Relational Messages Associated with Nonverbal Behaviors.

Based on the assumptions that relational messages are multidimensional and that they are frequently communicated by nonverbal cues, this experiment manipulated five nonverbal cues -eye contact, proximity, body lean, smiling, and touch - to determine what meanings they convey along four relational message dimensions. Subjects (N= 150) observed 2 out of 40 videotaped conversational segments in which a male-female dyad presented various combinations of the nonverbal cues. High eye contact, close proximity, forward body lean, and smiling all conveyed greater intimacy, attraction, and trust. Low eye contact, a distal position, backward body lean, and the absence of smiling and touch communicated greater detachment. High eye contact, close proximity, and smiling also communicated less emotional arousal and greater composure, while high eye contact and close proximity alone conveyed greater dominance and control. Effects of combinations of cues and sex-differences are also reported.

[1]  A. R. Gilliland,et al.  The Measurement of Aggressiveness. , 1921 .

[2]  E. Hall.  The Silent Language , 1959 .

[3]  H. Scheffé.  The Analysis of Variance , 1960 .

[4]  Warmth and Expressive Movements , 1961 .

[5]  R. Exline.  Explorations in the process of person perception: visual interaction in relation to competition, sex, and need for affiliation , 1963 .

[6]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[7]  R. Exline,et al.  VISUAL BEHAVIOR IN A DYAD AS AFFECTED BY INTERVIEW CONTENT AND SEX OF RESPONDENT. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  W. Schutz.  The Interpersonal Underworld , 1966 .

[9]  H M Rosenfeld,et al.  Instrumental affiliative functions of facial and gestural expressions. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  F. N. Willis.  Initial speaking distance as a function of the speakers’ relationship , 1966 .

[11]  M. King.  Interpersonal relations in preschool children and average approach distance. , 1966, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[12]  Communications theory and research strategy: a metatheoretical analysis. , 1967, The Journal of communication.

[13]  Albert Mehbabian.  Orientation behaviors and nonverbal attitude communication. , 1967 .

[14]  K. Strongman,et al.  Dominance hierarchies and conflict in eye contact , 1968 .

[15]  M. Patterson,et al.  Spatial Factors in Social Interactions , 1968 .

[16]  A. Mehrabian.  Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator. , 1968, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[17]  K. Little,et al.  Cultural variations in social schemata. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Albert Mehrabian,et al.  Encoding of attitude by a seated communicator via posture and position cues. , 1969 .

[19]  C A Kiesler,et al.  Visual behavior and face-to-face distance during interaction. , 1969, Sociometry.

[20]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Nonverval concomitants of perceived and intended persuasiveness. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  A. Mehrabian.  Significance of posture and posiion in the communication of attitude and status relationships. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  The Effect of Interpersonal Looking Duration on Dominance Judgments , 1969 .

[23]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Personal space : the behavioral basis of design , 1970 .

[24]  M. Patterson,et al.  Interpersonal distance and impression formation. , 1970, Journal of personality.

[25]  D. Byrne,et al.  Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. , 1970 .

[26]  E. Goffman.  Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order , 1971 .

[27]  M. Kinnucan,et al.  "Touch Me, Like Me": Testing an Encounter Group Assumption , 1972 .

[28]  J. R. Aiello.  A test of equilibrium theory: Visual interaction in relation to orientation, distance and sex of interactants , 1972 .

[29]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Categories of Social Behavior , 1972 .

[30]  M. Patterson.  Compensation in Nonverbal Immediacy Behaviors: A Review , 1973 .

[31]  William Schiff,et al.  Observer judgment of social interaction: Eye contact and relationship inferences. , 1974 .

[32]  C. Kleinke,et al.  Effects of gaze, touch, and use of name on evaluation of “Engaged” couples☆ , 1974 .

[33]  D. Fromme,et al.  Dominance and sex differences in nonverbal responses to differential eye contact , 1974 .

[34]  N. Russo.  Eye contact, interpersonal distance, and the equilibrium theory. , 1975 .

[35]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of human communication , 1975 .

[36]  M. Patterson.  An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. , 1976 .

[37]  I. Altman,et al.  Relationship of Nonverbal Behavior to the Social Penetration Process , 1976 .

[38]  Frank W. Schneider,et al.  Affiliative conflict theory: An investigation of the intimacy equilibrium and compensation hypothesis. , 1976 .

[39]  S. Beebe,et al.  Effects of Eye Contact, Posture and Vocal Inflection upon Credibility and Comprehension. , 1976 .

[40]  R. Heslin,et al.  Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. , 1976, Sociometry.

[41]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and personal space: Research review and theoretical model , 1976 .

[42]  E. Langer,et al.  Staring and approach: An interpretation of the stare as a nonspecific activator. , 1976 .

[43]  I. Firestone,et al.  Reconciling verbal and nonverbal models of dyadic communication , 1977 .

[44]  Robert A. Snyder,et al.  The measurement of the construct of dominance and its relationship to nonverbal behavior. , 1977 .

[45]  John R. Aiello,et al.  A further look at equilibrium theory: Visual interaction as a function of interpersonal distance , 1977 .

[46]  Arthur P. Bochner,et al.  The Conceptual Domain of Interpersonal Communication Behavior: A Factor-Analytic Study , 1977 .

[47]  Albert Mehrabian,et al.  Public Places and Private Spaces , 1977 .

[48]  P. Andersen,et al.  The measurement of nonverbal immediacy , 1979 .

[49]  H. Ehrlichman,et al.  Interpersonal Gaze and Helping Behavior. , 1979, The Journal of social psychology.

[50]  J. F. Andersen.  Teacher Immediacy as a Predictor of Teaching Effectiveness , 1979 .

[51]  D. Stacks,et al.  A communicative model of violations of distancing expectations , 1979 .

[52]  H. Rosenfeld,et al.  The effect of postural lean and body congruence on the judgment of psychotherapeutic rapport , 1980 .

[53]  J. Romano,et al.  Social validation of a component model of assertive behavior. , 1980, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[54]  M. Patterson,et al.  Intimacy, arousal, and small group crowding. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  J. F. Andersen,et al.  The impact of lecturer nonverbal expressiveness on improving mediated instruction , 1981 .

[56]  Jon F. Nussbaum,et al.  Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning , 1981 .

[57]  M. Patterson,et al.  Effects of nonverbal intimacy on arousal and behavioral adjustment , 1981 .

[58]  D. Stacks,et al.  The role of nonverbal behaviors as distractors in resistance to persuasion in interpersonal contexts , 1981 .

[59]  R. Heslin,et al.  Perceptions of cross-sex and same-sex nonreciprocal touch: It is better to give than to receive , 1982 .

[60]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  The fundamental topoi of relational communication , 1984 .