Towards an Improved Single - Frequency Ionospheric Correction: Focus on Mid - Latitudes

The modelling of the Total Electron Content (TEC) plays an important role in global satellite navigation systems (GNSS) accuracy, especially for single frequency receivers, the most common ones constituting the mass market. For the latter and in the framework of Galileo, the NeQuick model has been chosen for correcting the ionospheric error contribution and will be integrated into a global algorithm providing the users with daily updated information. In order to reach the ionosphere error correction level objective, the model itself as well as its use for Galileo are investigated. In our comparison process, we take advantage of various ionosphere data from several European stations (Dourbes in Belgium, El Arenosillo and Roquetes in Spain) where ionosonde and GPS TEC data are available for different solar activity levels. These data allow us to study NeQuick representation of the ionosphere at mid-latitudes. Constraining the model with ionosonde measurements, we investigate the difference between GPS-derived vertical TEC and corresponding values from NeQuick for a high solar activity level (year 2002). With this approach, we reach residual errors of less than 20% in standard deviation. We especially highlight the improvements from the latest (second) version of NeQuick and show the critical importance of the topside formulation. Finally we analyse the model residual errors when using an ingestion scheme for Dourbes station. We compute daily effective values of solar flux adapting NeQuick slant TEC values to GPS-derived ones and we show that residual errors in vertical TEC are partially resorbed thanks to this technique.

[1]  Karl Rawer,et al.  Replacement of the present sub-peak plasma density profile by a unique expression , 1982 .

[2]  Benoît Bidaine.  Ionosphere Crossing of GALILEO Signals , 2006 .

[3]  Sandro M. Radicella,et al.  Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS , 2007 .

[4]  Sandro M. Radicella,et al.  The evolution of the DGR approach to model electron density profiles , 2001 .

[5]  Sandro M. Radicella,et al.  An analytical model of the electron density profile in the ionosphere , 1990 .

[6]  Roberto Prieto-Cerdeira,et al.  NeQuick: In-Depth Analysis and New Developments , 2006 .

[7]  Brent M. Ledvina,et al.  The ionosphere, radio navigation, and global navigation satellite systems , 2005 .

[8]  D. Anderson,et al.  Algorithms for minimization without derivatives , 1974 .

[9]  René Warnant,et al.  Assessment of the NeQuick model at mid-latitudes using GNSS TEC and ionosonde data , 2010 .

[10]  R. Warnant,et al.  The increase of the ionospheric activity as measured by GPS , 2000 .

[11]  Reinhart Leitinger,et al.  Topside electron density in IRI and NeQuick: Features and limitations , 2006 .

[12]  Reinhart Leitinger,et al.  An improved bottomside for the ionospheric electron density, model NeQuick , 2005 .

[13]  Sandro M. Radicella,et al.  A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model , 2008 .

[14]  R. Warnant,et al.  Modelling the Mid-latitude Ionosphere: Assessment of the NeQuick Model using GPS TEC and Ionosonde Data , 2007 .

[15]  Sandro M. Radicella,et al.  A family of ionospheric models for different uses , 2000 .

[16]  Sandro M. Radicella,et al.  A near‐real‐time model‐assisted ionosphere electron density retrieval method , 2006 .

[17]  S. M. Radicella,et al.  The improved DGR analytical model of electron density height profile and total electron content in the ionosphere , 1995 .