DESIGN PROCESS ELICITATION THROUGH THE EVALUATION OF INTEGRATED MODEL STRUCTURES

Refinement of product design processes is recognized as a means for organizations to impact lead times, cost, and quality. Although methods such as the design structure matrix (DSM) exist to analyze design processes, their applications have been limited by overhead in collecting data and maintaining accurate representations. Representation timeliness and resolution issues have typically led to static, high-level process views. In this work, the design process is derived dynamically from an evolving network of design resources inter-related by service dependencies. This network is created to simulate the state of a product design. Through the analysis of resulting dependencies, high-resolution networks of task and parameter interdependency can be extracted. A software module is developed to provide the service of automatically extracting and analyzing the structure of service exchanges in integrated design models. The module provides a matrix or DSM visualization of service relationships and mechanisms to sort resources according to service priority. This allows for realtime evaluation of design processes as models of the product evolve, providing information to guide the strategic addition of resources.

[1]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[2]  Christopher Alexander Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[3]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes , 1991 .

[4]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[5]  Nicola Senin,et al.  Distribution modeling and evaluation of product design problems , 1998, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  Massimo Egidi Organizational Learning, Problem Solving and the Division of Labour , 1992 .

[7]  René Bañares-Alcántara,et al.  Representing the engineering design process: two hypotheses , 1991, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  Earll M. Murman,et al.  Product development process capture and display using Web-based technologies , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[9]  Earl David Sacerdoti,et al.  A Structure for Plans and Behavior , 1977 .

[10]  Michael P. Wellman A computational market model for distributed configuration design , 1994, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[11]  Eric W. Weisstein,et al.  The CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics , 1999 .

[12]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[13]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  David G. Ullman,et al.  What to do next: Using problem status to determine the course of action , 1997 .

[15]  David Wallace,et al.  WEB-BASED COLLABORATIVE DESIGN MODELING AND DECISION SUPPORT , 1998 .

[16]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.