Cell division curtails helper phenotype plasticity and expedites helper T-cell differentiation.

Following activation by antigen, helper T cells differentiate into one of many effector phenotypes. Formulating mechanistic mathematical models combining regulatory networks at the transcriptional, translational and epigenetic level, we study how individual helper T cells may adopt their different phenotypes. For each cytokine phenotype, for example, T helper type 1 (Th1) and type 2 (Th2) cells, we find that the intracellular molecular network allows a cell to adopt one of the three states, which we interpret as naive, active and memory states. Cell division markedly speeds up the differentiation into a particular memory state because of DNA demythelation. In a memory state, cells readily resume production of the same cytokine they produced before. Using stochastic models we show that helper T-cell plasticity (that is, the ability to switch phenotype) is low during clonal expansion. Although most memory cells rapidly secrete the original cytokine upon restimulation, some adopt another phenotype and produce different cytokines, allowing for considerable diversity in the phenotypes that are adopted during a memory response. In summary, we show that helper T-cell division expedites cell differentiation by increasing DNA demethylation. We also show that plasticity is low during the clonal expansion phase, but that helper T cells may adopt alternative phenotypes during a memory response.

[1]  Jaroslav Stark,et al.  Combining cytokine signalling with T-bet and GATA-3 regulation in Th1 and Th2 differentiation: a model for cellular decision-making. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Christof Niehrs,et al.  Gadd45a promotes epigenetic gene activation by repair-mediated DNA demethylation , 2007, Nature.

[3]  John J. Tyson,et al.  A Mathematical Model for the Reciprocal Differentiation of T Helper 17 Cells and Induced Regulatory T Cells , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  E. Yamashita,et al.  Structural insight into maintenance methylation by mouse DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1) , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[6]  Eric H Davidson,et al.  Modeling the dynamics of transcriptional gene regulatory networks for animal development. , 2009, Developmental biology.

[7]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Instruction for Cytokine Expression in T Helper Lymphocytes in Relation to Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[8]  B. Becher,et al.  IL-9 as a mediator of Th17-driven inflammatory disease , 2009, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  Anjana Rao,et al.  Transcription factors T-bet and Runx3 cooperate to activate Ifng and silence Il4 in T helper type 1 cells , 2007, Nature Immunology.

[10]  J. Sedat,et al.  Early transcription and silencing of cytokine genes underlie polarization of T helper cell subsets. , 2001, Immunity.

[11]  V. Kuchroo,et al.  Interleukin-17 and type 17 helper T cells. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  D. Patel,et al.  Structure of DNMT1-DNA Complex Reveals a Role for Autoinhibition in Maintenance DNA Methylation , 2011, Science.

[13]  W. Paul,et al.  In TH2 cells the Il4 gene has a series of accessibility states associated with distinctive probabilities of IL-4 production , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli , 2004, Nature.

[15]  J. Borghans,et al.  Memorizing innate instructions requires a sufficiently specific adaptive immune system. , 2002, International immunology.

[16]  Development and characterization of IL-21–producing CD4+ T cells , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  F. Crick,et al.  Genetical Implications of the Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid , 1953, Nature.

[18]  M. Kubo,et al.  IL-4-Induced GATA-3 Expression Is a Time-Restricted Instruction Switch for Th2 Cell Differentiation1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[19]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  GATA-3 transcriptional imprinting in Th2 lymphocytes: A mathematical model , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Interferons direct Th2 cell reprogramming to generate a stable GATA-3(+)T-bet(+) cell subset with combined Th2 and Th1 cell functions. , 2010, Immunity.

[21]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  Memory and flexibility of cytokine gene expression as separable properties of human TH1 and TH2 lymphocytes , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[22]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Epigenetic Cell Memory by Nucleosome Modification , 2007, Cell.

[23]  Yuka Kanno,et al.  Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD4+ T cells. , 2009, Immunity.

[24]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Estimating Lymphocyte Division and Death Rates from CFSE Data , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[25]  Rob J. de Boer,et al.  From the two-dimensional Th1 and Th2 phenotypes to high-dimensional models for gene regulation. , 2008 .

[26]  A Radbruch,et al.  Stat6-independent GATA-3 autoactivation directs IL-4-independent Th2 development and commitment. , 2000, Immunity.

[27]  W. Paul,et al.  Heterogeneity and plasticity of T helper cells , 2010, Cell Research.

[28]  Pamela L. Schwartzberg,et al.  T Helper Cell Fate Specified by Kinase-Mediated Interaction of T-bet with GATA-3 , 2005, Science.

