Physician Perspectives on Reducing Curative Cancer Treatment Intensity for Populations Underrepresented in Clinical Trials

Abstract Background Historically, clinical trials involved adding novel agents to standard of care to improve survival. There has been a shift to an individualized approach with testing less intense treatment, particularly in breast cancer where risk of recurrence is low. Little is known about physician perspectives on delivering less intense treatment for patients who are not well represented in clinical trials. Methods Open-ended, individual qualitative interviews with medical oncologists explored their perspectives on trials that test less intense treatment for patients with cancer, with a focus on breast cancer. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Four independent coders utilized a content analysis approach to analyze transcripts using NVivo. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted. Results Of the 39 participating physicians, 61.5% felt comfortable extrapolating, 30.8% were hesitant, and 7.7% would not feel comfortable extrapolating trial outcomes to underrepresented populations. Facilitators of comfort included the sentiment that “biology is biology” (such that the cancer characteristics were what mattered), the strength of the evidence, inclusion of subset analysis on underrepresented populations, and prior experience making decisions with limited data. Barriers to extrapolation included potential harm over the patient’s lifetime, concerns about groups that had minimal participants, application to younger patients, and extending findings to diverse populations. Universally, broader inclusion in trials testing lowering chemotherapy was desired. Conclusions The majority (92%) of physicians reported that they would de-implement treatment for patients poorly represented in clinical trials testing less treatment, while expressing concerns about applicability to specific subpopulations. Further work is needed to increase clinical trial representation of diverse populations to safely and effectively optimize treatment for patients with cancer. Trial registration NCT03248258

[1]  M. Andrasik,et al.  Increasing Black, Indigenous and People of Color participation in clinical trials through community engagement and recruitment goal establishment , 2021, PloS one.

[2]  Jeffrey A. Franks,et al.  Survival in the Real World: A National Analysis of Patients Treated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 2021, JCO oncology practice.

[3]  Courtney P. Williams,et al.  Clinical trial representativeness and treatment intensity in a real-world sample of women with early-stage breast cancer. , 2021 .

[4]  A. Wolff,et al.  Patient perspectives on chemotherapy de‐escalation in breast cancer , 2021, Cancer medicine.

[5]  E. Winer,et al.  Palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (PALLAS): interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. , 2021, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  CompassHER2-pCR: Decreasing Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients After Pre-surgery Chemo and Targeted Therapy , 2020, Case Medical Research.

[7]  Docetaxel or Paclitaxel in Reducing Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in African American Patients With Stage I-III Breast Cancer , 2019, Case Medical Research.

[8]  L. Carey,et al.  Implications of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  A. Gibson The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) , 2019, Annals of Oncology.

[10]  David A. Chambers,et al.  Conceptualizing De-Implementation in Cancer Care Delivery. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  S. Siddharth,et al.  Racial Disparity and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in African-American Women: A Multifaceted Affair between Obesity, Biology, and Socioeconomic Determinants , 2018, Cancers.

[12]  D. Babbage,et al.  Quantifying Thematic Saturation in Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018 .

[13]  Lang Li,et al.  Impact of Genetic Ancestry on Outcomes in ECOG-ACRIN-E5103. , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[14]  J. Ivanovich,et al.  Managing breast cancer in younger women: challenges and solutions , 2015, Breast cancer.

[15]  Daniel L. Koller,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Studies for Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in ECOG-5103 and ECOG-1199 , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  M. Ellis,et al.  Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  D. Dohan,et al.  Recruitment practices and the politics of inclusion in cancer clinical trials. , 2012, Medical anthropology quarterly.

[18]  M. Piccart,et al.  Long-term toxic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  Carol L. Brown,et al.  American society of clinical oncology policy statement: disparities in cancer care. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Glenn A. Bowen Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note , 2008 .

[21]  Shari Bolen,et al.  Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: A systematic review , 2008, Cancer.

[22]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[23]  V. Shavers,et al.  Knowledge of the Tuskegee study and its impact on the willingness to participate in medical research studies. , 2000, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[24]  P. F. Kauff Group , 2000, Elegant Design.

[25]  A. Bleyer,et al.  The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies. , 2016, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.