Population , 2013 .

[85]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Affect as a Psychological Primitive. , 2009, Advances in experimental social psychology.

[86]  Pei Liang,et al.  Invariant effect of vision on taste across two Asian cultures: India and China , 2016 .

[87]  Lester M. Hyman,et al.  Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. , 1992 .

[88]  C. Spence,et al.  Tasting shapes and words , 2011 .

[89]  F. Royer,et al.  Detection of symmetry. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[90]  W. A. Phillips,et al.  The Context Sensitivity of Visual Size Perception Varies across Cultures , 2008, Perception.

[91]  C. Spence,et al.  Smelling shapes: crossmodal correspondences between odors and shapes. , 2013, Chemical senses.

[92]  Francisco Esteves,et al.  The face of wrath: The role of features and configurations in conveying social threat , 2004, Cognition & emotion.

[93]  M. A. Armstrong Groups and symmetry , 1988 .

[94]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Music-to-Color Associations of Single-Line Piano Melodies in Non-synesthetes. , 2016, Multisensory research.

[95]  C. Spence,et al.  When “Bouba” equals “Kiki”: Cultural commonalities and cultural differences in sound-shape correspondences , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[96]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference , 2009 .

[97]  L. Birch Development of food preferences. , 1999, Annual review of nutrition.

[98]  Katja Liebal,et al.  Differences in the Visual Perception of Symmetric Patterns in Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) and Two Human Cultural Groups: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[99]  Phillip Wolff,et al.  Causal reasoning with forces , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[100]  C. Spence,et al.  The semantic basis of taste-shape associations , 2016, PeerJ.

[101]  M. van der Schoot,et al.  The developmental onset of symbolic approximation: beyond nonsymbolic representations, the language of numbers matters , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[102]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Detection of Bilateral Symmetry in Complex Biological Images , 2000, Perception.

[103]  Ophelia Deroy,et al.  Tasting Liquid Shapes: Investigating the Sensory Basis of Cross-modal Correspondences , 2011 .

[104]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[105]  Anthony C. Little,et al.  Domain Specificity in Human Symmetry Preferences: Symmetry is Most Pleasant When Looking at Human Faces , 2014, Symmetry.

[106]  David C. Zhu,et al.  Recognizing Threat: A Simple Geometric Shape Activates Neural Circuitry for Threat Detection , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[107]  R. Stern,et al.  Bitter taste induces nausea , 2011, Current Biology.

[108]  T. P. Hettinger,et al.  What the tongue tells the brain about taste. , 2005, Chemical senses.

[109]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Music–color associations are mediated by emotion , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[110]  Mark J. Hurlstone,et al.  Going with the Grain of Cognition: Applying Insights from Psychology to Build Support for Childhood Vaccination , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[111]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  Assessing the Role of Taste Intensity and Hedonics in Taste-Shape Correspondences. , 2016, Multisensory research.

[112]  Terry D. Blumenthal,et al.  Supertaster, super reactive: Oral sensitivity for bitter taste modulates emotional approach and avoidance behavior in the affective startle paradigm , 2014, Physiology & Behavior.

[113]  Coren L Apicella,et al.  Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[114]  Josep Call,et al.  Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes , 2015, PloS one.

[115]  N. Ryba,et al.  Common Sense about Taste: From Mammals to Insects , 2009, Cell.

[116]  P. Locher,et al.  The perceptual value of symmetry , 1989 .

[117]  R. Norgren,et al.  Electromyographic analysis of the ingestion and rejection of sapid stimuli in the rat. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[118]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[119]  Charles E. Osgood,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of the Affective Meanings of Color , 1973 .

[120]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship , 2001 .

[121]  C. Gross,et al.  Perception of symmetry in infancy. , 1981 .

[122]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  On Perceptual Metaphors , 1996 .

[123]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. , 1994 .

[124]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[125]  L. F. Barrett Valence is a basic building block of emotional life , 2006 .

[126]  M. Bar,et al.  Scene Vision: Making Sense of What We See , 2014 .

[127]  C. Spence,et al.  A fruity note: crossmodal associations between odors and musical notes. , 2012, Chemical senses.

[128]  Pei Liang,et al.  Visual influence of shapes and semantic familiarity on human sweet sensitivity , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[129]  J. Russell,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological the Structure of Current Affect : Controversies and Emerging Consensus on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[130]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A developmental analysis of the polar structure of dimensions , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[131]  N. Ryba,et al.  Coding of Sweet, Bitter, and Umami Tastes Different Receptor Cells Sharing Similar Signaling Pathways , 2003, Cell.

[132]  C. Spence,et al.  On the shapes of flavours: A review of four hypotheses , 2014 .

[133]  C. Spence,et al.  The sweetest thing: the influence of angularity, symmetry, and the number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[134]  I. Rock,et al.  An experimental analysis of visual symmetry , 1963 .

[135]  Charles Spence,et al.  Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[136]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[137]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[138]  Stephen D. Roper,et al.  The cell biology of taste , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[139]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[140]  J. Stevenson The cultural origins of human cognition , 2001 .

[141]  P. Breslin,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Food and Human Taste , 2013, Current Biology.

[142]  J. Aronoff,et al.  How We Recognize Angry and Happy Emotion in People, Places, and Things , 2006 .

[143]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.