[29]  P. Hodgkin,et al.  Cell division regulates the T cell cytokine repertoire, revealing a mechanism underlying immune class regulation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  J. Sprent,et al.  Generation and maintenance of memory CD4(+) T Cells. , 2001, Current opinion in immunology.

[31]  Avi Ma’ayan,et al.  Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  Bogdan Tanasa,et al.  Regulation of Th2 differentiation and Il4 locus accessibility. , 2006, Annual review of immunology.

[33]  L. Davis,et al.  Expansion of activated human naïve T‐cells precedes effector function , 2002, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[34]  Chyung-Ru Wang,et al.  Helper T cell differentiation is controlled by the cell cycle. , 1998, Immunity.

[35]  Martin S Zand,et al.  Discrete Event Modeling of CD4+ Memory T Cell Generation1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[36]  R. J. Hocking,et al.  TGFbeta in the context of an inflammatory cytokine milieu supports de novo differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells. , 2006, Immunity.

[37]  Christopher B Wilson,et al.  Epigenetic control of T-helper-cell differentiation , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[38]  S. Durham,et al.  Th22 cells represent a distinct human T cell subset involved in epidermal immunity and remodeling. , 2009, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[39]  Alf Hamann,et al.  Epigenetic control of FOXP3 expression: the key to a stable regulatory T-cell lineage? , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[40]  Laurie H Glimcher,et al.  A Novel Transcription Factor, T-bet, Directs Th1 Lineage Commitment , 2000, Cell.

[41]  P. Lásló,et al.  Multilineage Transcriptional Priming and Determination of Alternate Hematopoietic Cell Fates , 2006, Cell.

[42]  R. Flavell,et al.  Demethylation of a specific hypersensitive site in the Th2 locus control region , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  D. Littman,et al.  The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells. , 2006, Cell.

[44]  T. Nomura,et al.  Control of Regulatory T Cell Development by the Transcription Factor Foxp3 , 2002 .

[45]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.

[46]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Short-term memory in gene induction reveals the regulatory principle behind stochastic IL-4 expression , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[47]  P. Hodgkin,et al.  A model of immune regulation as a consequence of randomized lymphocyte division and death times , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al.  Inheritance of epigenetic chromatin silencing. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  A. Mirsky,et al.  ACETYLATION AND METHYLATION OF HISTONES AND THEIR POSSIBLE ROLE IN THE REGULATION OF RNA SYNTHESIS. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  L. Chodosh,et al.  Hlx is induced by and genetically interacts with T-bet to promote heritable TH1 gene induction , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[51]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Diversity and Plasticity of Th Cell Types Predicted from Regulatory Network Modelling , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[52]  Hamid Bolouri,et al.  A gene regulatory network armature for T lymphocyte specification , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Frank Baas,et al.  Human T-cell memory consists mainly of unexpanded clones. , 2010, Immunology letters.

[54]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  W. Paul,et al.  Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations (*). , 2010, Annual review of immunology.

[56]  Richard A Flavell,et al.  The Transcription Factor GATA-3 Is Necessary and Sufficient for Th2 Cytokine Gene Expression in CD4 T Cells , 1997, Cell.

[57]  A. Yoshimura,et al.  Foxp3 Inhibits RORγt-mediated IL-17A mRNA Transcription through Direct Interaction with RORγt*♦ , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[58]  P. Soroosh,et al.  Th9 and allergic disease , 2009, Immunology.

[59]  D. Bates,et al.  Crystal structures of multiple GATA zinc fingers bound to DNA reveal new insights into DNA recognition and self-association by GATA. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  Yuka Kanno,et al.  T-bet regulates Th1 responses through essential effects on GATA-3 function rather than on IFNG gene acetylation and transcription , 2006, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[61]  R. Germain,et al.  Variability and Robustness in T Cell Activation from Regulated Heterogeneity in Protein Levels , 2008, Science.

[62]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Stochastic Models of Lymphocyte Proliferation and Death , 2010, PloS one.

[63]  J. Hemmen,et al.  Cytokine-modulated regulation of helper T cell populations. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[64]  N. Friedman,et al.  Densely Interconnected Transcriptional Circuits Control Cell States in Human Hematopoiesis , 2011, Cell.

[65]  T. P. Carvalho,et al.  Quantitative insights into stochastic monoallelic expression of cytokine genes , 2007, Immunology and cell biology.

[66]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Sequential polarization and imprinting of type 1 T helper lymphocytes by interferon-gamma and interleukin-12. , 2009, Immunity.

[67]  Julie A. Law,et al.  Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[68]  Christoph Wilhelm,et al.  Transforming growth factor-β 'reprograms' the differentiation of T helper 2 cells and promotes an interleukin 9–producing subset , 2008, Nature Immunology.