Agreement between values for arterial and end-tidal partial pressures of carbon dioxide in spontaneously breathing, critically ill dogs.

OBJECTIVE To determine agreement between arterial partial pressures of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) and end-tidal partial pressures of carbon dioxide (PETCO(2)) measured with a nasal catheter in spontaneously breathing, critically ill dogs. DESIGN Validation study. ANIMALS 26 client-owned dogs admitted to an intensive care unit for various conditions. PROCEDURES PaCO(2) was measured with a commercial blood gas analyzer, and PETCO(2) was measured with a sidestream capnograph attached to a nasal catheter. Measurements were obtained twice (ie, with and without supplemental oxygen). Paired values were compared by means of the Pearson correlation method. Level of agreement was assessed by means of the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS Mean difference between PaCO(2) and PETCO(2) when dogs did not receive supplemental oxygen (mean +/- SD, 3.95 +/- 4.92 mm Hg) was significantly lower than mean difference when dogs did receive supplemental oxygen (6.87 +/- 6.42 mm Hg). Mean difference in dogs with a condition affecting the respiratory system (8.55 +/- 5.43 mm Hg) was significantly higher than mean difference in dogs without respiratory tract disease (3.28 +/- 3.23 mm Hg). There was a significant linear correlation and good agreement between measured values of PaCO(2) and PETCO(2). Catheter size, ventilatory status, and outcome were not significantly associated with mean difference between PaCO(2) and PETCO(2). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested that nasal capnography is a clinically relevant method of estimating PaCO(2) in spontaneously breathing, critically ill dogs, but that values should be interpreted with caution in dogs receiving supplemental oxygen and in dogs with conditions affecting the respiratory system.

[1]  T. Ichinohe,et al.  Is measurement of end-tidal CO2 through a nasal cannula reliable? , 1997, Anesthesia progress.

[2]  J. Goldman A simple, easy, and inexpensive method for monitoring ETCO2 through nasal cannulae. , 1987, Anesthesiology.

[3]  M. Beal,et al.  Emergency vascular access. , 2000, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[4]  G. Gallioli,et al.  End tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in spontaneously breathing, nonintubated patients. A clinical comparison between conventional sidestream and microstream capnometers. , 2001, Minerva anestesiologica.

[5]  D. Pang,et al.  Partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 sampled via an intranasal catheter as a substitute for partial pressure of arterial CO2 in dogs , 2007 .

[6]  D. Hughes,et al.  Vascular access: theory and techniques in the small animal emergency patient. , 2000, Clinical techniques in small animal practice.

[7]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[8]  S. Luna,et al.  Comparison of a sidestream capnograph and a mainstream capnograph in mechanically ventilated dogs. , 2002, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[9]  C. Wagner-Mann,et al.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral nasal catheters for oxygen administration in dogs , 2002 .

[10]  R. Wiebe,et al.  Comparison of pediatric end-tidal CO2 measured with nasal/oral cannula circuit and capillary PCO2. , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  R. Friesen,et al.  End-tidal PCO2 monitoring via nasal cannulae in pediatric patients: Accuracy and sources of error , 1996, Journal of Clinical Monitoring.

[12]  J. Hendricks,et al.  PRACTICALITY, USEFULNESS, AND LIMITS OF END-TIDAL CARBON DIOXIDE MONITORING IN CRITICAL SMALL ANIMAL PATIENTS , 1994 .