Discovery and revision of Arabidopsis genes by proteogenomics

Gene annotation underpins genome science. Most often protein coding sequence is inferred from the genome based on transcript evidence and computational predictions. While generally correct, gene models suffer from errors in reading frame, exon border definition, and exon identification. To ascertain the error rate of Arabidopsis thaliana gene models, we isolated proteins from a sample of Arabidopsis tissues and determined the amino acid sequences of 144,079 distinct peptides by tandem mass spectrometry. The peptides corresponded to 1 or more of 3 different translations of the genome: a 6-frame translation, an exon splice-graph, and the currently annotated proteome. The majority of the peptides (126,055) resided in existing gene models (12,769 confirmed proteins), comprising 40% of annotated genes. Surprisingly, 18,024 novel peptides were found that do not correspond to annotated genes. Using the gene finding program AUGUSTUS and 5,426 novel peptides that occurred in clusters, we discovered 778 new protein-coding genes and refined the annotation of an additional 695 gene models. The remaining 13,449 novel peptides provide high quality annotation (>99% correct) for thousands of additional genes. Our observation that 18,024 of 144,079 peptides did not match current gene models suggests that 13% of the Arabidopsis proteome was incomplete due to approximately equal numbers of missing and incorrect gene models.

[1]  Steven B Cannon,et al.  The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2004, BMC Plant Biology.

[2]  B. Birren,et al.  Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements , 2003, Nature.

[3]  Nichole L. King,et al.  Integration with the human genome of peptide sequences obtained by high-throughput mass spectrometry , 2004, Genome Biology.

[4]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Pack-MULE transposable elements mediate gene evolution in plants , 2004, Nature.

[5]  R. Hangarter,et al.  A Plant-Specific Protein Essential for Blue-Light-Induced Chloroplast Movements1 , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[6]  S. Guha,et al.  Migration events play significant role in genetic differentiation: A microsatellite-based study on Sikkim settlers , 2005, Genome Biology.

[7]  Manesh B Shah,et al.  Expressed peptide tags: an additional layer of data for genome annotation. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[8]  Damian Fermin,et al.  Novel gene and gene model detection using a whole genome open reading frame analysis in proteomics , 2006, Genome Biology.

[9]  V. Brendel,et al.  Genomewide comparative analysis of alternative splicing in plants. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Burkhard Morgenstern,et al.  AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  A large number of novel coding small open reading frames in the intergenic regions of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome are transcribed and/or under purifying selection. , 2007, Genome research.

[12]  R. Guigó,et al.  Improving gene annotation using peptide mass spectrometry. , 2007, Genome research.

[13]  Patrick G. A. Pedrioli,et al.  A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  A. J. Schroeder,et al.  Revisiting the protein-coding gene catalog of Drosophila melanogaster using 12 fly genomes. , 2007, Genome research.

[15]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Whole proteome analysis of post-translational modifications: applications of mass-spectrometry for proteogenomic annotation. , 2007, Genome research.

[16]  P. Zimmermann,et al.  Katja Baerenfaller Models and Proteome Dynamics Gene Arabidopsis thaliana Genome-Scale Proteomics Reveals , 2012 .

[17]  M. Brent Steady progress and recent breakthroughs in the accuracy of automated genome annotation , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.