Prototype constructions in early language acquisition

Abstract In this paper we bring together several lines of cross-linguistic research to demonstrate the role of prototypicality in young children's acquisition of the transitive construction. Much research has shown that young children are slow to form abstract constructions because they fail to see the more general applicability of syntactic markers such as word order and case marking. Here we attempt to explain this fact by investigating the nature of the language children do and do not hear, specifically, the reliability and availability of the linguistic cues they are exposed to. We suggest that constructions redundantly marked with multiple cues could have a special status as a nucleus around which the prototype forms—which makes it difficult for them to isolate the functional significance of each cue. The implications of this view for language acquisition are discussed within a usage-based framework.

[1]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1991 .

[2]  Kidd Ej,et al.  Examining the role of lexical frequency in children's acquisition and processing of sentential complements. , 2006 .

[3]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[4]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[5]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order , 2005 .

[6]  Ewa Dabrowska,et al.  Questions with long-distance dependencies: A usage-based perspective , 2008 .

[7]  Michael Tomasello.  The New Psychology of Language , 1998 .

[8]  E. Bates,et al.  Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  J. Sokolov,et al.  Cue validity in Hebrew sentence comprehension , 1988, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical Construction Theory and the Familiar Dichotomies , 1989 .

[11]  M. Grice,et al.  The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements , 2006, Cognition.

[12]  P. Harris,et al.  When does an ostrich become a bird? The role of typicality in early word comprehension. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[13]  M. Tomasello.  Beyond formalities: The case of language acquisition , 2005 .

[14]  Susan Foster-Cohen,et al.  CONSTRUCTING A LANGUAGE: A USAGE-BASED THEORY OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[15]  Elisabeth Rieken.  Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective , 2009 .

[16]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language , 2004, Cognition.

[17]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[19]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Examining the role of lexical frequency in the acquisition and processing of sentential complements , 2006 .

[20]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Similarity in Language, Thought and Perception , 1995 .

[21]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Similarity is like analogy: Structural alignment in comparison , 1995 .

[22]  Stan A. Kuczaj,et al.  The Development of Word Meaning , 1986 .

[23]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  D. Gentner,et al.  Similarity and the development of rules , 1998, Cognition.

[25]  D. Slobin,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 2000 .

[26]  C. Fisher,et al.  Learning Words and Rules , 2006, Psychological science.

[27]  M. Tomasello.  Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[28]  Why a mind is necessary: Conceptualization, grammar and linguistic semantics , 2000 .

[29]  M. Tomasello.  First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[30]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[31]  M. Tomasello.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[32]  P. A. Villiers,et al.  A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[33]  Roger W. Brown,et al.  A First Language: The Early Stages , 1974 .

[34]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian , 1984 .

[35]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  The Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology: A Prototype Account. , 1995 .

[36]  M. Tomasello.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 2003 .

[37]  J. M. Anglin,et al.  Semantic and Conceptual Knowledge Underlying the Child’s Words , 1986 .

[38]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive , 1987, Cognition.

[39]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  A construction based analysis of child directed speech , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  B MacWhinney,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. , 1984, Child development.

[41]  David Gil,et al.  The World Atlas of Language Structures , 2005 .

[42]  Danielle E. Matthews,et al.  Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension: A visual world study of pronoun resolution , 2010 .

[43]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , 1998 .

[44]  Andrea Moro.  The origins of grammar by Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, MIT Press, 1997. £25.50 (x + 230 pages) ISBN 0 262 08242 X , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  G. Wells.  Learning through Interaction: The Study of Language Development , 1981 .

[46]  J. Bransford,et al.  Abstraction of visual patterns. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[48]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[49]  M. Tomasello,et al.  What preschool children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders , 2001 .

[50]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. , 2003, Developmental science.

[51]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Rapid learning of an abstract language-specific category: Polish children's acquisition of the instrumental construction , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[52]  M. Tomasello.  The new psychology of language : cognitive and functional approaches to language structure , 1998 .

[53]  M. Tomasello,et al.  A New Look at the Acquisition of Relative Clauses , 2005 .

[54]  Mira Ariel.  Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language (review) , 2008 .

[55]  Michael P Maratsos,et al.  A study in novel word learning: The productivity of the causative , 1987 .

[56]  Laura A. Michaelis,et al.  TOWARD A CONSTRUCTION-BASED THEORY OF LANGUAGE FUNCTION : THE CASE OF NOMINAL EXTRAPOSITION , 1996 .

[57]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[58]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Children Extend Both Words and Non-Verbal Actions to Novel Exemplars , 2003 .

[59]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[60]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .

[61]  N. Akhtar,et al.  Acquiring basic word order: evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[62]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Children's understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English , 2009 .

[63]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  The Primacy of Aspect in First and Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[64]  Perla B. Gámez,et al.  Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[65]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The acquisition of complement clause constructions: A sentence repetition study. , 2005 .

[66]  S. Thompson,et al.  The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar , 1984 .

[67]  J. V. Berkum,et al.  On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking , 2006 .

[68]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Constructions at Work , 2005 .

[69]  D. Slobin.  Mind, Code and Text , 1997 .

[70]  Martyn D. Barrett,et al.  Early Semantic Representations and Early Word-Usage , 1986 .

[71]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development , 1982 .

[72]  Kirsten Abbot-Smith,et al.  German children's comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. , 2008, Child development.

[73]  John W. Du Bois.  THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY OF LANGUAGE , 2003 .