Karyometry detects subvisual differences in chromatin organization state between cribriform and flat high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

This digital texture analysis-based study evaluates the chromatin organization state in flat and cribriform high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), in the adjacent normal looking secretory epithelium and in the co-occurring adenocarcinoma. Digital texture analysis (karyometry) was carried out on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from 24 radical prostatectomy specimens with high-grade PIN (12 with flat and 12 with cribriform architectural pattern, respectively) and cancer. Quantification was also conducted on the normal looking secretory epithelium. Discriminant analysis and the nonsupervised learning algorithm P-index were used to identify suitable subsets of features useful for the discrimination and classification of pathological groups and to explore multivariate data structure in the pathological subgroups. The average nuclear abnormality increases monotonically from the histologically normal appearing secretory epithelium to high-grade PIN and to adenocarcinoma. The nuclei from the so-called perimeter compartment of the flat high-grade PIN lesions show a higher nuclear abnormality compared to the nuclei of the cribriform high-grade PINs. Discriminant analysis shows that flat and cribriform high-grade PINs fall into two populations. Processing by the nonsupervised learning algorithm P-index revealed the existence of three well-defined, distinct subpopulations of nuclei of different chromatin phenotype. In the flat high-grade PIN lesions the proportions of nuclei in the three subpopulations are 16.5% (low abnormality), 25.0% (mid abnormality) and 58.5% (high abnormality), respectively. In the cribriform high-grade PIN lesions, 100% of the nuclei are in the mid-abnormality subpopulation. These differences are also discernible in the co-occurring adenocarcinoma and the histologically normal appearing secretory epithelium. To conclude, karyometry and statistical analysis detect the existence of distinct cell subpopulations of different chromatin packaging and phenotype, with the nuclei from the flat high-grade PIN lesions, adjacent normal looking epithelium and co-occurring adenocarcinoma expressing a greater nuclear abnormality than in the specimens with cribriform high-grade PIN.

[1]  J. McNeal,et al.  Patterns of differentiation and proliferation in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: Significance for cancer progression , 2000, The Prostate.

[2]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[3]  P. Sharpe Methods of Cell Separation , 1988 .

[4]  P. Bartels,et al.  Evaluation of the Papanicolaou stain for computer assisted cellular pattern recognition. , 1973, Acta Cytologica.

[5]  James Ranger-Moore,et al.  Subvisual changes in chromatin organization state are detected by karyometry in the histologically normal urothelium in patients with synchronous papillary carcinoma. , 2003, Human pathology.

[6]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  P. Bartels,et al.  Karyometry of secretory cell nuclei in high‐grade PIN lesions * , 2001, The Prostate.

[8]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Diagnosis of Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Prostate Working Group 1 Consensus Report , 2000, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.

[9]  F. Algaba,et al.  Morphological identification of the patterns of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and their importance , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  R. Montironi,et al.  Precancerous lesions and conditions of the prostate: from morphological and biological characterization to chemoprevention. , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Architectural patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1993, Human pathology.

[12]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[13]  P. Bartels,et al.  Subtle Morphological and Molecular Changes in Normal-Looking Epithelium in Prostates with Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Cancer , 1999, European Urology.

[14]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[15]  R. Montironi,et al.  Changes in the normal-looking epithelium in prostates with PIN or cancer. , 1999, Advances in clinical pathology : the official journal of Adriatic Society of Pathology.

[16]  R. Montironi,et al.  Precancerous Lesions and Conditions of the Prostate , 2002 .

[17]  M. Weinstein Digital image analysis of proliferative index: two distinct populations of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in close proximity to adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1998, Human pathology.

[18]  B H Mayall,et al.  Characterization of chromatin distribution in cell nuclei. , 1986, Cytometry.

[19]  M. M. Bhandari Euclidean cluster analysis in moth bean over two different environments , 1991 .

[20]  R. Montironi,et al.  Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer. , 2002, Panminerva Medica (Testo stampato).

[21]  P. Bartels,et al.  Computer Analysis of Lymphocyte Images , 1980 .

[22]  P H Bartels,et al.  Chromatin texture signatures in nuclei from prostate lesions. , 1998, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[23]  R. Montironi,et al.  Nuclear changes in the normal-looking columnar epithelium adjacent to and distant from prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer , 2000, Virchows Archiv.

[24]  James Ranger-Moore,et al.  Karyometry of nuclei from actinic keratosis and squamous cell cancer of the skin. , 2003, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[25]  C. Cinti,et al.  pRb2/p130 and p107 control cell growth by multiple strategies and in association with different compartments within the nucleus * , 2001, Journal of cellular physiology.

[26]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours , 1987, UICC International Union Against Cancer.

[27]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Pathological Findings in TRUS Prostatic Biopsy—Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Importance , 2002 .