The Relationship Between Grades and the Lexical Richness of Student Essays

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between lexical richness and the grades on essays produced by Swedish university students of English in order to shed light on the extent to which lexical richness is a predictor of overall essay quality. To this end, essays produced by 37 advanced learners of English were analyzed using a lexical richness measure that calculates the proportion of advanced vocabulary. The lexical richness score of the student essays were related to the following three variables: essay grade, course grade and vocabulary knowledge as measured by three discrete-item tests. In addition, a 14-item questionnaire administered to the teachers at the English department eliciting information about their essay assessment procedures was analyzed, in order to shed light on the relationship between the weight teachers put on lexical richness and the grade they award essays with different lexical richness profiles. The results show that there is a relationship between use of advanced vocabulary in student essays and the overall course grade. However, no relationship was found between lexical richness and overall essay quality as reflected by faculty teachers’ ratings. A possible explanation is that a majority of the surveyed faculty teachers state that their assessment of essay quality is primarily based on content and grammar features rather than lexical features.

[1]  I. S. P. Nation,et al.  Learning Vocabulary in Another Language: Appendixes , 2001 .

[2]  Scott Jarvis,et al.  Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity , 2002 .

[3]  Mcneill Brian.  A summary of 'A comparative statistical assessment of different types of writing by Japanese EFL college students' , 2007 .

[4]  Roger Kenworthy,et al.  Timed versus At-Home Assessment Tests: Does Time Affect the Quality of Second Language Learners' Written Compositions?. , 2006 .

[5]  Ann Raimes,et al.  WHAT UNSKILLED ESL STUDENTS DO AS THEY WRITE: A CLASSROOM STUDY OF COMPOSING , 1985 .

[6]  J. Carson,et al.  Students' Perceptions of EAP Writing Instruction and Writing Needs Across the Disciplines , 1994 .

[7]  李嘉麗.  Is lexical richness an essential criterion in judging a piece of writing , 1997 .

[8]  Batia Laufer,et al.  The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language : Same or different ? , 1998 .

[9]  Cheryl A. Engber.  The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions , 1995 .

[10]  Alister Cumming,et al.  Writing Strategies in Japanese as a Foreign Language: Lowering or Keeping Up the Standards. , 1989 .

[11]  T. Santos.  Professors' Reactions to the Academic Writing of Nonnative-Speaking Students. , 1988 .

[12]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test , 2001 .

[13]  James Muncie.  Process writing and vocabulary development: comparing Lexical Frequency Profiles across drafts , 2002 .

[14]  Batia Laufer,et al.  Beyond 2000: A measure of productive lexicon in a second language , 1995 .

[15]  Moira Linnarud.  Lexis in composition : a performance analysis of Swedish learners' written English , 1986 .

[16]  David D. Qian,et al.  Investigating the Relationship Between Vocabulary Knowledge and Academic Reading Performance: An Assessment Perspective , 2002 .

[17]  P. Nation,et al.  Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production , 1995 .

[18]  Tom Cobb,et al.  Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of Teaching English as a Second Language trainees , 2004 .

[19]  Gusti Gede Astika,et al.  Analytical Assessments of Foreign Students' Writing , 1993 .

[20]  P. Nation,et al.  A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability , 1999 .

[21]  David Corson,et al.  The Learning and Use of Academic English Words. , 1997 .

[22]  Averil Coxhead.  A New Academic Word List , 2000 .